Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Land resellers

Domneth Dingson
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2006
Posts: 126
12-16-2006 04:02
From: Broccoli Curry
Best solution? Lock down all land to L$6/sq m and 95% of the playerbase win.

The 5% that lose are the land dealers - who frankly we could do without anyway. They control the land market, which controls the economy, which causes everyone pain.

What is Second Life without the ability to own land? Just a big chatroom with little point. The appeal of SL for many people is that they can buy some land, build something they want, and tailor their little bit of the game to just how they want it, not how someone else built.

Don't for one minute think that land dealers are here because they are providing a much needed service - they're doing it to make money, and that's all. They really don't care that they're manipulating the market price to suit their own needs - because there are enough people that will buy land regardless of how much it costs (example being the L$10,000 16 sqm ad parcel griefers).

A more flexible tier system, enabling people to expand without worrying about going up to the next high level would benefit so many players, I really don't understand why Linden Lab haven't implemented something like that already. It would encourage far more people to hold on to that little 512 that would put them over tier if they buy something else - and perhaps pay only $1 for it instead of $20 or whatever.

It pains me to see greed destroying Second Life just as it does reality.

Broccoli


Your 6$L a sqm I disagree with. I do find that alot of land is worth the high prices, such as waterfront property, something with an exceptional view, etc. Also, there's alot to do in-game that doesn't involve chatrooms or owning land, although, I fully admit to owning and developing on my own property as my personal favorite.
Ishtara Rothschild
Do not expose to sunlight
Join date: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 569
12-16-2006 04:25
Well, this topic shows once again that SL is not simply a game. The "playerbase" are residents of a virtual world, a world that contains game-like entertainment but that also is a business platform, often an extension of RL business.

Everyone who doesn't want to pay other residents can use only the services provided by LL. For example, one could buy a mainland sim directly from LL, at the lowest possible purchase price, and just split off and resell the unneeded land with just enough profit to cover the tier of L$195. As long as one has that opportunity, one can't complain about residents who try to make a profit.

From: Domneth Dingson
RL economics only go so far with any game, even SL. Land tier fees don't really counter the balance you get from a government tax system. The tax laws in the US make it impractical to buy land and resell for a minimum profit. SL has no such system, nor (do I feel) it would fit in. The differences still prevent the 'greed' business practices IRL.


SL doesn't need a tax system, since everyone who makes a profit here has to pay RL income tax. I should have mentioned that in my example; the land reseller will have to pay taxes for the earned US$139, to avoid defraudation of tax.
Domneth Dingson
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2006
Posts: 126
12-16-2006 04:32
From: Ishtara Rothschild
Well, this topic shows once again that SL is not simply a game. The "playerbase" are residents of a virtual world, a world that contains game-like entertainment but that also is a business platform, often an extension of RL business.

Everyone who doesn't want to pay other residents can use only the services provided by LL. For example, one could buy a mainland sim directly from LL, at the lowest possible purchase price, and just split off and resell the unneeded land with just enough profit to cover the tier of L$195. As long as one has that opportunity, one can't complain about residents who try to make a profit.



SL doesn't need a tax system, since everyone who makes a profit here has to pay RL income tax. I should have mentioned that in my example; the land reseller will have to pay taxes for the earned US$139, to avoid defraudation of tax.



I'm sorry, but having to pay income tax on money you make isn't the same as the penalties associated with buying and selling land IRL. 139 dollars isnt going to really effect your taxes(assuming you even bother to cash out with that amount). But when you take a 30 percent tax penalty on a 20k chunk of land, you'll think twice about what you are buying and if it's worth reselling.

**EDIT: once again, I do not endorse or support such a system in-game because I do not believe it would work in SL's architecture. See a previous post.**

Honestly, I put the people buying and selling entire sims into a different catagory from the everyday people here complaining about the cost of their 512, 1024, 2048 parcels.
Ishtara Rothschild
Do not expose to sunlight
Join date: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 569
12-16-2006 05:24
From: Domneth Dingson
I'm sorry, but having to pay income tax on money you make isn't the same as the penalties associated with buying and selling land IRL. 139 dollars isnt going to really effect your taxes(assuming you even bother to cash out with that amount). But when you take a 30 percent tax penalty on a 20k chunk of land, you'll think twice about what you are buying and if it's worth reselling.

**EDIT: once again, I do not endorse or support such a system in-game because I do not believe it would work in SL's architecture. See a previous post.**

Honestly, I put the people buying and selling entire sims into a different catagory from the everyday people here complaining about the cost of their 512, 1024, 2048 parcels.


Well, SL land isn't the same as RL land :) Unlike RL real estate, SL land isn't needed as housing space. You don't need a place to live inside SL in order to use the service. You don't need a kitchen or a place to sleep. Digital land is software, just data hosted on a server that you pay usage fees for. Insofar it's not any different from WoW gold coins (purchase price if you buy them on eBay, monthly fees paid to Blizzard in order to store your virtual possessions).

What I meant with buying an entire sim from LL: currently you can't lose any money by doing so. LL will charge your account, not your credit card (afaik, if mainland sims are billed the same way as islands). Means, when your sim is delivered, the USD balance in your account will show a negative value that you can pay off by selling the L$ earned by selling the uneeded parts of the sim. With the current land prices, you could even make quite a profit that covers your tier for several months. Buy a sim, keep only 2048 sqm (or whatever you need), sell the rest with profit and pay for the sim using the earned money.
Broccoli Curry
I am my alt's alt's alt.
Join date: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 1,660
12-16-2006 05:40
This is one of the big problems with Second Life. Lack of oversight.

It's not a free market, it's clear manipulation. When small groups of individuals control huge parts of one of the big reasons for being here, then that can only result in a lot of dissatisfied people who simply can't afford to buy land - so they end up not bothering to log in.

I'm seeing whole islands for sale for $2500 listed here ... why would anyone buy an island - especially an undeveloped one with no traffic - for that price when they can get a new one for $1675?

As much as Linden Lab want to stay out of running stuff - if they don't do something - and soon - there are going to be huge problems for everyone. Who'll be left? Those of us who play for fun and not profit, and actually care about providing something that others can enjoy.

Surely this is something that Zee Linden should be commenting on - and doing something about? He's been quiet lately.

My prediction? Give it a month or two, and something huge is going to happen to the economy, negatively, and SL is going to take a long time to recover from it.

Broccoli
Stephen Zenith
Registered User
Join date: 15 May 2006
Posts: 1,029
12-16-2006 06:37
From: Broccoli Curry

I'm seeing whole islands for sale for $2500 listed here ... why would anyone buy an island - especially an undeveloped one with no traffic - for that price when they can get a new one for $1675?


Because they'll be grandfathered at the old tier, saving the buyer $100US a month on tier fees over a new island? I don't buy, sell or rent land on private islands so I'm only speculating, but it seems pretty obvious to me why it costs more.

From: Broccoli Curry

Surely this is something that Zee Linden should be commenting on - and doing something about? He's been quiet lately.


You mean apart from posting the very interesting economic statistics that shows growth in premium accounts (the sole reason to be premium of course id the ability to own mainland land) outstripping growth in new land by a factor of 2, when historically it's been the other way around?

From: Domneth Dingson

If you buy a piece of land IRL and turn around to resell it the next day, you will take a huge penalty for doing so and you had better make one hell of a profit to cover the fees. If you keep that land for at least a year, the heaviest of those penalties are negated down to normal taxes. If you actually live in a house on that land for a year(2 years?), it's nearly a total write-off.


Of course, you're comparing the SL land market with the US RL land market, including taxation. Other countries have vastly different systems of taxation when it comes to real estate.

In the UK for example, your taxes are no different if you sell within an hour or a decade, the buyer pays a fixed percentage of the land value, called Stamp Duty (for historic reasons) on a sliding scale based on the sale value.

You would also pay Council Tax which funds local services (garbage collection, local policing, fire service etc) based on the appraised value of the property on an ongoing monthly basis, which strikes me as reasonably similar to tier.

I'll be honest though, it's nice to have a sensible debate about SL property without the name calling and finger pointing that has traditionally gone with it.
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
12-16-2006 09:12
From: Ishtara Rothschild
The market dictates the max. price; currently the resellers are lucky bastards, but that may change again soon. It's up to LL to change it, by selling more mainland :)
LL indicated that when they'll raise mainland prices, they'd be inclined to hit the higher tiers more than the low tiers which will hopefully cut into their margins enough to no longer make it worthwhile.

I did actually point out that your example was a legitimate reason to have resellers :). The problem is the active swooping to force everyone to pay the minimum price they set.

If I wanted to sell what I have at a price that is fair to me to people who are new to land owning and just looking for something to live, how would I go about it? The vultures would be there in 5 seconds, buy it and resell it at double. They'll stoop low enough to create dozens of new premiums just to snatch first land away from those who need it.
Broccoli Curry
I am my alt's alt's alt.
Join date: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 1,660
12-16-2006 09:16
From: Stephen Zenith
Because they'll be grandfathered at the old tier, saving the buyer $100US a month on tier fees over a new island? I don't buy, sell or rent land on private islands so I'm only speculating, but it seems pretty obvious to me why it costs more.


Nice thought, except the "money saved" is spent in 9 months - when, by then, there's a fairly good chance that the "grandfathering" will have been abolished, all land will be at the higher rate - and we'll probably have had another price increase by then as well. Not only that, new islands will be 'class 5', whereas old islands are most likely a class 4 or possibly even 3.

Broccoli
Domneth Dingson
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2006
Posts: 126
12-16-2006 09:49
From: someone
Posted by Stephen Zenith

Of course, you're comparing the SL land market with the US RL land market, including taxation. Other countries have vastly different systems of taxation when it comes to real estate.

In the UK for example, your taxes are no different if you sell within an hour or a decade, the buyer pays a fixed percentage of the land value, called Stamp Duty (for historic reasons) on a sliding scale based on the sale value.

You would also pay Council Tax which funds local services (garbage collection, local policing, fire service etc) based on the appraised value of the property on an ongoing monthly basis, which strikes me as reasonably similar to tier.

I'll be honest though, it's nice to have a sensible debate about SL property without the name calling and finger pointing that has traditionally gone with it.


My original intention when showing the difference in penalties between buying and selling land IRL and in the virtual world wasn't anything beyond that. It was simply to show that SL carries no such penalties of any kind, even when compared to your system. Currently if I buy a 512 lot for 3k and resell it for 8k, I get hit with a charge of 3 dollars extra. If I then buy another 512 lot after selling the first one, my monthly tier fee doesn't go up again, because I'm still at my highest point for that tier, that month.

From: someone
posted by Kitty Barnett
LL indicated that when they'll raise mainland prices, they'd be inclined to hit the higher tiers more than the low tiers which will hopefully cut into their margins enough to no longer make it worthwhile.

I did actually point out that your example was a legitimate reason to have resellers . The problem is the active swooping to force everyone to pay the minimum price they set.

If I wanted to sell what I have at a price that is fair to me to people who are new to land owning and just looking for something to live, how would I go about it? The vultures would be there in 5 seconds, buy it and resell it at double. They'll stoop low enough to create dozens of new premiums just to snatch first land away from those who need it.


Ugh, I'm not looking forward to LL's idea of hitting higher tiers. I'm hoping to expand my land to about 4096sqm. I don't think I'd really want to pay a higher monthly fee than it already is.

From: someone
by Ishtara Rothschild
What I meant with buying an entire sim from LL: currently you can't lose any money by doing so. LL will charge your account, not your credit card (afaik, if mainland sims are billed the same way as islands). Means, when your sim is delivered, the USD balance in your account will show a negative value that you can pay off by selling the L$ earned by selling the uneeded parts of the sim. With the current land prices, you could even make quite a profit that covers your tier for several months. Buy a sim, keep only 2048 sqm (or whatever you need), sell the rest with profit and pay for the sim using the earned money.
[/QUOTE}

Yes, but you missed my point. Most of the people here complaining, aren't the people who can afford to drop down 3k for their own sim. The people complaining here are looking for something between an extra 512 lot and 4096 (for the most part) and finding everything bought out that was reasonable and priced unreasonable. My example I had used before was a particular person who buys everything he can lower than him(the example was 1024 lots that were all priced at 20k yesterday, by the same individual), reprices it at much higher than what it's worth without doing anything to the land, not even bothering to change the description.

You are correct, however. It's the most efficient way to get your land if you can fork up that kind of cash. It really puts you above the problems others are experiencing.
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
12-16-2006 11:45
From: Domneth Dingson
Ugh, I'm not looking forward to LL's idea of hitting higher tiers. I'm hoping to expand my land to about 4096sqm. I don't think I'd really want to pay a higher monthly fee than it already is.
It seemed pretty much unavoidable at the time it came up (during the island price hike). It was said they were waiting until they had the necessary back-end in place before announcing mainland price changes.

Zee Linden stated they wouldn't price tier out of the reach of small land owners. A sim's worth of 4096m² already brings in $400 US/month so they can easily hike up a full sim's mainland tier to the $295 of private sims and leave the low end tiers pretty much alone.
History Rust
Autonomous Paperweight
Join date: 25 May 2006
Posts: 99
12-16-2006 11:59
From: Broccoli Curry
Nice thought, except the "money saved" is spent in 9 months - when, by then, there's a fairly good chance that the "grandfathering" will have been abolished, all land will be at the higher rate - and we'll probably have had another price increase by then as well. Not only that, new islands will be 'class 5', whereas old islands are most likely a class 4 or possibly even 3.

Broccoli

I think you worded that a bit strangely, the new owner would pay a higher up-front price in exchange for lower tier. This person will have saved enough in tier after nine months to offset their higher initial outlay.

Is everyone over at Stratics so negative? I'm seeing a trend here. lol
Ishtara Rothschild
Do not expose to sunlight
Join date: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 569
12-16-2006 12:27
From: Domneth Dingson
From: someone
by Ishtara Rothschild
What I meant with buying an entire sim from LL: currently you can't lose any money by doing so. LL will charge your account, not your credit card (afaik, if mainland sims are billed the same way as islands). Means, when your sim is delivered, the USD balance in your account will show a negative value that you can pay off by selling the L$ earned by selling the uneeded parts of the sim. With the current land prices, you could even make quite a profit that covers your tier for several months. Buy a sim, keep only 2048 sqm (or whatever you need), sell the rest with profit and pay for the sim using the earned money.


Yes, but you missed my point. Most of the people here complaining, aren't the people who can afford to drop down 3k for their own sim. The people complaining here are looking for something between an extra 512 lot and 4096 (for the most part) and finding everything bought out that was reasonable and priced unreasonable. My example I had used before was a particular person who buys everything he can lower than him(the example was 1024 lots that were all priced at 20k yesterday, by the same individual), reprices it at much higher than what it's worth without doing anything to the land, not even bothering to change the description.

You are correct, however. It's the most efficient way to get your land if you can fork up that kind of cash. It really puts you above the problems others are experiencing.


I'm sorry but... my point was: you don't need to drop down 3k. You don't need to pay a single cent of RL money. You order your sim; your USD account balance is charged and drops below zero. You didn't pay anything yet, you're in debt with LL. Then you sell parts of your sim, and use the earned money to pay off your debt. Your Lindex sales just pay off your negative account balance.
I too thought my credit card would be charged, and was glad to see I could pay it completely with the mainland sim sale without my bank account ever being touched.

I don't know though how long LL tolerates a negative account balance before charging your cc. But with the current need for cheaper land, your additional land could sell within a day after sim delivery.

What you do have to pay of course is a tier of $195 for one month. You could change your payment information to paypal and transfer that amount from your SL account to pp. Selling 90% of a sim should easily pay for the purchase price + tier.
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
12-16-2006 12:36
From: History Rust
I think you worded that a bit strangely, the new owner would pay a higher up-front price in exchange for lower tier. This person will have saved enough in tier after nine months to offset their higher initial outlay.
The example given was $2500 for an "old" sim vs $1675 for a "new" sim.

After 8 months the "old" sim will have cost: $2500 + 8 x $195 = $4060
After 8 months the "new" sim would have cost: $1675 + 8 x $295 = $4035

The grandfathering of "old" islands only extends to the end of 2007, so the net saving is "only" $475 and a lot can happen in those 9 months :).

From: someone
I don't know though how long LL tolerates a negative account balance before charging your cc. But with the current need for cheaper land, your additional land could sell within a day after sim delivery.
I'm not sure if they changed it since, but a few people have mentioned on Linden Answers that they were getting charged the fee the moment the order was placed, not even when the island was delivered.
Ishtara Rothschild
Do not expose to sunlight
Join date: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 569
12-16-2006 12:46
From: Kitty Barnett
I'm not sure if they changed it since, but a few people have mentioned on Linden Answers that they were getting charged the fee the moment the order was placed, not even when the island was delivered.


Yes, for the orders placed after the... forgot the date, the last orders taken for islands at the old price. If you purchase an island at the new price, it will be charged on delivery again, as it was before. I guess it's the same with mainland sims.
Nicolas Biddle
Registered User
Join date: 15 Dec 2006
Posts: 48
12-16-2006 13:27
From: Broccoli Curry
Nice thought, except the "money saved" is spent in 9 months - when, by then, there's a fairly good chance that the "grandfathering" will have been abolished, all land will be at the higher rate - and we'll probably have had another price increase by then as well. Not only that, new islands will be 'class 5', whereas old islands are most likely a class 4 or possibly even 3.

Broccoli

So, buy the market island if you bet that the grandfathering will last longer than 9 months, and there won't be another prices increase, and you think that the difference between class 5 and class 4 is worth the savings versus the alternative.
Or, buy the new island if you bet that the grandfathering will NOT last longer than 9 months, and/or there will be another prices increase, and/or you value the difference between class 5 and class 4 as not worth the differnce in price.
This seems to be what the market prices are telling you.
Don't make it out like the people are idiots for choosing option 1, as the first two factors you mentioned deal with an uncertain timeline.
Assume they are delibrative of all the factors you've mentioned.
Broccoli Curry
I am my alt's alt's alt.
Join date: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 1,660
12-16-2006 13:42
Given the lack of notice about the last change, and the carefully worded lack of promise of anything as far as maintaining the current - or new - pricing structures, I think it would have to be a very brave person to gamble on tier prices *not* going up in the next year.

Maybe it won't be the 50% increase we saw, again ... maybe it won't affect existing landowners... but I for one wouldn't want to take that gamble if I was ever in a position to justify the expense of an island.

Broccoli
1 2