There was no analogy made there. That was a direct quote from Lee Linden....
/111/2f/66175/1.html#post690056/111/2f/66175/1.html#post690056
In the message he makes this statement...
"Before purchasing any multi-CPU systems, we tested them thoroughly. (They're multi-CPU, Wayfinder, and that is a dramatically difference performance situation than multi-core. If you can please correct this in any future posts, it'd be helpful.) The machines are well over twice as fast as a class2 machine. The CPUs are about 25% faster, and the total memory bandwidth is very, very fast (yes, over twice)."
The 4CPU statement was theirs not mine. All I added was the class 5 line, as the class 5 servers were the same as class 4 with various upgrades.
/111/2f/66175/1.html#post690056/111/2f/66175/1.html#post690056
In the message he makes this statement...
"Before purchasing any multi-CPU systems, we tested them thoroughly. (They're multi-CPU, Wayfinder, and that is a dramatically difference performance situation than multi-core. If you can please correct this in any future posts, it'd be helpful.) The machines are well over twice as fast as a class2 machine. The CPUs are about 25% faster, and the total memory bandwidth is very, very fast (yes, over twice)."
The 4CPU statement was theirs not mine. All I added was the class 5 line, as the class 5 servers were the same as class 4 with various upgrades.
I'm sorry I pointed the analogy at you, when clearly LL's personel are giving off mixed messages and technical details regarding exactly what IS used on their systems. Other LL posts made claims to the systems I reported.
On the 'http://forums.secondlife.com/showpost.php?p=690056&postcount=13' there seems to be an apathy shown towards, what is clearly LL customers, when they report Lag issues. Do LL really expect us to all become overnight techies, and run about with meters etc offering them 'exact' details as to what appertains to be lag? At best, this is a shoddy cop out by them, and one they can easily hide behind. We are NOT network experts, nor do we have any useful information about their systems to be able to offer details regarding lag in what is clearly their domain and service.
The only thing the average user can offer, is their 'experiences' and relation to surfing the web, or playing other online games. Judging by the level of issues reported on these forums on a constant basis, they need to have some butt kicking sessions and perhaps employ a PR person(s) that understand where customers come from!
I believe customer loyalty has been pushed to the limits in recent months, with the clamity of customer support being withdrawn/withheld, billing issues, updates containing more bugs than the last offering, systems previously 'fixed' becoming broken again in the next offerings of updates.
I do know... a company I work with very closely in SL and RL, have won the contract to act as 3rd party testers for LL's software, and I trust them to get it right. It maybe too little too late for some, but with that knowledge, I'm going to hang in there a while longer.