|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
01-24-2010 00:52
From: Lula Svoboda I admit that I have put a couple of folks on ignore only because the photos they put in their signatures are so big. I rely on someone quoting them if they have said something I want to read. If no one quotes them, and I am really curious, then I will take them off ignore momentarily, read what they wrote, and then put them back on ignore.
It is not personal... just my choice. I think everyone should do as they please with their sigs. That's good thinking. If a person is inconsiderate enough to cause the intended width to be expanded, why take any notice of them. |
|
Weston Graves
Werebeagle
Join date: 24 Mar 2007
Posts: 2,059
|
01-24-2010 03:59
I enjoy seeing the occasional vanity picture that is larger than 512 wide, but those are usually confined to threads where it is expected. It's not a big issue, if you'll excuse the pun.
/me looks at his own signature properties and breathes a sigh of relief.
.
_____________________
Goodbye for now from human Weston, beagle Weston, and Keyboard Guy.  Best of both lives to you all. 
|
|
RockAndRoll Michigan
Registered User
Join date: 23 Mar 2009
Posts: 589
|
01-24-2010 05:31
I have never had sigs turned on in this forum. I read these threads to see what people have to say about the topic at hand. Sigs are not for that purpose. So I have no idea what size images people are using at all. It makes life a whole lot simpler that way.
|