Agree. I don't think it serves anyone for the greeters or mentors to feel like they're being inadequately supported. They support everyone, making a better environment for everyone, and I don't want them to feel bad about what they do.
> DIGRESSION
I understand that LL is a business, and as a business it has responsibilities to try to get the most output for the least input. And in a business sometimes you cannot be very agile responding to changing circumstances, because money is involved, and anything involving money takes too much time and too many people to do quickly.
I don't begrudge LL the way they're doing things. That this grand experiment is working at all is an amazing thing in itself. Sometimes they're going to make decisions that are not obviously in our best interest but in theirs...and that's as it should be. If LL can't pay the bills, meet payroll, turn profits and make the investors happy, then there is no SL for us. That's not carte-blanche to do things on a whim, but the fortunes of SL and LL are tied together. One does not exist without the other being a success.
< END DIGRESSION
We all know we'd be doing what we are doing, with official sanction or not. I don't think many of the volunteers are doing it for the ellz. They're doing it because they believe it's what must be done. It supports newbies and oldbies, and makes our Second Life a better life. It's a mission, a calling, and a responsibility.
I know that LL are thinking about all the aspects of the introductory experiences. That's why we've got the current experiments in place. It all takes time to plan, put in place, measure assess and plan again. You and I know that on the 'ground' in SL, things move a whole lot faster than that. SL evolves at a giddy pace compared to the real world, and that's hard to adapt to.
So, how do we monitor the quality of our greeter and mentor experiences? Do we follow each-other around? (seeing how someone else does something isn't a bad idea anyway) Do we create ad-hoc supervisors in some sort of hierarchy? Do we find some other way of measuring and improving what we do? Do we need LL to help us? If so, we probably need to give them some tentative solution or plan, rather than a problem on a plate
