Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

So when can we expect THIS for SL??

Haravikk Mistral
Registered User
Join date: 8 Oct 2005
Posts: 2,482
12-03-2007 01:45
From: Tod69 Talamasca
But if this is true, then why do you have:

"Computer: Dual 2.5ghz PowerMac G5, 4gb DDR RAM, 2 x 160gb Hard Drive (Striped), NVidia 6800 Ultra 256mb, 2mbps broadband modem"

SHouldn't an Apple IIC suffice? Why broadband? Shouldn't Dial-Up be good enough for you?

The point is, technology is about moving forward, not back nor staying still. That is the nature of the beast. It does get expensive, but you gotta pay if you wanna play. Just how it goes. I replace parts every year if possible, not 'bleeding edge' but as close as I can afford to.

It shouldn't have to move prohibitively forward. My machine used to run SL wonderfully, it was great. But it has been performing worse and worse with each update until recently when we got the firstlook viewer that I got close to being able to play SL like I used to. Thing is; the only graphical feature I have enabled that I did not have when I joined is flexible prims. Alone they cannot account for the huge loss of performance I suffered. In fact, when 1.10 came out (which introduced flexi-prims) I could get 20-50 fps, even with the current first-look I get maybe 20-30fps.

Dial-up was never any good for SL.
Obviously there has to be some minimum, but there is absolutely zero reason we need to increase that, not at the same rate that technology is progressing. A machine that runs SL playably now should still run SL playably in a few years. I mean, going back to the case with my machine, when I started playing SL my machine was only a year old and still a pretty heavy-weight piece of equipment for the time, as the graphics card was only just becoming about standard for mid to high end gaming rigs. Two years later and on the current main-viewer doing anything is a pain, and I'm a builder/scripter! Things take twice as long to do if not longer due to poor packet-loss performance and just general viewer performance issues.

Greater performance is a good thing for everyone, better graphics are only a good thing for people who don't fully understand what SL is about.
_____________________
Computer (Mac Pro):
2 x Quad Core 3.2ghz Xeon
10gb DDR2 800mhz FB-DIMMS
4 x 750gb, 32mb cache hard-drives (RAID-0/striped)
NVidia GeForce 8800GT (512mb)
Tod69 Talamasca
The Human Tripod ;)
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,107
12-08-2007 15:26
What LL needs to do is, update the System Requirements. At bare minimum- the 5xxx Nvidia series.

As of now, they list bare minimum specs as:

Windows System Requirements

  1. Internet Connection*: Cable or DSL
  2. Operating System: 2000, XP, or Vista
  3. Computer Processor: 800 MHz Pentium III or Athlon, or better
  4. Computer Memory: 512 MB or more
  5. Video/Graphics Card for XP/2000**:
    1. nVidia GeForce 2, GeForce 4 MX or better
    2. OR ATI Radeon 8500, 9250 or better
    3. OR 945 chipset

  6. Video/Graphics Card for Vista (requires latest drivers)**:
    1. nVidia GeForce 6600 or better
    2. OR ATI Radeon 9500 or better
    3. OR 945 chipset

GeForce 2??? :eek:
512 MB RAM??? :eek:

You can get more from a "Walmart Special" than that.

As scripters, builders, skin & texture makers, it would be in the best interest to be able to run Windlight. While you may not be able to see Windlight at its best, the customer might.
_____________________
really pissy & mean right now and NOT happy with Life.
1 2 3