Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Thank you, LL...

Hypatia Callisto
metadea
Join date: 8 Feb 2006
Posts: 793
05-26-2006 07:30
From: Fade Languish
Quite simply, if there was demand for the Linden dollar, people wouldn't be undercutting. They wouldn't have to, there would be buyers competing with each other on price to buy Lindens. The fact that people are 'undercutting' to sell their Lindens, demonstrates that supply exceeds demand, regardless of what your opinion on stipends is.


Yes, you see it as supply of money, and I see it as a lack of supply of users buying. We need more consumers. The current instability is not inducing users to stay, and unfortunately, I think the removal of the basic stipend is not an enticement to get users to stay, experiment with the program (which is really freaking cool) and go premium. It's more likely to make users unable to play with all the features of SL, get frustrated in their first 15 minutes inworld, and never log in again.

My personal preference is to do the hard fix, get more users to buy, get more users to go premium. The simple fix, reducing the money supply by taxing users harder and making it harder for them to play the game, will merely drive even MORE users away, causing the Linden demand to decline even further.

Remember also with all the world instability in the last weeks (denial of service attacks), hasn't helped with making users want to stay in game much. Merely reducing the money supply is not the answer - getting more users to spend in play IS the answer.

As for merchants upset about the exchange, their obvious route is to charge in USD and deliver content through different methods. Just wait till there's HTML on a prim, and everyone starts putting direct Paypal links inworld. :P
_____________________
... perhaps simplicity is complicated to grasp.
Surreal Farber
Cat Herder
Join date: 5 Feb 2004
Posts: 2,059
05-26-2006 07:31
From: Lewis Nerd
Adding removal of the ability to join a group from Basic accounts, as an incentive to go premium, would also disrupt a lot of the land renters who would suddenly find going premium isn't a bad deal after all.

There... we have a good solution where everyone wins except a couple of land barons. Perfect, no?

Lewis


Oh and folks like me who already pay $100+ USD a month through a partner cause I can't pay for my half of our island directly... and whose groups are all full of merchant orgs I have to join to be in a shop... yup.

You could suggest a nice money sink.. a weekly $L fee to stay in a group.. that might get interesting.
_____________________
Surreal

Phobos 3d Design - putting the hot in psychotic since 2004

Come see our whole line of clothing, animations and accessories in Chaos (37, 198, 43)
Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
05-26-2006 07:39
if the quality of your content is good people will gladly pay for it.

if a merchants content is crap, it's not LL's fault it doesn't sustain their second life.


From: Star Sleestak
for cutting my customer base.


For instead of branching out and offering novel content to induce customers to spend L$ (and to buy it from lindex) or to come up with innovative marketing techniques to compete with the older, more established merchants, you've taken away the impetus to get people spending.

Nope, they will watch every L$ like a hawk and not buy anything, no content and no L$ either.

I look for the L$ to drop to 1000/1 and the merchants to drop tier and go to SLexchange and SL Boutique so they can stay in business. They can just give out notecards with the URL on them on their parcel in world.

Just because a bunch of so called economists cannot grasp the concept of "nothing is worth more than someone is willing to pay for it"
_____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/
read my blog

Mecha
Jauani Wu
hero of justice
__________________________________________________
"Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate


Lewis Nerd
Nerd by name and nature!
Join date: 9 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,431
05-26-2006 07:43
From: Surreal Farber
You could suggest a nice money sink.. a weekly $L fee to stay in a group.. that might get interesting.


I have no particular problem with that as a suggestion.

Lewis
_____________________
Second Life Stratics - your new premier resource for all things Second Life. Free to join, sign up today!

Pocket Protector Projects - Rosieri 90,234,84 - building and landscaping services
Bloop Cork
This space for sale.
Join date: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 277
05-26-2006 07:45
If you are a content creator who wishes to sell your creations, you will benefit from an economic system that is healthy. You are in business whether you like that word or not and must learn how economies work--in the RW and in virtual worlds.

LL is intent on building RW economic value for residents in SL. Therefore, the SL virtual economy has RW ties. It does not operate in a vacuum. Read this post on a recent LL blog to see LL's intentions for SL: http://secondlife.blogs.com/change/2006/05/announcing_seco.html


From: Hypatia Callisto
Merely reducing the money supply is not the answer - getting more users to spend in play IS the answer.P

There is no single answer. Reducing the money supply is one of several measures that should be currently considered. You are of course correct in stating that their also needs to be an increase in consumers.
Rasah Tigereye
"Buckaneer American"
Join date: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 783
05-26-2006 07:50
From: Hypatia Callisto
Yes, you see it as supply of money, and I see it as a lack of supply of users buying.


It's two sides of the same coin. You either fix that by making users want to buy content by having more and better content, which means users have to go to Lindex to buy (and them not wanting to buy suggests Philip's GDP and econimics estimates are way off), OR you make it more difficult for the few buyers we actually have to aquire money (stippends), which would also in turn force more people to go buy on Lindex. First way is a difficult fix since you have to somehow force content creators to make stuff people would be willing to buy. Second is a double-edged sword since while increasing numbers of people having to go buy at Lindex, you'll be decreasing the nmber of people actually being here in total.However, the second option also decreases the total supply of money in general, which means that it'll be everyone who will be feeling a shortage of $L, making it's value go up.
ninjafoo Ng
Just me :)
Join date: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 713
05-26-2006 08:04
From: Rasah Tigereye
the second option also decreases the total supply of money in general, which means that it'll be everyone who will be feeling a shortage of $L, making it's value go up.


Its going to increase the size of the already booming free economy - 'make it share it' has never been more popular and making the poor poorer will only help, wont be long before you simply wont need to buy anything, ever.
_____________________
FooRoo : clothes,bdsm,cages,houses & scripts

QAvimator (Linux, MacOS X & Windows) : http://qavimator.org/
Rasah Tigereye
"Buckaneer American"
Join date: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 783
05-26-2006 11:45
From: Lewis Nerd
Adding removal of the ability to join a group from Basic accounts, as an incentive to go premium, would also disrupt a lot of the land renters who would suddenly find going premium isn't a bad deal after all.

There... we have a good solution where everyone wins except a couple of land barons. Perfect, no?

Lewis



Um, no, because more premiums = more $500l stippends = even higher supply of money = even worse inflation.
Musicteacher Rampal
Registered User
Join date: 20 Feb 2004
Posts: 824
05-26-2006 15:10
From: Jamie Bergman
Thats less than 20 cents per week USD. Good god man, unless they are living in some third world nation (with a hyperspeed internet connection and good computer) its peanuts.

Get over it.


Some people don't care what the USD value of their $L's are because they don't cash out, they don't put money in, they make do with what they are given because it is entertainment to them and not an investment. Some don't want to mess with getting the best buy deal, transaction fees, etc. when they want money, they just want automatic. It may take a few weeks to save enough to go shopping with, but that's less of a hassle to them than dealing with buying $L's. Why begrudge it to them?? And yes it is peanuts so why bother removing it at all??
Cocoanut Cookie
Registered User
Join date: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,741
05-26-2006 15:25
From: ninjafoo Ng
Damn right.

This has got to be the stupidest shortsighted ill-conceived quick fix there has ever been and can not be taken lying down.

Just wait till they get around to their next fixes!

coco
_____________________
Cocoanut Cookie
Registered User
Join date: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,741
05-26-2006 15:32
From: Parsalin Gullwing
I think your all looking at this in the wrong light, forgive me if im a silve rlining kinda guy, but why does 50 l matter? you think somone who logs in for 50 ls is making any difference in your sells?? caus trust me i had a basic account 50 ls is nothing even when i sat on linden givers or attepmted to win it, still didnt make much.

I think instead of focusing all your time on complaining why not spend that time thinking of new ways for noobies to earn money. Why not have avi who can "sell" your content. by "sell" i mean they get a finders fee for finding big "Sex clubs" as you mentioned and sell them a pacage deal.

I figure them noobies who come in and dont get 50 a week, they arent even gonna know and ya know what if free accounts dwindle thats all the non player accounts people used for sadly getting free lindens.

I belive the #1 biggest reason sl is doomed, is the new "Buyers" market system. if enough buyers post they wanna buy at 1000 eventually the rest will either get what they asked leaving these 1000 orders left or they will follow along. I think the # 1 stupidest thing happening right now is not stipend cuts cause in the long run 50 lindens for each new account, thats nothing nothing at all. the problem is sl is devalueing the linden buy making it all pull (buyers order) and no push (sellers order)

anyways i figured id just ramble on cause i went to sell 50k on the market and they wanted to sell them for about 360/1 dollar even though it said 328/1 dollar

To finish it off, stipeds suck look at the econ sinks and supplys its the biggest fre money situation. and hell if people want free money they can buy a premi account.

Well, the free money that comes with a premium account is going to go next.

Anyway, I disagree with your idea that $50 is nothing, and that you couldn't even get anywhere with winning things on top of that.

I was a basic member for three months, and by saving my stipend, entering contests, and running around to money trees and whatnot, I made enough to actually "own" my own land in Meins from Nexus Nash and Adam and pay tier to them each week.

Some people can scrimp and save their stipends, you know, and build up from there, and in that case, $50 is a whole lot more than $0. You can't save much with $0.

coco
_____________________
Cocoanut Cookie
Registered User
Join date: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,741
05-26-2006 15:35
From: Rasah Tigereye
Cause for a lot of people that "pretend" economy is being used to cover the at times over $100US fee that they are charged by LL in land tiers. If the "pretend" economy continues to crash, then instead of people complaining about loosing their stippends leaving, you'll see people who own land and islands leaving. Place might get quite a bit smaller and quite a bit more abandoned.

Well, I own land, AND I sell content, and if I lose my stipend, I will probably take one of the steps I outlined in the thread I started in this forum.

So I don't see them as two distinct groups, as you do.

coco
_____________________
Cocoanut Cookie
Registered User
Join date: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,741
05-26-2006 15:38
From: Jamie Bergman
Thats less than 20 cents per week USD. Good god man, unless they are living in some third world nation (with a hyperspeed internet connection and good computer) its peanuts.

Get over it.

Jamie, you fail to consider psychology in all of this. (And so do the Lindens, and every practically every other economic genius on these forums.)

It's a whole different thing to get your stipend, save it up, win contests, etc., and make your way that way, than it is just to sit down and buy Lindens. I did it the first way; I wouldn't DREAM of doing it the second way.

It's one reason I left There (and you see how successful There was, huh), and I know I'm not the only person who goes at these things this way.

coco
_____________________
Pricilla Delacroix
Registered User
Join date: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 2
05-26-2006 16:00
You know, as a newish user when I first logged in I had $250L. I did not know that I was going to be given an additional $50 per week in stipend, I don't really remember seeing that anywhere and is not why I created my basic account.

I created my account because I had heard about the place and wanted to check it out. I enjoyed it and decided to stay. I then found out I was awarded an additional $50L and can't say I ever really cared about it much, nor did I spend it. Within a week I had become a premium account in order to own some land and start to contribute to the environment. I learned quickly how to build and script and do my own thing so I don't really buy much and don't need much money.

I stumbled onto a good land deal for me first land, made about 40,000 off of it and pulled that money out and have not purchased or spent much money since. I usually wear freebie clothes or make my own, built my own house, etc.

I don't think that I care really one way or another about the stipend, I just don't understand the fuss and how it has spawn so much in the way of animosity between everyone. I thought this was a community myself, not a 'It has to be perfect for my needs' type of place. LL can't and shouldn't try to meet everyone's specific needs because at times they are going to be at odd with each other and that's not going to work. Instead they should have a focus for what THEY want SL to be and move towards it. Sure, listen to suggestions and if it matches what they are wanting then take them up, but to change anything because a VERY vocal minority demands it seems silly to me and anyone thinking that boycotts and contants threads about it is going to persuade them is fooling themselves.

Look, if you can make RL money here and that's what you want to do, then fine, enjoy yourself. But let's not demand that LL create an environment where you can do so easily if that is not what they are running and building this place for. Instead, use your brainpower and figure out how to capitalize from the environment as it is if that is your thing.

But what you are going to have to realize is that's not EVERYONE'S thing. I have no need of making a profit from SL. If I do, then fine. I am creating clothing and art, building houses that I may sell or give away depending and if I make enough LL to allow me to buy things in game, fine. If it works out that I can make some RL money from it too? Great. But if not I'm not going to lose any sleep over it or whine and cry because LL 'screwed me'.

And I think that you are going to find that MOST SL players are here for that reason. To make in game money to advance their in game characters and could give a whit about making RL money from the game. A lot of people pay $25 to $50 US a month on a game that gives them $0 in return because they enjoy the entertainment that that money gives them. And as more people find that they enjoy SL they will continue to come here, even without the $50 a month or they will go premium and collect a bit for their money (a fair-ish trade off for the monthly fee they pay) and it's really a small number of people whining and complaining on these boards causing themselves greif because 'the linden is devaluing against the US dollar'. It's NOT why MOST people are here.

*shrug* Ofcourse, I'm a newbie and will be flamed as not knowing what I'm talking about, but after reading thread upon thread of this nonsense I just wanted to get that off of my chest. As it were.
Osprey Therian
I want capslocklock
Join date: 6 Jul 2004
Posts: 5,049
05-26-2006 16:36
I appreciate your input, Pricilla.
Jopsy Pendragon
Perpetual Outsider
Join date: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 1,906
05-26-2006 16:47
Personally, I applaud LL for their ingenious approach...

Halved dwell income...
New players no longer get their L$50 stipends...
limit and market buy/sell changes...

There's so much being changed in rapid succession without letting things shake out that no one will be able to prove any one factor is responsible for making things worse... or that the changing of any one factor made things better (if, if beyond all expectation the value of the L$ does happen to recover).

And it certainly does add a bit of flare to the L&E forum, which is nice... it had been stuck in quite a rut.
Dmitri Polonsky
Registered User
Join date: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 562
05-26-2006 20:47
From: kerunix Flan
how do you knnow your customer are on basic account ?


The vast majority of purchasers in SL are basics as usually after a short time in SL most ppl can create content. With the basic stipend removed there went about 80% of sales. Personally I am thinking of pulling up stakes adn getting the he** out of SL and removing all my content. Maybe I can get some ppl to help me come up with a newer better platform which controls it own economy rather than letty a greedy fgew run it into the toilet like LL is doing.
kerunix Flan
Registered User
Join date: 3 Sep 2005
Posts: 393
05-26-2006 21:10
From: Dmitri Polonsky
The vast majority of purchasers in SL are basics as usually after a short time in SL most ppl can create content. With the basic stipend removed there went about 80% of sales. Personally I am thinking of pulling up stakes adn getting the he** out of SL and removing all my content. Maybe I can get some ppl to help me come up with a newer better platform which controls it own economy rather than letty a greedy fgew run it into the toilet like LL is doing.


You're over-reacting.
Remember that old basic account keep their stipend.

But... well... if you want to remove your content... just do it... bye !
Please send me your inventory with full perm before leaving :)
Gigs Taggart
The Invisible Hand
Join date: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 406
05-26-2006 22:22
From: Lewis Nerd
But assuming you have a product that you have created yourself, of reasonable quality, that sells... then that's fine.


Well Lewis, you shouldn't throw us all in your "quick buck" stereotype then.

While advertising the ability to make money may have attracted some of those, it attracted me too, in part.

And I do create quality products that do sell, well in fact. I have a full sim and I don't have to put very much of my own money in every month anymore. I'm almost to the break even point, cash flow wise.

Linden Lab needs more people that do create quality products, it's the only long term hope for success. Advertising the ability to make money is a way to show people that it's more than a game, it's a platform to build on.

It's not just me either. I'm seeing lots of new and original products coming in to the world every day.
Maximillion Grant
Registered User
Join date: 29 Jul 2005
Posts: 172
05-26-2006 22:24
From: ninjafoo Ng
But this change doesn't address that problem at all! it just slaps the new users in the face - harhar - should have joined yesterday!


I paid a $10 "lifetime membership" when I joined. Now it's free and that $10 will buy you 3200 Lindens at the moment or 62 weeks worth of stipends. It's hardly the end of the world for newbies.
Maximillion Grant
Registered User
Join date: 29 Jul 2005
Posts: 172
05-26-2006 22:30
From: Dmitri Polonsky
The vast majority of purchasers in SL are basics as usually after a short time in SL most ppl can create content. With the basic stipend removed there went about 80% of sales. Personally I am thinking of pulling up stakes adn getting the he** out of SL and removing all my content. Maybe I can get some ppl to help me come up with a newer better platform which controls it own economy rather than letty a greedy fgew run it into the toilet like LL is doing.


Your post doesn't really make much sense. If you're not one of the "greedy few" who is only in it for the money, then why does the stipend or the economy matter to you at all? Aren't you just creating for the fun of it then?
kerunix Flan
Registered User
Join date: 3 Sep 2005
Posts: 393
05-26-2006 22:30
From: someone
You know, as a newish user when I first logged in I had $250L. I did not know that I was going to be given an additional $50 per week in stipend, I don't really remember seeing that anywhere and is not why I created my basic account.

I created my account because I had heard about the place and wanted to check it out. I enjoyed it and decided to stay. I then found out I was awarded an additional $50L and can't say I ever really cared about it much, nor did I spend it. Within a week I had become a premium account in order to own some land and start to contribute to the environment.


Same here :D

And additionally :

From: Maximillion Grant
I paid a $10 "lifetime membership" when I joined. Now it's free and that $10 will buy you 3200 Lindens at the moment or 62 weeks worth of stipends. It's hardly the end of the world for newbies.


I paid $10 to be a basic too.
now i'm premium with more than 400000sqm (400k sqm) of land :)
Chris Richard
Registered User
Join date: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 1
05-26-2006 22:37
From: Jopsy Pendragon
Personally, I applaud LL for their ingenious approach...

Halved dwell income...
New players no longer get their L$50 stipends...
limit and market buy/sell changes...

There's so much being changed in rapid succession without letting things shake out that no one will be able to prove any one factor is responsible for making things worse... or that the changing of any one factor made things better (if, if beyond all expectation the value of the L$ does happen to recover).

And it certainly does add a bit of flare to the L&E forum, which is nice... it had been stuck in quite a rut.



Let's pretend the $L gaining in value on the market today is due to the recent changes :)
Star Sleestak
Registered User
Join date: 3 Feb 2006
Posts: 228
05-27-2006 01:25
From: Jauani Wu
if the quality of your content is good people will gladly pay for it.

if a merchants content is crap, it's not LL's fault it doesn't sustain their second life.



Let me explain something to you.

People can only use the content that is created for SL in SL. If people are not logging into SL, then they will not buy any content no matter how good it is.

A merchant can make a whiz bang product in SL and price it to move, but the people who do not log in will not buy that product. They will not buy it in game, they will not buy it in SLexchange, they will not buy it on Ebay, they will not buy it in SLBoutique. And the reason why has nothing to do with the quality of the product but because people are not going to buy anything for a game/platform/world that they do not log into.

And they are not going to buy the L$ either.
ninjafoo Ng
Just me :)
Join date: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 713
05-27-2006 01:50
From: Maximillion Grant
I paid a $10 "lifetime membership" when I joined. Now it's free and that $10 will buy you 3200 Lindens at the moment or 62 weeks worth of stipends. It's hardly the end of the world for newbies.

It is when actually buying currency for the first time is big hurdle, some people don't think twice about it, for others its a show stopper. Having a little money helps the nervous get used to the idea (and addicted) for a couple of weeks before taking the plunge.
_____________________
FooRoo : clothes,bdsm,cages,houses & scripts

QAvimator (Linux, MacOS X & Windows) : http://qavimator.org/
1 2 3