Second Life Forums Archive - things to vote for

StoneSelf Karuna

His Grace

Join date: 13 Jun 2004

Posts: 1,955

04-13-2005 17:55

http://secondlife.com/vote/
/3/77/42697/1.html

_____________________

AIDS IS NOT OVER. people are still getting aids. people are still living with aids. people are still dying from aids. please help me raise money for hiv/aids services and research. you can help by making a donation here: http://www.aidslifecycle.org/1409 .

Roberta Dalek

Probably trouble

Join date: 21 Oct 2004

Posts: 1,174

04-13-2005 19:41

Yep.

Please vote for paypal.

Thanks

Siggy Romulus

DILLIGAF

Join date: 22 Sep 2003

Posts: 5,711

04-13-2005 22:15

Oops! Too late! I just used up all my votes for a Linux client

_____________________

The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden

I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread

Latonia Lambert

Registered User

Join date: 24 Jul 2004

Posts: 425

04-14-2005 04:23

noooo - vote for free dragging and metres to destination from hub.. oh and ability to block multiple items in inventory to move or delete them.

Huns Valen

Don't PM me here.

Join date: 3 May 2003

Posts: 2,749

04-14-2005 04:40

voted havok2

_____________________

[ huns? || words || 1TBS KREW || VHI Aircraft || Whitepaper on Aircraft Physics ]

Make yourself and your objects immune to llPushObject().

Hiro Queso

503less

Join date: 23 Feb 2005

Posts: 2,753

04-14-2005 04:55

I voted for paypal, and being able to give more land permissions to individuals, not just groups.

I noticed the proposal for invisble mode. I think this is a good idea but with one proviso. I think if an avatar decides to be invisible, those he/she chooses to be invisible from should in return be invisble to them. This will prevent it being used for stalking and spying etc.

Hey, then we would have a multi dimensinal SL!!

Chris Wilde

Custom User Title

Join date: 21 Jul 2004

Posts: 768

04-14-2005 05:00

From: Hiro Queso

I noticed the proposal for invisble mode. I think this is a good idea but with one proviso. I think if an avatar decides to be invisible, those he/she chooses to be invisible from should in return be invisble to them. This will prevent it being used for stalking and spying etc.

Actually that 'invisible ignore' option did suggest the ignore/invisible work both ways.

Hiro Queso

503less

Join date: 23 Feb 2005

Posts: 2,753

04-14-2005 05:02

From: Chris Wilde

Actually that 'invisible ignore' option did suggest the ignore/invisible work both ways.

*slaps head* doh!! i should pay more attention

Ace Cassidy

Resident Bohemian

Join date: 5 Apr 2004

Posts: 1,228

04-14-2005 05:05

Proposal --

Allow all in-world disputes to be resolved in an arbitrary and capricious fashion by a group of residents known as the Fetid Inner Core. Membership in the Fetid Inner Core shall be determined by the Fetid Inner Core, and you can bet your bippy that YOU ain't in it.

- Ace

_____________________

"Free your mind, and your ass will follow" - George Clinton

Eggy Lippmann

Wiktator

Join date: 1 May 2003

Posts: 7,939

04-14-2005 05:07

Why the hell are people voting on havok2.
Havok2 will be here for 1.7. Andrew said "1.7 is all about Havok2"
It won't even be released before it has the new engine.
Bleh, I'm sure LL will just mark it as approved and you'll get your votes back.

_____________________

Help us document Second Life history at http://slhistory.org!

katykiwi Moonflower

Esquirette

Join date: 5 Dec 2003

Posts: 1,489

04-14-2005 05:10

Vote for multiple avatar texture layers so we can easily add and change tattoos while wearing a skin.

_____________________

Kris Ritter

paradoxical embolism

Join date: 31 Oct 2003

Posts: 6,627

04-14-2005 05:14

Vote for me! Um. I mean, my proposal.

A vote for Havok is a wasted vote! It's happening already! Use your Havok vote on Proposal 74 instead!

Eggy Lippmann

Wiktator

Join date: 1 May 2003

Posts: 7,939

04-14-2005 05:26

Kritter for president! I mean Troll Queen!

_____________________

Help us document Second Life history at http://slhistory.org!

Kris Ritter

paradoxical embolism

Join date: 31 Oct 2003

Posts: 6,627

04-14-2005 05:36

From: Eggy Lippmann

Kritter for president! I mean Troll Queen!

I already hold both offices, ty. Vote for Proposal 74!

(president of the Kris Ritter Association of Kris Ritters)

Ghoti Nyak

καλλιστι

Join date: 7 Aug 2004

Posts: 2,078

04-14-2005 05:52

Gotta love direct democracy. Rock the vote!

-Ghoti

_____________________

"Sometimes I believe that this less material life is our truer life, and that our vain presence on the terraqueous globe is itself the secondary or merely virtual phenomenon." ~ H.P. Lovecraft

Jack Digeridoo

machinimaniac

Join date: 29 Jul 2003

Posts: 1,170

04-14-2005 05:58

I think we should get to comment on each proposal. For instance, Havok 2 wont mean more ppl in a sim, or "better" physics but it will mean less crashing, so SL will be more fun.

Object-Object communication is neat, but remote object RPC is better. etc...

But still, a groundbreaking system this is, yes!

*edit, wow that fast. some of them have a "discuss" link already

_____________________

If you'll excuse me, it's, it's time to make the world safe for democracy.

Ace Cassidy

Resident Bohemian

Join date: 5 Apr 2004

Posts: 1,228

04-14-2005 06:10

From: Jack Digeridoo

I think we should get to comment on each proposal. For instance, Havok 2 wont mean more ppl in a sim, or "better" physics but it will mean less crashing, so SL will be more fun.

Here's the Unofficial Prop 4 Discussion Thread (Havoc 2) .

- Ace

_____________________

"Free your mind, and your ass will follow" - George Clinton

Kris Ritter

paradoxical embolism

Join date: 31 Oct 2003

Posts: 6,627

04-14-2005 06:13

From: Jack Digeridoo

I think we should get to comment on each proposal. For instance, Havok 2 wont mean more ppl in a sim, or "better" physics but it will mean less crashing, so SL will be more fun.

Object-Object communication is neat, but remote object RPC is better. etc...

But still, a groundbreaking system this is, yes!

*edit, wow that fast. some of them have a "discuss" link already

oh. lol. you edited that while I was replying to agree

Yeah, exactly. If a proposal is misleading in what it suggests it will do for you, its only fair that people can comment. As long as it doesnt turn into another battle ground.

Magnum Serpentine

Registered User

Join date: 20 Nov 2003

Posts: 1,811

04-14-2005 07:37

Vote for Prop 89

_____________________

things to vote for
StoneSelf Karuna His Grace Join date: 13 Jun 2004 Posts: 1,955	04-13-2005 17:55 http://secondlife.com/vote/ /3/77/42697/1.html _____________________ AIDS IS NOT OVER. people are still getting aids. people are still living with aids. people are still dying from aids. please help me raise money for hiv/aids services and research. you can help by making a donation here: http://www.aidslifecycle.org/1409 .
Roberta Dalek Probably trouble Join date: 21 Oct 2004 Posts: 1,174	04-13-2005 19:41 Yep. Please vote for paypal. Thanks
Siggy Romulus DILLIGAF Join date: 22 Sep 2003 Posts: 5,711	04-13-2005 22:15 Oops! Too late! I just used up all my votes for a Linux client _____________________ The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals. From: Jesse Linden I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
Latonia Lambert Registered User Join date: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 425	04-14-2005 04:23 noooo - vote for free dragging and metres to destination from hub.. oh and ability to block multiple items in inventory to move or delete them.
Huns Valen Don't PM me here. Join date: 3 May 2003 Posts: 2,749	04-14-2005 04:40 voted havok2 _____________________ [ huns? \|\| words \|\| 1TBS KREW \|\| VHI Aircraft \|\| Whitepaper on Aircraft Physics ] Make yourself and your objects immune to llPushObject().
Hiro Queso 503less Join date: 23 Feb 2005 Posts: 2,753	04-14-2005 04:55 I voted for paypal, and being able to give more land permissions to individuals, not just groups. I noticed the proposal for invisble mode. I think this is a good idea but with one proviso. I think if an avatar decides to be invisible, those he/she chooses to be invisible from should in return be invisble to them. This will prevent it being used for stalking and spying etc. Hey, then we would have a multi dimensinal SL!!
Chris Wilde Custom User Title Join date: 21 Jul 2004 Posts: 768	04-14-2005 05:00 From: Hiro Queso I noticed the proposal for invisble mode. I think this is a good idea but with one proviso. I think if an avatar decides to be invisible, those he/she chooses to be invisible from should in return be invisble to them. This will prevent it being used for stalking and spying etc. Actually that 'invisible ignore' option did suggest the ignore/invisible work both ways.
Hiro Queso 503less Join date: 23 Feb 2005 Posts: 2,753	04-14-2005 05:02 From: Chris Wilde Actually that 'invisible ignore' option did suggest the ignore/invisible work both ways. slaps head doh!! i should pay more attention
Ace Cassidy Resident Bohemian Join date: 5 Apr 2004 Posts: 1,228	04-14-2005 05:05 Proposal -- Allow all in-world disputes to be resolved in an arbitrary and capricious fashion by a group of residents known as the Fetid Inner Core. Membership in the Fetid Inner Core shall be determined by the Fetid Inner Core, and you can bet your bippy that YOU ain't in it. - Ace _____________________ "Free your mind, and your ass will follow" - George Clinton
Eggy Lippmann Wiktator Join date: 1 May 2003 Posts: 7,939	04-14-2005 05:07 Why the hell are people voting on havok2. Havok2 will be here for 1.7. Andrew said "1.7 is all about Havok2" It won't even be released before it has the new engine. Bleh, I'm sure LL will just mark it as approved and you'll get your votes back. _____________________ Help us document Second Life history at http://slhistory.org!
katykiwi Moonflower Esquirette Join date: 5 Dec 2003 Posts: 1,489	04-14-2005 05:10 Vote for multiple avatar texture layers so we can easily add and change tattoos while wearing a skin. _____________________
Kris Ritter paradoxical embolism Join date: 31 Oct 2003 Posts: 6,627	04-14-2005 05:14 Vote for me! Um. I mean, my proposal. A vote for Havok is a wasted vote! It's happening already! Use your Havok vote on Proposal 74 instead!
Eggy Lippmann Wiktator Join date: 1 May 2003 Posts: 7,939	04-14-2005 05:26 Kritter for president! I mean Troll Queen! _____________________ Help us document Second Life history at http://slhistory.org!
Kris Ritter paradoxical embolism Join date: 31 Oct 2003 Posts: 6,627	04-14-2005 05:36 From: Eggy Lippmann Kritter for president! I mean Troll Queen! I already hold both offices, ty. Vote for Proposal 74! (president of the Kris Ritter Association of Kris Ritters)
Ghoti Nyak καλλιστι Join date: 7 Aug 2004 Posts: 2,078	04-14-2005 05:52 Gotta love direct democracy. Rock the vote! -Ghoti _____________________ "Sometimes I believe that this less material life is our truer life, and that our vain presence on the terraqueous globe is itself the secondary or merely virtual phenomenon." ~ H.P. Lovecraft
Jack Digeridoo machinimaniac Join date: 29 Jul 2003 Posts: 1,170	04-14-2005 05:58 I think we should get to comment on each proposal. For instance, Havok 2 wont mean more ppl in a sim, or "better" physics but it will mean less crashing, so SL will be more fun. Object-Object communication is neat, but remote object RPC is better. etc... But still, a groundbreaking system this is, yes! *edit, wow that fast. some of them have a "discuss" link already _____________________ If you'll excuse me, it's, it's time to make the world safe for democracy.
Ace Cassidy Resident Bohemian Join date: 5 Apr 2004 Posts: 1,228	04-14-2005 06:10 From: Jack Digeridoo I think we should get to comment on each proposal. For instance, Havok 2 wont mean more ppl in a sim, or "better" physics but it will mean less crashing, so SL will be more fun. Here's the Unofficial Prop 4 Discussion Thread (Havoc 2) . - Ace _____________________ "Free your mind, and your ass will follow" - George Clinton
Kris Ritter paradoxical embolism Join date: 31 Oct 2003 Posts: 6,627	04-14-2005 06:13 From: Jack Digeridoo I think we should get to comment on each proposal. For instance, Havok 2 wont mean more ppl in a sim, or "better" physics but it will mean less crashing, so SL will be more fun. Object-Object communication is neat, but remote object RPC is better. etc... But still, a groundbreaking system this is, yes! *edit, wow that fast. some of them have a "discuss" link already oh. lol. you edited that while I was replying to agree Yeah, exactly. If a proposal is misleading in what it suggests it will do for you, its only fair that people can comment. As long as it doesnt turn into another battle ground.
Magnum Serpentine Registered User Join date: 20 Nov 2003 Posts: 1,811	04-14-2005 07:37 Vote for Prop 89 _____________________

Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

things to vote for