Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

I love my Hybrid vehicle more and more each day. :)

jrrdraco Oe
Insanity Fair
Join date: 28 Oct 2005
Posts: 372
04-24-2006 16:58
From: Psyra Extraordinaire
There's ones sprouting up all over here, I can't tell if they are hybrids or not, they look liike extra-mini-minivans. In fact, the way they look on the outside makes them look like cute lil' vehicles out of some anime. I think they were called Muganos or something? Anyone know what I'm talking about?

IU'm not specifically thinking of Muranos... but I'm sure it was LIKE them. Murano's are SUVs, and I know they're not those.



Oh look Psyra is not talking about birds or feathered cars ;D

Talking about the high price of the gas, I have never seen a gas station in SL, yes it is not exactly needed inworld, since many cars here works with garbage fuel like Delorean, but its an idea, some house that looks like what, an old styled 70´s gas station?
Vares Solvang
It's all Relative
Join date: 26 Jan 2005
Posts: 2,235
04-24-2006 17:04
Actually I have seen a couple of gas stations in sl while out wandering.

As for gas at $75 a barrel, as a person that trades crude oil futures, I am hoping for $80 a barrel!!

Ka-ching!!!

*prepares for the barrage of hatred soon to come her way*
Juro Kothari
Like a dog on a bone
Join date: 4 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,418
04-24-2006 17:08
From: ZATZAi Asturias
Yah, but concrete barriers aren't designed to smash cars, they're designto deflect them. show me a video of it being hit by a Ford Explorer at 60mph and then I "might" be convinced its safe.

Deflect them at low approach angles, but not at near head-on. If you're familiar with the technology behind the SMART car, then you would know how safe it is. It has been tested over and over by Mercedes-Benz (who owns SMART) as well as various government agencies. In crash tests, the SMART holds up better than a C-class MB and in the links to the videos below, you'll see it holds up just fine against a MB E-class in an offset frontal.

If I were a betting man and was to place a bet on a SMART vs. an Explorer hitting a barrier head-on at 70mph, my money would be on the SMART. At least SMARTs safety engineering isn't full of legislative loopholes designed by and for the benefit of the American auto industry.

SMART crash test video links:

SMART vs. MB E320
Link 1 - side view
Link 2 - overhead view
Link 3 - overhead angle view

SMART vs. another mini-class car
Link 1 - overhead view
Link 2 - side view



_____________________
Zuzu Fassbinder
Little Miss No Tomorrow
Join date: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 2,048
04-24-2006 19:14
The real advantage of the smart car isnt its gas usage, its the fact that you can find parking in european cities....

_____________________
From: Bud
I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.
Garoad Kuroda
Prophet of Muppetry
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 2,989
04-24-2006 19:28
From: Neehai Zapata
I love my Prius.

How much is gas now? I can't remember. It's been three weeks since I filled up.


Well, as long as you aren't a celebrity who owns a private jet or yacht, and preaches about it saving the planet, that's cool.

I'm probably on about three months now since I've gotten gas. :D

Public transportation and tiny 4 cylinder cars can go a long way too...
_____________________
BTW

WTF is C3PO supposed to be USEFUL for anyway, besides whining? Stupid piece of scrap metal would be more useful recycled as a toaster. But even that would suck, because who would want to listen to a whining wussy toaster? Is he gold plated? If that's the case he should just be melted down into gold ingots. Help the economy some, and stop being so damn useless you stupid bucket of bolts! R2 is 1,000 times more useful than your tin man ass, and he's shaped like a salt and pepper shaker FFS!
Psyra Extraordinaire
Corra Nacunda Chieftain
Join date: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 1,533
04-24-2006 19:32
From: jrrdraco Oe
Talking about the high price of the gas, I have never seen a gas station in SL, yes it is not exactly needed inworld, since many cars here works with garbage fuel like Delorean....


They work like that in the movies too!

_____________________
E-Mail Psyra at psyralbakor_at_yahoo_dot_com, Visit my Webpage at www.psyra.ca :)

Visit me in-world at the Avaria sims, in Grendel's Children! ^^
Kathmandu Gilman
Fearful Symmetry Baby!
Join date: 21 May 2004
Posts: 1,418
04-24-2006 21:05
From: Neehai Zapata
My battery is under warranty.


Umm I believe the battery warranty for the Toyota is five years, it is designed to fail at 8-10 years with the intention you junk the car at that point because the battery will cost more than the car is worth. Then you may very well have to pay to have the battery disposed of and that could be another $1000. I am too poor to drive a car like that.
_____________________
It may be true that the squeaky wheel gets the grease but it is also true that the squeaky wheel gets replaced at the first critical maintenance opportunity.
Juro Kothari
Like a dog on a bone
Join date: 4 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,418
04-24-2006 23:47
I filled up my car today... $3.40/gallon for Premium. Weee. Still cheap though.
_____________________
Dani Frua
Bilingual Mac/Win
Join date: 9 Nov 2005
Posts: 65
forget hybrid....
04-25-2006 01:11
I have a Prius, but these are then next big thing in London:
http://www.goingreen.co.uk/index.html?PageID=AboutGWiz
It costs £8 ($14) to drive into central London on a weekday, unless you have an "alternative fuel" car like a hybrid or an electric car. As a result, these all-electrics are suddenly very popular!
They are four seaters made in India, anyone over about 5ft 8in looks like Mr Incredible... No gears, but two settings: economy and "perfomance". Actually, they are a lot of fun to drive (I tried one) and they attract more attention than driving a Ferrari (tho I haven't tried one of those)
ZATZAi Asturias
Artificial Isle
Join date: 7 Oct 2005
Posts: 189
04-25-2006 01:23
From: Juro Kothari

Deflect them at low approach angles, but not at near head-on. If you're familiar with the technology behind the SMART car, then you would know how safe it is. It has been tested over and over by Mercedes-Benz (who owns SMART) as well as various government agencies. In crash tests, the SMART holds up better than a C-class MB and in the links to the videos below, you'll see it holds up just fine against a MB E-class in an offset frontal.

If I were a betting man and was to place a bet on a SMART vs. an Explorer hitting a barrier head-on at 70mph, my money would be on the SMART. At least SMARTs safety engineering isn't full of legislative loopholes designed by and for the benefit of the American auto industry.

SMART crash test video links:

SMART vs. MB E320
Link 1 - side view
Link 2 - overhead view
Link 3 - overhead angle view

SMART vs. another mini-class car
Link 1 - overhead view
Link 2 - side view





My concern is not the legalities or politics behind a car. It could be a BMW SUV that hits the smart car for all I care. My concern is soley on the safety of the passengers in the vehicle, and I doubt a car like that, even if it had a perfect defenseive frame, could truly protect its passengers from being hit by a car that weighed 10x what it does. I fear it would get tossed like a rag doll, and that would not be good for those inside.

I stand by what I originally said, show me a video of it being hit for a Ford Explorer, or some other equaly heavy SUV, travelling at 60mph, and maybe then I will consider it safe. Part of the reason I would need to see it being hit by a SUV is the difference in height of the bumpers, too often had I heard of the bumpers of some SUB going through the upper portions of a compact car, never being slowed by the ultra safe grid of protection, just inches below...
_____________________
- ZATZAi
Juro Kothari
Like a dog on a bone
Join date: 4 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,418
04-25-2006 08:23
From: ZATZAi Asturias
My concern is not the legalities or politics behind a car. It could be a BMW SUV that hits the smart car for all I care. My concern is soley on the safety of the passengers in the vehicle, and I doubt a car like that, even if it had a perfect defenseive frame, could truly protect its passengers from being hit by a car that weighed 10x what it does. I fear it would get tossed like a rag doll, and that would not be good for those inside.

I stand by what I originally said, show me a video of it being hit for a Ford Explorer, or some other equaly heavy SUV, travelling at 60mph, and maybe then I will consider it safe. Part of the reason I would need to see it being hit by a SUV is the difference in height of the bumpers, too often had I heard of the bumpers of some SUB going through the upper portions of a compact car, never being slowed by the ultra safe grid of protection, just inches below...

I don't have a video of that specific scenario, so it looks like all of the other videos and data aren't going to convince you that the SMART *is* one of the safest cars out there - small or not. The strength of the Tridion safety cell is enourmous and would probably hold up just fine in a standard side-impact test with an SUV, even with the difference in bumper height. The opening in the safety cell is too small for the bumper of an SUV to go through and since the cell extends from the floor to the roof, it cannot go 'over'.



I will tell you that any car being broad-sided by any SUV at 60mph is in for some serious damage. Most side impact crash tests are performed in the 30-35mph range, not 60.

Since I am unable to find a video of the specific type you request, which for some reason is the only way you'll consider a car 'safe' (nevermind all the other data available), I think it's safe to say this car isn't for you.

p.s. - politics *should* matter - it is because of these that we have this issue of SUV vs. other.
_____________________
Neehai Zapata
Unofficial Parent
Join date: 8 Apr 2004
Posts: 1,970
04-25-2006 13:50
From: Kathmandu Gilman
Umm I believe the battery warranty for the Toyota is five years, it is designed to fail at 8-10 years with the intention you junk the car at that point because the battery will cost more than the car is worth. Then you may very well have to pay to have the battery disposed of and that could be another $1000. I am too poor to drive a car like that.

You believe wrong.
_____________________
Unofficial moderator and proud dysfunctional parent to over 1000 bastard children.
Briana Dawson
Attach to Mouth
Join date: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,855
04-25-2006 14:11
From: Kathmandu Gilman
Umm I believe the battery warranty for the Toyota is five years, it is designed to fail at 8-10 years with the intention you junk the car at that point because the battery will cost more than the car is worth. Then you may very well have to pay to have the battery disposed of and that could be another $1000. I am too poor to drive a car like that.


Road & Track says the warranty is 8 years with a 10 year lifespan guestimate.

Here is an article from 2004 about the battery: http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=19&article_id=1183&page_number=1

In this article the price of gas is $1.65/gal.

Briana Dawson
Huns Valen
Don't PM me here.
Join date: 3 May 2003
Posts: 2,749
04-25-2006 16:44
15 gallons of gas will last me about 300 miles. I floor it on every onramp, sometimes with the air conditioner on. My next car will probably be a G35, which will require more expensive gas and possibly get poorer mileage. If they've got a hybrid G35 available by that time, I'll buy it, chiefly for the extra low-end torque coming from the electric motor.

Now, if I was commuting 50 miles a day, and there was no hybrid G35, my next car would be a hybrid Accord. A big comfy V6-powered car with some extra torque, and it gets great mileage? Well, why not.
ZATZAi Asturias
Artificial Isle
Join date: 7 Oct 2005
Posts: 189
04-25-2006 18:40
From: Juro Kothari

I don't have a video of that specific scenario, so it looks like all of the other videos and data aren't going to convince you that the SMART *is* one of the safest cars out there - small or not. The strength of the Tridion safety cell is enourmous and would probably hold up just fine in a standard side-impact test with an SUV, even with the difference in bumper height. The opening in the safety cell is too small for the bumper of an SUV to go through and since the cell extends from the floor to the roof, it cannot go 'over'.



I will tell you that any car being broad-sided by any SUV at 60mph is in for some serious damage. Most side impact crash tests are performed in the 30-35mph range, not 60.

Since I am unable to find a video of the specific type you request, which for some reason is the only way you'll consider a car 'safe' (nevermind all the other data available), I think it's safe to say this car isn't for you.

p.s. - politics *should* matter - it is because of these that we have this issue of SUV vs. other.


Well if you can find a video of a crash of that sort at 30mph I will take a look at it. But yes, ultimately my main concern is the safety of myself and my loved ones, politics be damned. Not that politics aren't important, but those are my priorities.

And yes, any car broadsided by an SUV at 60 is in for a world of hurt, thats not to say that steps cant be taken to protect oneself from such a scenario. Driving an SUV oneself helps. And no, I don't drive an SUV... Minivan for me (I am considering a smallish Hybrid truck thingy though, like a Rav-4 equivalent).
_____________________
- ZATZAi
Juro Kothari
Like a dog on a bone
Join date: 4 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,418
04-25-2006 23:37
From: ZATZAi Asturias
Well if you can find a video of a crash of that sort at 30mph I will take a look at it. But yes, ultimately my main concern is the safety of myself and my loved ones, politics be damned. Not that politics aren't important, but those are my priorities.

And yes, any car broadsided by an SUV at 60 is in for a world of hurt, thats not to say that steps cant be taken to protect oneself from such a scenario. Driving an SUV oneself helps. And no, I don't drive an SUV... Minivan for me (I am considering a smallish Hybrid truck thingy though, like a Rav-4 equivalent).

Actually, you should really do some additional research before buying into the whole 'SUVs are safer' line. I think you'll be very surprised at the outcome. I think if safety is your #1 priority, you'd be much better off buying a Volvo S80 or S60.

I know politics aren't part of your criteria for buying, but when you look at an SUV and think 'safe' simply because it sits up higher - you've done nothing buy take a bite from the well funded marketing efforts by Detriot's finest. This is not to say there aren't some SUV's out there that *are* safe - the Volvo XC90, the VW Touareg, BMW X5 & X3 are all very safe in a passive sense, but lack most of the active safety features that most cars have.

Because of the additional weight that is carried up higher than in a car, they are subject to rollovers at a much higher rate than cars are. They perform poorly in braking tests compared to cars and they are still not required to meet the same Federal crash standards that cars are. That means if your SUV decides to play dead and rollover on its roof - you run a higher risk of that roof collapsing than in a car.

If you really want an SUV for your family, buy the Volvo - you can sit up high feeling secure and actually have safety features to back up that sense of security.
_____________________
ZATZAi Asturias
Artificial Isle
Join date: 7 Oct 2005
Posts: 189
04-26-2006 20:29
I don't think SUVs are safer simply because one sits up higher. One would of course do research on a series of cars before buying it, SUVs and all tall cars do indeed have a higher roll-over rate than sedans or sports cars, 2+2 is also equal to 4.

;-p

Make the leap that I have a level of intelligence greater than that of a 5 year old. If you want to sell the idea of this Smart Car to me, say something smart to convince me of its safety. I'm asking you to prove to me the safety of the car in a specific situation, and you're dancing around the issue like any good car salesman would.

Color me unimpressed.
_____________________
- ZATZAi
Juro Kothari
Like a dog on a bone
Join date: 4 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,418
04-27-2006 11:47
From: ZATZAi Asturias
I don't think SUVs are safer simply

;-p

Make the leap that I have a level of intelligence greater than that of a 5 year old. If you want to sell the idea of this Smart Car to me, say something smart to convince me of its safety. I'm asking you to prove to me the safety of the car in a specific situation, and you're dancing around the issue like any good car salesman would.

Color me unimpressed.

I don't need to 'sell' you on anything - you're comments on all the videos speak volumes. I'm also not 'dancing' around any issue - I provided plenty of links, you're unimpressed and I think you've already made up your mind on the safety of this particular auto.

My apologies if you felt I was speaking to you in a tone more fitting for a toddler, but I speak to people daily who absolutely believe that an SUV is a safer than a regular sedan, simply because that's what they've been told. They don't go out and do any reasearch. They spend more time deciding what color to get or arguing about how many cupholders they need instead of what safety feature, both active and passive, a vehicle has.

If you're seriously interested in that vehicle do some research on it and you'll find it is indeed a very safe vehicle.
because one sits up higher. One would of course do research on a series of cars before buying it, SUVs and all tall cars do indeed have a higher roll-over rate than sedans or sports cars, 2+2 is also equal to 4.
_____________________
ZATZAi Asturias
Artificial Isle
Join date: 7 Oct 2005
Posts: 189
04-27-2006 17:26
From: Juro Kothari

I don't need to 'sell' you on anything - you're comments on all the videos speak volumes. I'm also not 'dancing' around any issue - I provided plenty of links, you're unimpressed and I think you've already made up your mind on the safety of this particular auto.

My apologies if you felt I was speaking to you in a tone more fitting for a toddler, but I speak to people daily who absolutely believe that an SUV is a safer than a regular sedan, simply because that's what they've been told. They don't go out and do any reasearch. They spend more time deciding what color to get or arguing about how many cupholders they need instead of what safety feature, both active and passive, a vehicle has.

If you're seriously interested in that vehicle do some research on it and you'll find it is indeed a very safe vehicle.
because one sits up higher. One would of course do research on a series of cars before buying it, SUVs and all tall cars do indeed have a higher roll-over rate than sedans or sports cars, 2+2 is also equal to 4.


Aha, you are a car salesman, I knew it. This... explains much.
_____________________
- ZATZAi
Kathmandu Gilman
Fearful Symmetry Baby!
Join date: 21 May 2004
Posts: 1,418
04-27-2006 19:58
From: Briana Dawson
Road & Track says the warranty is 8 years with a 10 year lifespan guestimate.

Here is an article from 2004 about the battery: http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=19&article_id=1183&page_number=1

In this article the price of gas is $1.65/gal.

Briana Dawson


Yes, well the rose colored glasses have changed shades after a couple years of real world usage. First off, the batteries used are not reconditionable. They are like laptop batteries (in fact, they basically are laptop batteries) and their ability to hold a charge will decrease over time based on recharge cycles. Sure, it will still be going in 10 years but you may only be getting a range of 5 miles. The toxisity of the NimH batteries is such that it has to be disposed of as hazardus waste.

The warranty for the Toyota is 5 years in Austrailia, and varies from state to state in the US, in California it is 10 years and 8 in most other states although it can vary with the dealer as well and some people are getting only five years on pre 2004 cars, sorry for the confusion.

Also, you stated you are getting far less than the 60 mpg the Prius is supposed to get, other owners are wondering about the math Toyota is using.

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2005/hybridwatch01.html

I like the surprise "need to charge the battery every two weeks or your warranty is void" yet not telling the buyer.. oooh. The "feel good" milage computer is even better...
_____________________
It may be true that the squeaky wheel gets the grease but it is also true that the squeaky wheel gets replaced at the first critical maintenance opportunity.
Neehai Zapata
Unofficial Parent
Join date: 8 Apr 2004
Posts: 1,970
04-28-2006 14:02
From: Kathmandu Gilman
Also, you stated you are getting far less than the 60 mpg the Prius is supposed to get, other owners are wondering about the math Toyota is using.

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2005/hybridwatch01.html

I like the surprise "need to charge the battery every two weeks or your warranty is void" yet not telling the buyer.. oooh. The "feel good" milage computer is even better...

You seem strangely hostile towards the Prius.

First off, let me say that I am sorry that you are poor. I do hope your poverty isn't driving your opinion.

Second, all vehicles get less mileage than touted on the sticker. Mileage is based on a closed road test under optimal conditions. I am happy with the mileage my car gets and the mileage I have divulged earlier in this thread.

As for the "feel good" mileage computer. It is an estimate but pretty darm close for my car. I drive it down to until it beeps that it wants more gas and then calculate the actual mileage after I fill up. If I ever doubt that my car gets better mileage than my previous, I can just look at my bank statements and count the trip to the gas pump.

That entire article was based on some person named "Sarah" who claimed she wasn't getting near the mileage she should be. I'm not sure who Sarah is or how she is driving but I am not sure I could even make my Prius get 35mpg if I tried.

"Hybrid cars performed much closer to EPA estimates in Consumer Reports'
highway tests."

You can selectively pull out the information you want to make your attack against hybrid cars, but so far I find your facts to be lacking.
_____________________
Unofficial moderator and proud dysfunctional parent to over 1000 bastard children.
Connor Nico
Registered User
Join date: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 15
04-28-2006 14:42
Actually EPA estimates for fuel economy come from the SAE derived fuel economy during the emmisions test. All cars get less than these numbers since the method was devised in the 70's before closed loop systems were in use. The Prius being an extremely low emmissions vehicle will likely vary more from the sticker than a typical SUV.

How someone drives of course effects economy considerably. Simply driving a little slower and accelerating less will impact economy quite a bit , and bring you much nearer the EPA sticker numbers.

As far as that SMART car it looks interesting - it has 60 horse power and weighs 1500 pounds. Therefore it is actually comprable to a car such as the early Tercel or Chevette in power and weight. I dont know if its worth 25k though.

I think the real concern I would have for long term ownership of a car like the prius though isnt the battery cost , it would be that transmission. It is so complex that replacing it out of waranty would have to be extremely expensive.

Ford was for a time working on a Hybrid that used direct drive electric motors. This is inferior in overall performance than the Prius system, with a distinct advantage that direct electric drive motors last over 300,000 miles in tests. Becuase of things like this, I suspect the hybrids 10 years from now will be much more impressive even than the Prius.

Here is an example of a more traditional Compact Car that gets 60 miles per gallon Using an advanced diesel engine rather than a hybrid.


http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/02/vw_introduces_6.html


Diesel hybrids have been proposed of course but the US laws are designed around gasoline engines for light duty vehicles and making a diesel work well in that framework is difficult. If the laws were made more like Europes, 80 miles per gallon compacts should be possible.
Karsten Rutledge
Linux User
Join date: 8 Feb 2005
Posts: 841
04-28-2006 21:04
The fuel economy on these cars is tempting, but I agree with the point someone else made earlier. I have a van that makes a mockery of fuel efficiency (not a mini van, gets about 11-12 mpg in town, 17-18 on the highway), but I don't drive it very much, and I live in a town of 50K. There's no where I can't go in like 5 minutes. It's also paid off, I love driving it (nothing rides and drives quite like a van, yes I'm weird), and I can pull trailers with it (it moved me across the country recently), take the family of four and some friends out for the night, go to the hardware store and pick up more than one bag of potting soil at a time for the garden, load up the family with everything we need for a couple weeks of camping, etc, etc, etc. I'll pay the higher gas prices that are still less than a car payment on a fancy new hybrid car that won't be any use to me.
_____________________


New products, updates, rants, randomness.
Addictive high-quality games for sale: Greedy Greedy, On-A-Roll, Mancala and the newly released Khet laser strategy game.
Juro Kothari
Like a dog on a bone
Join date: 4 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,418
05-02-2006 16:04
From: ZATZAi Asturias
Aha, you are a car salesman, I knew it. This... explains much.

I'm not a salesman of any type. I just like to get out there and do some research and learn about my vehicle purchase vs. buying what looks pretty/cool.
_____________________
Jake Reitveld
Emperor of Second Life
Join date: 9 Mar 2005
Posts: 2,690
05-02-2006 16:08
Lets see, my miata has an intercooled greddy turbo, a team voodo fule management system, an after market ECU, Eibach racing suspension, an ACT stage II clutch and running about 8lbs of boost I still get about 23 MPG. yeah I'm gonna trade that in for a hybrid..in hell.
_____________________
ALCHEMY -clothes for men.

Lebeda 208,209
1 2 3