Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Since Freeom of Speech +/ Expression is in Question Now..

Champie Jack
Registered User
Join date: 6 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,156
04-18-2006 16:21
well, I'm done here.

Eismans retarded thread is derailed and a few more SL'ers have proven to be "mentally challenged" as well.

I extend "huggerz" to Trinity :) because she asked nicely.
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
04-18-2006 16:26
From: Champie Jack
Bush=Hitler
Bush is a fucktard
Fuck that Fucking asshole Bush
Bush is a Fascist



Does this cry out for being a sig quote ot what?? :D
_____________________
Michael Seraph
Second Life Resident
Join date: 9 Nov 2004
Posts: 849
04-18-2006 16:26
From: Champie Jack
Again, common sense escapes you as it does others.

"sowwy" is baby spelling.

"staement" is a typographic error.

any more salient points I can make for you?


Those were salient?

"sowwy" is intentional, "staement" is an error. An error that is easily avoided. Calling somebody retarded for intentionally writing a word a certain way and then making a stupid mistake yourself seemed ironic. But all that aside, the point I was making was that there didn't seem to be an argument going on. Just you bitching about something or other.
Champie Jack
Registered User
Join date: 6 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,156
04-18-2006 16:49
From: Michael Seraph
Those were salient?

"sowwy" is intentional, "staement" is an error. An error that is easily avoided. Calling somebody retarded for intentionally writing a word a certain way and then making a stupid mistake yourself seemed ironic. But all that aside, the point I was making was that there didn't seem to be an argument going on. Just you bitching about something or other.


yeah, good point. I was bitching about someone bitching.

But my bitching was a response to someone bitching as a thread starter..big difference.

Sure, I'll also accept the irony. But the "argument" was not about errors. errors like typos can be forgiven, but intentional idiocy is kind of pathetic when the original post made a serious effort to confront an issue.
Lucca Kitty
Connie Dobbs' Incarnation
Join date: 13 Dec 2004
Posts: 60
04-19-2006 08:57
I believe a good quote is in order.

To quote the 18th century French philosopher, Voltaire: I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will fight to the death your right to say it!
Lucca Kitty
Connie Dobbs' Incarnation
Join date: 13 Dec 2004
Posts: 60
04-19-2006 08:59
From: Champie Jack
yeah, good point. I was bitching about someone bitching.

But my bitching was a response to someone bitching as a thread starter..big difference.


But your bitching in response to someone bitching caused someone else to bitch at your bitching about someone's bitching and now you're bitching about someone bitching about you bitching about someone's bitching. Do you see where this is going?
Champie Jack
Registered User
Join date: 6 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,156
04-19-2006 19:53
From: Lucca Kitty
But your bitching in response to someone bitching caused someone else to bitch at your bitching about someone's bitching and now you're bitching about someone bitching about you bitching about someone's bitching. Do you see where this is going?


shamefully, I do :(
Trinity Serpentine
Schwan's Avitar Reject
Join date: 1 Oct 2003
Posts: 2,972
04-20-2006 07:29
Awwww, Champie, step aaawwwaaaay from this thread. *huggerz*
_____________________
From: someone
Yeah, the toaster has great speakers, but all I want is fucking toast.
- The Filthy Critic reviewing Aeon Flux
1 2