Staying in Iraq

This is the last time I will reply to you conversations with you are in general worthless.

Bush is a terrorist *is* a radical view point.
People who support Bush are traitors *is* a radical view point.

You don't have a single leg to stand on. And your rantings are so far left and often blindly partisan adhering your own ideology.

Kendra, do you have any support base besides this forum? Is there a website sponsored by some political action committee supporting your radical ideology? Do you have a circle of friends who think like you? Birds of a feather do flock together. What I don't understand is how you convince yourself that your radical bullshit is right.

-AA

And no, I am not a democrat, I am very much centrist, so save it. You don't have to be a "lefty" to realize the folly of that type of thinking.

In the end I believe that Bush will be the "Uniter and not Divider" he claimed to be. Just not in the way he envisioned.

Did anyone see Bush's news conference a little while ago? Helen Thomas totally pwned Bush! I can't find any links yet to her question and his response, but I totally died laughing watching Bush squirm.

Our occupation of Iraq is a strategic move that secures a safer future for the rest of the world.

if you can’t see Iran as a problem in the future if they don’t stop pursuing nuclear weapons you should have stopped reading long ago.

No, I don't. But I tend to not see points made by radical liberal's such as yourself who thinks anyone who supports Bush is a terrorist. Go troll elsewhere Libby.

-AA

You should try to get over your xenophobia and adopt a longer view.

Looking at the long term, i think the ends outweigh the means. The loss of life is for now at acceptable numbers.

I did not expect the Bush administration to layout a plan for strategic domination of the Middle East. But anyone that has studied American military history should have seen the obvious 'fringe benefit' of occupying Iraq.

It does not matter that Iraq did not attack us directly like Japan or Germany - what I was pointing out was our propensity of occupying countries for the long term regardless of who struck first. There are several countries that did not attack us but yet allows our military bases to occupy their soil.

And yes some country does HAVE to lead the world. It can't be the United Nations. The U.N. is a joke. The U.N. is a conglomerate of 3rd world countries who do nothing but leech off 1st world countries. Have any of you ever seen how the U.N. works? I doubt it. Can anyone tell me who chaired the commission of human rights during 2002? Or which country was put in charge of the non-proliferation committee?

Why should the most powerful country in history allow itself to be led by a group of 3rd world countries asking for handouts? Right now the United States of America is the 800LB gorilla in the worlds play ground. Much better than it being Russia, France, China or India.

-AA

I think anyone who supports Bush is a "traitor". Bush is a "terrorist.

As far as your request goes? Nope. I live in America. Where do YOU live?

See --there's this whole sticky thing about unprovoked attacking of other sovereign nations being a WAR CRIME.

That's fine if you're a Fascist Empire, but I'm American and I hold my country to higher standards than that.

This is the last time I will reply to you since conversations with you are in general worthless.

Bush is a terrorist *is* a radical view point.
People who support Bush are traitors *is* a radical view point.

You don't have a single leg to stand on. And your rantings are so far left and often blindly partisan adhering your own ideology.

Kendra, do you have any support base besides this forum? Is there a website sponsored by some political action committee supporting your radical ideology? Do you have a circle of friends who think like you? Birds of a feather do flock together. What I don't understand is how you convince yourself that your radical bullshit is right.

-AA

Iran is a problem that will take care of itself as long as we don't pull our usual cowboy shit and alienate Iran's youth. Young people in Iran are very progressive and very pro west. Part of what's happening in Iran right now is the older generation of hardliners trying to control their own population. They will age and die out and if we don't do something stupid (or I should say, anything else stupid), Iran won't be a hardline radical Islamic country for much longer. You should try to get over your xenophobia and adopt a longer view.

the problem is that the fundamentalist in Colorado and the Boy George W. Bush administration do not want the Iranian Youth to follow the European westernization, but their own Fundamentalist views.

I wish we had elected a historian for President. Then maybe we could have learned something from the British Empire's failures in the Middle East. Oh wait, we failed to learn anything from the French's mess in Indochina (Vietnam). Nevermind.

So who the hell appointed us to lead the world?

That type of attitude is no better than saying "Well Billy is bigger than you, so he gets to pick on whoever he likes, and if you don't like it, Billy will beat your ass."

It's fucking pathetic, and people who support such a mindset will lead us into another World War, and history will show us as the bad guy. Short-sighted, adult-aged adolescents.

Great.

Thanks fellow "Americans".

Paulie, your comments are not only those of a common thug, but of a sexist as well.

Welcome to Rome redux, I hope you people are happy when it collapses because of your testosterone-addled ideology.

And no, I am not a democrat, I am very much centrist, so save it. You don't have to be a "lefty" to realize the folly of that type of thinking.

The United Nations did not approve the attack. And we learned that the Bible Thumping Liar Boy George W. Bush lied about every thing when he made up his poor excuses to invade.

So we only act when the United Nations approves it?

I didnt vote for a single person in the U.N. to have any say in our countries politics.

The U.N. is a house of cards, it will fall soon. Thankfully #43 has sidelined that defunct organization.

-AA

First of all, the United Nations should be the organization to handle international disputes. I find it really funny that you believe that nations are not equal... They are.

I hardly think a third world country with an average yearly income (per person) of $350 dollars is equal to us.

I've actually been to the U.S. twice with my college as a "Model U.N. representative" in New York. Nations are innately unequal. U.N. tries to make things equal, but its kinda hard when 33 out of 36 countries appoints Libya to monitor human rights.

-AA