9/11 Conspiracy Video.

Yes, and that evidence is no more valid than the evidence supporting the official story.

And so you question the facts that are presented in the video --right?

The official story says a plane crashed into the pentagon. The evidence shown in the video contradicts that assertion by pointing out a 757 won't fit through a 16 foot hole, and that the engine recovered was from a military plane. That is only a single example of where the official story is clearly lacking.

All the phone calls from the planes were faked?

No, I challenge the evidence presented in the video; it's pretty thin on facts.


How is correcting your false assumption patronizing? When people write incorrect things, it's patronizing to correct them? Or is that only if you're being corrected?

I'm not being glib, or patronizing, I'm being correct. I wrote one thing; you wrote that I wrote another, entirely different thing. You were wrong, I was right. Get over it.

less thin than the "official" story.




stylistically you come across as an asshat.




see? asshat.

yep.

Not sure about that one. Theres claims that a voice manipulation facility _may_ have gotten involved. The main problem is, only one recording has ever been released. What happened to the rest of them?

Nope.


Because my "style" involves disagreeing with you? Must be nice to be right all the time.


Bullshit. Show me the airplane engine. Prove to me that it wasn't from a civilian plane.


Yes, but if you wear a tinfoil hat you'll be protected from the government-orchestrated terrorist plots.

Cell phones are very unreliable at high altitudes. This was brought up in the video. Also, they might have the ability to fake voices with a hi-tech device. It's in the video.

Did you watch the video? Its on there..

And you can prove the video wasn't faked?

The video provides footnotes so one can verify the veracity of the documentation.

The video makes wild accusations based on manipulated evidence. I have no more reason to believe the video than the Kean Commission.

There are many times I'm wrong. And when I am --I say so.

There are many people I disagree with that I enjoy bantering with who don't act like asshats. You just don't happen to be one of them.

Can you prove the official story wasn't faked then?

Of course i can't prove anything. I'm a simple man from the UK who was intruiged when i saw this vid and thought i would share it and get others points of view on the whole debacle..

I doubt you watched the video. If you ever do, I would doubt you can allow yourself to be unbiased.

The same could be said of the 9-11 Commission Report.

Well, that's certainly not true, because you haven't yet abot the question/publish thing, and I was clearly right there.


So again, proving you wrong makes one an "asshat". Got it.


I did watch it, and I think it's bullshit.

Exactly which parts of it seemed untrue?

The part of it on video.

Yes, there were no engines, or pieces of engines from the plane the government describes hitting the pentagon. There were pieces from something else. Thus far the government has not shown evidence of what they claim.

Make a claim, back it up. The government has not backed up their claim, so it is reasonable to investigate both why they didn't back up the claim and as to what really happened. If you want to make a counter claim that the government's story is true as is, then by all means try to back that up. If you're not out to prove anything, your opinion has no value.

Name the part, and how it was wrong.

I'm going to assume that in Bancroft-ese that means "You're right, I was wrong, I'm sorry."
Since you made up your own meanings for language before, I'm going to do it now. Turnabout's fair play.

So, apology accepted.