These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Fastest Nvidia I can get? |
|
|
Jack Digeridoo
machinimaniac
Join date: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 1,170
|
03-17-2005 11:40
What's the fastest Nvidia I can get for SL?
_____________________
If you'll excuse me, it's, it's time to make the world safe for democracy.
|
|
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
|
03-17-2005 13:35
Jack, it would be something in the GeForce 6800 Ultra family (one of the new ones with 512 megs of video memory) -- there are a number of variants from different companies -- but keep in mind that in addition to overclocking, you have to see if your computer has any other bottlenecks. Having a fast video card paired with a slow processor will reduce performance effectiveness.
IMGO it seems to me that the 6800 Ultras cost twice as much as a 6600 GT and don't perform at double the level. The 6600 GT is far better for the price/performance ratio and should be plenty fast for SL. Of course, this is anecdotal, I'd like to see more benchmarks specifically with SL in mind because most of the ones I've seen are for Doom III and Half-Life 2 and other games. ![]() _____________________
|
|
Kathmandu Gilman
Fearful Symmetry Baby!
Join date: 21 May 2004
Posts: 1,418
|
03-17-2005 19:38
Hard question to answer without knowing your system but duel 6800 ultras 512 in SLI on a PCIe bus would be the badest configuration right now (as in home PC). If that extra 5-10 FPS is worth the $1000 + mobo and CPU upgrades then rock on.
|
|
Hiro Pendragon
bye bye f0rums!
Join date: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,905
|
03-17-2005 23:18
Hard question to answer without knowing your system but duel 6800 ultras 512 in SLI on a PCIe bus would be the badest configuration right now (as in home PC). If that extra 5-10 FPS is worth the $1000 + mobo and CPU upgrades then rock on. I had a lot of good advice from people on the new computer I ordered... the PCI-E cards are the "GT" series... 6600GT / 6800GT... I checked out Tom's Hardware and saw that the 6800 really is a big jump from the 6600... but for $200 more? Right now the 6600GT is more than you'll need from all I've seen, even in 1200 resolution. For upgradability, you might think the 6800 is worth it, but consider the alternative route I'm going: I'm getting an SLI capable motherboard (Gigabyte's K8NXP-SLI ) which is reasonably priced, the 6600GT for $170ish, and in two or three years, when I need another kick up in graphics, I'll get another 6600GT. By then the 6600GT should be down to around $100 and it'll increase graphics 60-90%. Sounds like a great deal to me. Of course if you have the money to spend, you can go 6800GT now and another 6800GT later ... but can your CPU keep up? ![]() _____________________
Hiro Pendragon
------------------ http://www.involve3d.com - Involve - Metaverse / Emerging Media Studio Visit my SL blog: http://secondtense.blogspot.com |
|
Garoad Kuroda
Prophet of Muppetry
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 2,989
|
03-17-2005 23:20
SLI? Is that two cards for one display like the old Voodoo cards I once had could do? Didn't know they were still making cards that could do that...
Edit: BTW I'm on a pretty nice system with a 6800 GT, and while it's pretty good in general, it's still possible to get crappy framerates in cluttered areas. You'd probably have to spend so much money to eliminate lag entirely it wouldn't be worth it (if even possible). Wait a few years and then see if the lag can be destroyed completely...? For now I'd just get a "nice" setup and put up with the slowness in the really, really bad areas of SL. Unless you have like 5K burning a hole in your pocket. _____________________
BTW
WTF is C3PO supposed to be USEFUL for anyway, besides whining? Stupid piece of scrap metal would be more useful recycled as a toaster. But even that would suck, because who would want to listen to a whining wussy toaster? Is he gold plated? If that's the case he should just be melted down into gold ingots. Help the economy some, and stop being so damn useless you stupid bucket of bolts! R2 is 1,000 times more useful than your tin man ass, and he's shaped like a salt and pepper shaker FFS! |
|
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
|
03-17-2005 23:22
How IS SLI for SL, anyway? Has anyone actually done it yet?
I thought applications had to be specifically optimized for it? Please fill in the details... thankies. ![]() _____________________
|
|
Valdimir Statosky
Registered User
Join date: 10 Apr 2004
Posts: 32
|
03-17-2005 23:34
I got the 6800 Ultra by Asus on a Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe mother board with an AMD FX-55 and it running great, and have noticed a big decrease in the amount of lag that i experience also
|
|
Hiro Pendragon
bye bye f0rums!
Join date: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,905
|
03-17-2005 23:35
SLI? Is that two cards for one display like the old Voodoo cards I once had could do? Didn't know they were still making cards that could do that... Yeah... and in most cases you're squeezing almost a 100% upgrade in quality/speed. Edit: BTW I'm on a pretty nice system with a 6800 GT, and while it's pretty good in general, it's still possible to get crappy framerates in cluttered areas. Bad news: I'm pretty sure that's a SIM server issue, not a video card issue. (very) Good news: SL 1.6 blows away this kind of lag. _____________________
Hiro Pendragon
------------------ http://www.involve3d.com - Involve - Metaverse / Emerging Media Studio Visit my SL blog: http://secondtense.blogspot.com |
|
Jack Digeridoo
machinimaniac
Join date: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 1,170
|
03-18-2005 11:39
TY for great info. Looks like I need to get a new dual PCIe mobo. The one I have now only has 8x AGP. Does SecondLife FPS improve a lot with a SLI setup?
I love my framerate now @ 128m draw distance but I want 512m!!! ![]() _____________________
If you'll excuse me, it's, it's time to make the world safe for democracy.
|
|
Jack Digeridoo
machinimaniac
Join date: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 1,170
|
03-18-2005 13:43
Ok hypothetically speaking say if you won the lottery...
2 SLI'ed PCIe NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400's Would that be the best setup for SL @ 512m draw distance? Or Wildcat instead? http://www.3dlabs.com/products/product.asp?prod=293&page=2 Lindens what's your opinion on FASTEST card (not best consumer option). _____________________
If you'll excuse me, it's, it's time to make the world safe for democracy.
|
|
Kelly Linden
Linden Developer
Join date: 29 Mar 2004
Posts: 896
|
03-18-2005 15:19
For gaming you do not want quadro cards. These cards are designed around precision where you care much more about exactly where and how a pixel is aliased than you do about FPS. For good speed and quality in games you want to stick with standard GeForce's.
_____________________
- Kelly Linden
|
|
Kathmandu Gilman
Fearful Symmetry Baby!
Join date: 21 May 2004
Posts: 1,418
|
03-18-2005 15:50
Actually, the key isn't so much in the video card as it is in the CPU and memory of the computer. The better the video card, the more eye candy you can apply without affecting frame rate but you likely aren't going to see huge differences with the same basic settings applied. The difference between a Ti 4200, ATI 9800pro and a 6600gt as far as performance is concerned wasn't all that much until turning on FSAA and other goodies like local lighting and shine.
|
|
Jack Digeridoo
machinimaniac
Join date: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 1,170
|
03-18-2005 16:35
For gaming you do not want quadro cards. These cards are designed around precision where you care much more about exactly where and how a pixel is aliased than you do about FPS. For good speed and quality in games you want to stick with standard GeForce's. You mean I'll get lower FPS with 2 Quadro's or a Wildcat at 512m draw distance (compared to 6800 ultra)? _____________________
If you'll excuse me, it's, it's time to make the world safe for democracy.
|
|
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
|
03-18-2005 16:45
Actually, the key isn't so much in the video card as it is in the CPU and memory of the computer. The better the video card, the more eye candy you can apply without affecting frame rate but you likely aren't going to see huge differences with the same basic settings applied. The difference between a Ti 4200, ATI 9800pro and a 6600gt as far as performance is concerned wasn't all that much until turning on FSAA and other goodies like local lighting and shine. Hey Kathmandu, you've used all three of those cards with SL? Do you have more comparative benchmarks or any other experiences you can recollect pertaining to differences in performance between them? I'm especially curious in the diff. between the Ti4200 and the two-generations-later 6600 GT. Thanks! ![]() _____________________
|
|
Eggy Lippmann
Wiktator
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 7,939
|
03-18-2005 16:50
I'm on a crappy 5200 that's slowly dying from heat death.
SL works great! You should try being a hermit sometime. It will do wonders for your FPS. _____________________
|
|
Teeny Leviathan
Never started World War 3
Join date: 20 May 2003
Posts: 2,716
|
03-18-2005 18:15
I'm especially curious in the diff. between the Ti4200 and the two-generations-later 6600 GT. Thanks! ![]() No comparison. I started SL with a Ti4200, went to a 5600, then a 5700 Ultra and just recently upgraded to a 6600GT. The 6600GT lets me set my draw distance further. However, crowds will still drag down performance. The one real bonus I've enjoyed with the 6600GT is the ability to turn on FSAA with a minimal performance hit. ![]() _____________________
The Default Avatars were created by Linden Lab
They evolved. They rebelled. There are many copies. And they have a plan. |
|
Garoad Kuroda
Prophet of Muppetry
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 2,989
|
03-19-2005 13:24
Yeah... and in most cases you're squeezing almost a 100% upgrade in quality/speed. Bad news: I'm pretty sure that's a SIM server issue, not a video card issue. (very) Good news: SL 1.6 blows away this kind of lag. No, actually I'm pretty sure that what I'm talking about is on my end. I'm techie enough to be able to tell the difference. BUT, I think I found my problem, hehe... I was messing around with settings before and had my card's settings on: 8s Anti aliasing 16x Anisotropic filtering Kinda overkill, hehehe. Set them back to application controlled and now I'm getting 4-5 times more FPS. oops. _____________________
BTW
WTF is C3PO supposed to be USEFUL for anyway, besides whining? Stupid piece of scrap metal would be more useful recycled as a toaster. But even that would suck, because who would want to listen to a whining wussy toaster? Is he gold plated? If that's the case he should just be melted down into gold ingots. Help the economy some, and stop being so damn useless you stupid bucket of bolts! R2 is 1,000 times more useful than your tin man ass, and he's shaped like a salt and pepper shaker FFS! |
|
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
|
03-19-2005 14:26
No comparison. I started SL with a Ti4200, went to a 5600, then a 5700 Ultra and just recently upgraded to a 6600GT. The 6600GT lets me set my draw distance further. However, crowds will still drag down performance. The one real bonus I've enjoyed with the 6600GT is the ability to turn on FSAA with a minimal performance hit. ![]() Thanks Teeny! What do you usually have your draw distance set to, and what kind of framerate do you get typically? Also, what FSAA settings do you prefer? ![]() _____________________
|
|
Vlad Pacer
Registered User
Join date: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 8
|
03-19-2005 17:47
Keep in mind that the 6600 GT PCI-E card only had 8 pipe instead of the 16 pipes in the 6800 ...
|
|
Hiro Pendragon
bye bye f0rums!
Join date: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,905
|
03-19-2005 22:08
Keep in mind that the 6600 GT PCI-E card only had 8 pipe instead of the 16 pipes in the 6800 ... But still runs things like Doom 3 and Halflife 2 at a framerate well above what you'll need. This card's nice because it's less than half the cost of the 6800 and if you have a SLI ready motherboard, you can pop in another in a year or two and double your performance, cheaply. _____________________
Hiro Pendragon
------------------ http://www.involve3d.com - Involve - Metaverse / Emerging Media Studio Visit my SL blog: http://secondtense.blogspot.com |
|
Catherine Omega
Geometry Ninja
Join date: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 2,053
|
03-20-2005 04:06
But still runs things like Doom 3 and Halflife 2 at a framerate well above what you'll need. This card's nice because it's less than half the cost of the 6800 and if you have a SLI ready motherboard, you can pop in another in a year or two and double your performance, cheaply. Definitely, plus two 6600GT cards are faster AND cheaper than a single 6800, even when you consider the more expensive SLI motherboard. It's the performance difference between the 6600 and 6800 that seals it for me. In terms of price-to-performance, the 6600 is an incredible deal compared to its bigger cousin. _____________________
|
|
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
|
03-20-2005 04:35
Definitely, plus two 6600GT cards are faster AND cheaper than a single 6800, even when you consider the more expensive SLI motherboard. It's the performance difference between the 6600 and 6800 that seals it for me. In terms of price-to-performance, the 6600 is an incredible deal compared to its bigger cousin. Has anyone run SL on a SLI configuration with two 6600GTs yet? Any benchmarks, what's the performance ratio compared to running with a single 6600GT, etc.? I understand this is still new technology but of course, the phrase "incredible deal" gets my attention. I'm all for a good bargain, especially in a technological world where there is a heavy price premium on "top-of-the-line" stuff that will become obsolete yesterday anyway. ![]() _____________________
|
|
Alan Palmerstone
Payment Info Used
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 659
|
03-20-2005 04:57
Actually, the key isn't so much in the video card as it is in the CPU and memory of the computer. The better the video card, the more eye candy you can apply without affecting frame rate but you likely aren't going to see huge differences with the same basic settings applied. The difference between a Ti 4200, ATI 9800pro and a 6600gt as far as performance is concerned wasn't all that much until turning on FSAA and other goodies like local lighting and shine. You are right about that. I have run a Ti4400 (96-128 draw distance, no eye candy), ATI 9800 pro (128-192 draw distance, local lighting and shiny) and a 6800GT (160-400+ draw distance, everything but real water). Everything looked good and I got an acceptable frame rate with each card. I actually saw more improvement adding a faster CPU and upgraded memory (2.8 p4 533 to a 3.2 p4 800mhz, 1 gb pc 2100 ram to 1 gb pc 3200) If you have the means, I would certainly recommend the 6800 GT or Ultra. But if you cant afford $400 for a video card or think they are just plain overpriced, a new CPU/Motherboard combo in the 3ghz range and a gig of the fastest RAM will run you about the same money and give you much better bang for your buck. _____________________
Visit Parrot Island - relax on the beach, snuggle at the waterfall, ride the jetskis, make a movie and buy a pool!
|
|
Catherine Omega
Geometry Ninja
Join date: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 2,053
|
03-20-2005 05:00
Has anyone run SL on a SLI configuration with two 6600GTs yet? Any benchmarks, what's the performance ratio compared to running with a single 6600GT, etc.? I understand this is still new technology but of course, the phrase "incredible deal" gets my attention. I'm all for a good bargain, especially in a technological world where there is a heavy price premium on "top-of-the-line" stuff that will become obsolete yesterday anyway. ![]() I'm eager to hear about this too. SL isn't like Doom 3 or Half-Life, where the GPU is king. SL's CPU-bound, so the performance boost you'd see in SL from a P4 2.4Ghz with a GeForce 2 MX to a P4 2.4Ghz with a GeForce FX5900 isn't as great as one would see in a game like Half-Life 2. If SL's all you do, a single GeForce 6600GT is probably overkill, at least with the current renderer. It's still an excellent deal and if you get a PCI-express model, it's highly upgradable. Unfortunately, if you don't already have a PCIe motherboard, you'll need to take that into account. There ARE motherboards that have both an AGP and PCIe slot that one could purchase with future upgrades in mind, but they're pretty hacky, to be honest. _____________________
|
|
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
|
03-20-2005 05:06
Yeah, you know me, Cat... SL's all I do. *smiles*
Thanks again for being such a wonderful explainer. _____________________
|