Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

OS Landlords Adding to the Rip Off

Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
11-12-2008 10:34
From: Wildefire Walcott
If your openspace/homestead prices don't go up in January, it's because the estate owner had a steep profit margin at the old openspace prices and is going to absorb a significant margin reduction once the prices go back up.


In my case this simply isn't true. I pay VAT on my openspace which squeezes my margins. I'm fortunate I only got one, I was never keen on them in the first place. However the reason I'm not putting the price up is because I feel such an increase is plain wrong. I'll be running it at a loss and will have to make savings elsewhere, which will mean less inworld spending for me.
Wildefire Walcott
Heartbreaking
Join date: 8 Nov 2005
Posts: 2,156
11-12-2008 10:47
From: Ciaran Laval
In my case this simply isn't true. I pay VAT on my openspace which squeezes my margins. I'm fortunate I only got one, I was never keen on them in the first place. However the reason I'm not putting the price up is because I feel such an increase is plain wrong. I'll be running it at a loss and will have to make savings elsewhere, which will mean less inworld spending for me.

Well, as you said earlier, you only have one, and you'll be running this one at a loss. Even you shouldn't doubt that you're an exception to the norm in this case. No one who has 40+ openspace sims is going to run them at a loss.
_____________________
Desperation Isle Estates: Great prices, great neighbors, great service!
http://desperationisle.blogspot.com/

New Desperation Isle: The prettiest BDSM Playground and Fetish Mall in SL!
http://desperationisle.com/

Desperation Isle Productions: Skyboxes for lots (and budgets) of all sizes!
Lias Leandros
mainlander
Join date: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 3,458
11-12-2008 10:57
937 prims on the mainland is on $25 bucks. 3,750 prims is $75 bucks. Why would we pay double that price for the same amount of server resources? Since I am already premium I guess I will just give up the open sim and rent mainland. But I guess that was the goal of this latest Linden scheme.
_____________________

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bear/214/199/107
Join in SL open enrollment CLUB JOBS to announce new DJ and Host Jobs for free.
And on Avatar's United http://www.avatarsunited.com/groups/club-jobs
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
11-12-2008 10:58
From: Wildefire Walcott
Well, as you said earlier, you only have one, and you'll be running this one at a loss. Even you shouldn't doubt that you're an exception to the norm in this case. No one who has 40+ openspace sims is going to run them at a loss.


Absolutely, if I even had two it would start to get tricky.

The other side of the coin though is that those bigger estate owners who are in a position to lessen the blow have a business model more in tune with LL's rash decisions. I recall at an office hour with Jack he said a good rental model should see a ROI in six months. If he still thinks that then he probably doesn't understand what all the fuss is about.
Lat Lovenkraft
Registered User
Join date: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 8
One of the Most Important Informative Posts
11-12-2008 11:09
From: Lucinda Bergbahn
I know im not gonna get a popularity vote with this and yes of course there ae unscrupulous landlords in LS as there are in Rl, but I have been reading for a few days the comments about estate owners and no I am not an estate owner, but please think about things.

1. Estate owners had to take the risk and expense of buying a full sim in the first place.

2. If the estate owner is in Europe you can add 17-21% to their costs both in the initial set up and in the monthly tier.

3. IF they allow you to pay in Linden- a convenience to you.... they have to deal with exchange rates as well. This is an additional fee.

4. IF you pay your tier by PayPal there are costs the sim owner has to pay there maybe 3% or so.

5. You have the luxury of leaving that land without notice at anytime, but the estate owner still has to cover the tier costs the next month whether the sim is empty or full.

6. When you purchase a sim it takes time to recover your initial investment even if the sim is 100% occupied and few are.

7. Most of these estate owners recently dealt with LL lowering the cost of full sims and devaluing their assets by 40% overnight without any notice and then flooding the market with new sim sales because of the lower cost of buying one. LL did this without regard to the effects on the existing estate owners. If they had not yet recouped their initial investment this blow was multiplied.

8. Then when LL released the openspaces in a cheaper more attractive product the renters/consumers fled the parcels on full sims and begged for openspaces. Thus leaving estate owners with big occupancy issues and tier to pay regardless

9. Some estate owners were forced to convert full sims to openspace sims just to stay afloat much less stay competitive. I am not sure but I believe this was also at a cost or fee from LL and again if we are talking about a european owner we are also talking about VAT on top of those costs.

10. Those who had the full sim already have the cost of the openspace to bring online and that has to be recovered.

Estate owners are very much victims of LL in this whole fiasco that began even before openspace sims were made so attractive.

They have invested hugely in SL so you could have a nice private space apart from the mailnand to live and create and I know a lot of estate owners and few of them are "getting rich" on the backs of their renters. Most are just trying not to lose their butts.

If you bought an open sim for 24,000 linden and tier of 30k Linden a month and that was the going rate for a long time that I could see. Then assuming 1K linden is $4 usd that covered $96 of a 250 investment if they had a full sim already and a 1250 investment if they had to buy one.

If you paid rent of 30K linden a month it would take them approximately 3 and a half months to recover the initial investment of $250. If they had to buy a sim to be able to buy the openspace then it would take them 21 months to recover their cost of bringing them online before ever showing a single penny of profit and that does not include costs of paypal or vat or even exchange of linden.

It frustrates me to see resident against resident in all this. That is exactly what LL has tried to do all along in this. The estate owners are not the enemy in this LL is. The estate owners were the ones who believed enough in all our dreams to invest in the first place so that many of us who dont have the capital to invest could play. It is so easy to sit back and look and think they are getting rich off of their investments; but lets remember they carry all the risk and because LL makes willy nilly decisions without regard to any of us - those risks are sometimes very big.

I hope that we can remain solid- we are the ones who grew this grid 44% in land mass and it is our creativity that makes this a place people wanna come. Let us not turn against each other.

Sincerely,
Luci


Might I add:

11. Cost of Advertising (this is a major cost)

12. Cost of land improvements: i.e. Subdividing, landscaping, trees, structures

13. Average Vacancy time (ongoing)

14. Customizations
Gordon Wendt
404 - User not found
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 1,024
11-12-2008 11:29
Just an FYI every time you spam the forum with another pointless whiny thread about LL's openspace increase god kills a kitten. Now back to all your bitching and moaning.
_____________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/GWendt
Plurk: http://www.plurk.com/GordonWendt

GW Designs: XStreetSL

Michelle Thurston
Registered User
Join date: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 208
Spin Spin
11-12-2008 11:48
From: Lat Lovenkraft
Might I add:

11. Cost of Advertising (this is a major cost)

12. Cost of land improvements: i.e. Subdividing, landscaping, trees, structures

13. Average Vacancy time (ongoing)

14. Customizations

Dude, it's an 'important informative post' about why we shouldn't blame the estate owners by.......................an estate owner (at least somebody with enough circumstantial profile evidence to suggest)!

It hardly even says anything, just outlines the risks every retail land owner faces, regardless of whether or not they were taken in by Openspace regions. It's a plea for sympathy and an attempt to deflect what I feel to be a legitimate claim that some retail estate owners have some share of the blame by making an emotional appeal to remind us all of our common enemy: Linden Labs (Grrr!! Boo hiss). It's the sort of masterful PR spin people pay good money for. I would hire Lucinda to do PR for me, and I am 100% serious, because I DO need somebody and I recognize the skills.

Nobody is claiming that the land game is easy. I've been a part of it, indirectly as an employee and estate manager, and I know the ins and outs, and if you've been paying any attention to me the last few days you know I'm ALL about recognizing and mitigating risk. So I know what land people are up against.

But she missed a conclusion to be drawn from the point that the fact that LL constantly changes the 'rules', by which I mean price changes, product changes, new products, new continents, new ready-made areas, etc, of the land game: The fact that through ALL of that, land people STILL persist. The company they buy their land wholesale from is constantly screwing with them, yet they stick to it. Why? MONEY. Land retailers build castles on the shifting sands of not only the land market, but Linden Labs deliberate manipulation of the land market. Isn't that crazy? Why would anybody subject themselves to that?

Because, if you do it right, there is so much money. There are risks, but there are rewards, or it wouldn't be worthwhile. I know it sounds so basic but it's worth being said: No estate owner HAD to invest in openspaces. They did it because they wanted another product to leverage for profit. Nobody leased you an openspace region out of the kindness of their hearts or an altruistic desire to give everybody in the world their own little slice of paradise.

Granted, the margin on them is terrible.

Which is how we get to "It's basically like a full region, with maybe a couple less prims, and a HELL of a lot cheaper". Think they would have sold as well if people were honest with each other about what they were (I know, Ciaran, there was no policy)? Again, I'm not saying every estate owner or every 'real estate agent' did this, but some did, and they should be brought to account in the court of public opinion and inquisitive instant messages from people burned by them. Having the odds stacked against you, in a line of business you know to be risky, is no justification for acting improperly to move a product (I'm not accusing anybody specific here), regardless of whether or not you did your due diligence.
Bee Mizser
Registered User
Join date: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 329
11-12-2008 11:57
From: Puck Rickenbacker
I can understand the landlord passing on the increase. They aren't usually doing this for charity work. Adding even more profit in seems like cutting off your nose to spite your face, though. The mainland is so terrible, that I suspect anyone who's actually lived there will try to pay the increase, or get a smaller plot of estate land to help cut their cost.

All in all, LL sucks. This is a unethical, nasty way to make more money. It is, when all is said and done, a bait and switch job. They know how awful mainland is, and how so many people love SL and will not move to the crappy mainland, so they figure they can get by with it. Frankly, I hope there are some good lawyers on the case, because bait and switch is illegal, not just unethical.

Shame on you, LL. Shame on you. How do you sleep at night? How do you look in the mirror? Only cold, greedy people could live with doing this. The same kind of people who's greed has brought the USA to it's economical knees. Shame on you.


OK I have had enough about people slagging off mainland.

I live there (in Ingvar sim). I also own the land parcel that Dani's mainstore is on and a friends club is on. They are mainland too (in the Sea Monk sim).

Dani actually got complimented on her store during one of the halloween hunts because of how lag free it was. This hunt was very popular, and many stores on OS sims and on full private sims were lagged out.

Yes there are a few issues with mainland. Ban lines for example, however many estate lands have them too.

On the whole, I have had a very positive experience with mainland. It has been a pleasure to live there, we have had (on the whole) good neighbours, some of whom have become friends. I personally wouldn't live anywhere else (and yes before you ask I have lived on estate land.)

Also, do you know if LL was making a profit or a loss on OS sims? I don't and I suspect most of you don't either. So just saying greed without knowing the facts? You may be right, but on the other hand, they may have noticed that this is losing them money. Virtualisation is expensive (You forget they are talking a VMWare or Parallels licence for each box)

I think to get some clarity, because we all know this is about the bottom line and nothing else for LL, we need to know the figures.
Michelle Thurston
Registered User
Join date: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 208
11-12-2008 12:00
From: Bee Mizser
OK I have had enough about people slagging off mainland.
You're right, there's really nice mainland out there. I just think it's funny how two weeks ago mainland was the butt of a joke, but now it's being used in serious comparison like all the sudden it's more 'respectable'. 'omg you can get a mainland 4096 cheaper per prim than a nerfed openspace!!!!'..........yeah, but the whole point of the 'openspace' or 'homestead' is Living The Second Life Dream and having your own private island I thought.

But now all the sudden a mainland 4096 and a private island are comparable in our minds because it's convenient to make a point?
Briana Dawson
Attach to Mouth
Join date: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,855
11-12-2008 12:05
From: Gordon Wendt
Just an FYI every time you spam the forum with another pointless whiny thread about LL's openspace increase god kills a kitten. Now back to all your bitching and moaning.


Just an FYI, every time you a pointless message bitching about why you dislike people posting messages about things that concern and interest them god labels you an ass. Now go back to all your bitching and moaning about peoples bitching and moaning.
_____________________
WooT
------------------------------

http://www.secondcitizen.net/Forum/
Bee Mizser
Registered User
Join date: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 329
11-12-2008 12:05
I agree it is strange that the joke land I got for peanuts is suddenly being held up as the comparison.

But in all honesty, I'm fed up with the joke image of mainland. I lived on estate land, under at the time a very good landlord. And in all honesty he was good as a landlord. However he had to sell and I got some mainland.

I never looked back. I've been living on mainland now for a little over a year.
Lucinda Bergbahn
Registered User
Join date: 5 Jan 2007
Posts: 124
11-12-2008 12:25
Excuse me Michelle, I am not an estate owner- never have been. I rent. I do know a lot of really good people who own estates ranging in size from 1 sim to hundreds of sims and know some who have suffered great loss in this LL created land fiasco. I have personally owned and bought and sold both mainland and estate parcels lived in both places mainland and estate. And whether you own estate land or mainland there are always people ready to trash you and think that you are getting rich in sl- but in reality few are getting rich in sl and many are just breaking even or getting by the market is false not based on supply and demand - but subject to the whims of ll in both places. The only difference is that on the mainland LL has kept the tier consistent thus far. They have most def played with the supply and determined to keep prices low rather than letting them grow based on demand- thus creating a real economy and value.

I simply see the estate owners side which anyone could see if they care to look and I am against anything that attempts to have us as residents fighting each other when really we are not the enemy.

I would just like people to think about what those who have invested so much RL time money and effort into sl do for us and that is they allow those of us like myself who didnt have 1675 or 1000 or 2000 usd (if you are talking about mainland sims) to invest- those who have put their money in here to buy lands and then rent them have invested in the dreams of all of us. Now is not the time to trash them. And lets face it- it may be cheaper to be on the mainland as a renter or a parcel owner, but the mainland is not for everyone and cannot fill every land need there is in sl for people who do not want to or cannot invest in their own full sim.

Lastly, boo hiss if you will but if we are busy fighting each other and making each other the enemy then we are sure that LL will have their way and will have gained a lot of money selling something that is simply being given back to them and they have no cost of maintaining because people cant afford to keep them at 125 usd per month and we will forget about the real issue here which is for me that LL has needs to do the honorable thing and grandfather those who bought these sims over the past 5 months and make changes going forth. And that we must have some stability here. I read yesterday about a non profit project that was canceled because even though funding was approved for 16K USD they cant deal with the increase because grantors operate on annual funding basis. I personally know that it takes 6 months or so to get a grant for a project and people need to be able to plan. You cannot plan when someone does things like raising the rent 67% overnight no warning on an apartment they sold you yesterday for $75 a month.
Michelle Thurston
Registered User
Join date: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 208
11-12-2008 12:34
From: Lucinda Bergbahn
Excuse me Michelle, I am not an estate owner- never have been. I rent. I do know a lot of really good people who own estates ranging in size from 1 sim to hundreds of sims and know some who have suffered great loss in this LL created land fiasco. I have personally owned and bought and sold both mainland and estate parcels lived in both places mainland and estate. And whether you own estate land or mainland there are always people ready to trash you and think that you are getting rich in sl- but in reality few are getting rich in sl and many are just breaking even or getting by the market is false not based on supply and demand - but subject to the whims of ll in both places. The only difference is that on the mainland LL has kept the tier consistent thus far. They have most def played with the supply and determined to keep prices low rather than letting them grow based on demand- thus creating a real economy and value.

I simply see the estate owners side which anyone could see if they care to look and I am against anything that attempts to have us as residents fighting each other when really we are not the enemy.

I would just like people to think about what those who have invested so much RL time money and effort into sl do for us and that is they allow those of us like myself who didnt have 1675 or 1000 or 2000 usd (if you are talking about mainland sims) to invest- those who have put their money in here to buy lands and then rent them have invested in the dreams of all of us. Now is not the time to trash them. And lets face it- it may be cheaper to be on the mainland as a renter or a parcel owner, but the mainland is not for everyone and cannot fill every land need there is in sl for people who do not want to or cannot invest in their own full sim.
Ok, then I apologize for that. I just looked and saw you were the owner of something called "Bergbahn Land Management" (Group Charter "Residents and tenants of Bergbahn Land Management - Lucinda Bergbahn - owner";), and "Dynamo And Bergbahn Real Estate", and drew my own incorrect conclusion based on the specific and well-thought-out analysis of the retail estate game. I think given the circumstantial evidence it wasn't a huge leap to make.

But you can honestly argue that all retail estate owners are completely innocent in all this?

Yeah, LL made the policy shift, but a lot of retail estate owners didn't do their customers any favors to try and protect them. It might be counterproductive to point ALL the perfectly good rage at our fellow profit-seeking residents, but I think the argument can be made.
Ashe1 Writer
Searching & Seeking
Join date: 20 Jul 2007
Posts: 1,138
11-12-2008 12:50
From: nikita2 Denimore
A 20% exchange rate to US funds on the $111 tier i pay



*whistles...Wow, that should be illegal. :eek:

Ashe
Lucinda Bergbahn
Registered User
Join date: 5 Jan 2007
Posts: 124
11-12-2008 13:00
From: But you can honestly argue that all retail estate owners are completely innocent in all this?

Yeah, LL made the policy shift, but a lot of retail estate owners didn't do their customers any favors to try and protect them. It might be counterproductive to point ALL the perfectly good rage at our fellow profit-seeking residents, but I think the argument can be made.[/QUOTE


As I said, there will always be greed and unscrupulous landlords in sl as sl is simply a virutal environment where RL people come and interact. SL will always have the same mix of good and bad that we see in the real world and even perhaps more of the bad as anominity allows for a certain amount of freedom to do good and bad more so than in RL. However, I know people who had their assets in sl devalued overnight by 40% and few people in rl business could deal with that. For some this amounted to thousands and thousands of dollars.

I know estate owners that had no choice but to rent low prims to save their estates- their investments- to stay afloat- they didnt ask for that LL created that. I know estate owners that had no interest in renting low prim sims but were begged by friends to rent them one. I know estate owners that asked concierge about use of these sims before ever bringing them online.

I know estate owners that have them for nothing more than the public good- galleries- parklands, beautiful places of content and activity and they make no money on them at all. simply their play money covering the cost each month.

ALL I am saying here is before you go running to talk about how you are getting ripped off by someone charging you more than 75$ to rent one - look at what they had to do so that you could rent one- look realistically at how long it takes to recover costs. I dont believe people really look at these things - I dont really believe people look at how occupancy affects the estate owner and I dont think that people really think about how much the estate owners in SL contribute to the entire grid. I get so tired of hearing about the land barons. Where would we be without the people that were willing to invest in sl??

Not where would LL labs be - but where would we- the average jo's that come here to play and gather with friends and spread creative wings and all the other wonderful things that go on here.

ok off my soap box- im just asking people to think and that if that is to be boo hissed so be it. I said I didnt expect to win a popularity contest with that post- but I needed to say it.
Abigail Merlin
Child av on the lose
Join date: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 777
11-12-2008 13:50
From: Wildefire Walcott
It depends on the desired profit margins of the estate owner. Luckily for the prospective tenants of Second Life, you have thousands of estates to choose from.

I remember several estates who advertised on these very forums who were literally only making $5 USD a month profit on each openspace they owned. (And that's not even taking the $250 purchase price into account, since most of them didn't "sell" their parcels, they only charged rent; technically, all of them were set to operate in the red for the next FOUR YEARS assuming LL never raised the prices).

Someone who only makes $5 "profit" on a pure rental sim cannot continue to do business if the cost of that sim goes up by $20 in January (and then by another $30 in July). If your openspace/homestead prices don't go up in January, it's because the estate owner had a steep profit margin at the old openspace prices and is going to absorb a significant margin reduction once the prices go back up.

Not sure but I think that was me only the 5$ margin is not on rental but with upfront cost, pure rental I charged 95$ meaning I'd be in the red for about 8 months, looking back I'm lucky nobody wanted to rent but rather pay the upfront cost so the monthly cost was lower.

because I hardly advertise I currently only have 3 openspace sims, 1 person using 2 has indicated to want to move to a full sim on a rent basis, the money I safe from trading in the 2 openspaces for the full sim I use to lower the rent to a return of investment of about 8 months, the other person is subletting his openspace sim and is still deciding if she wants to pay the increased tier or choice another option (full sim with discount or 16k of land on one of my own full sims or just abandon)
Lias Leandros
mainlander
Join date: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 3,458
11-12-2008 14:16
From: Gordon Wendt
Just an FYI every time you spam the forum with another pointless whiny thread about LL's openspace increase god kills a kitten. Now back to all your bitching and moaning.
Gordon your bitching and moaning about bitching and moaning.

I do not believe that paying customers should just buckle under and accept whatever prices the service providers decides to spring on them. And many others feel the same way. You may happily pony-up the dough - but do let some of us attempt to save a few bucks here and there. This calls for the service providers to hear our voices - be they bitchy or not - and understand what our issues are and why a large number of us will not accept this arbitrary price increase.

.

.
_____________________

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bear/214/199/107
Join in SL open enrollment CLUB JOBS to announce new DJ and Host Jobs for free.
And on Avatar's United http://www.avatarsunited.com/groups/club-jobs
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
The Final Word???
11-12-2008 14:30
Is this the final word on the matter?

From: someone
Originally Posted by Zee Linden
[in /352/14/292421/2.html#post2218779/352/14/292421/2.html#post2218779]Ciaran - thanks for your message. We did change the pricing structure from Jack's original post in a post that Mark made. We are not planning to make further changes to the pricing in the post that Mark made, so for now, those are final.
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Gordon Wendt
404 - User not found
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 1,024
11-12-2008 17:16
Lias, neither do I however there are constructive threads (which I have no issue with) there's the Q and A thread (which obviously nobody can have issue with) and then there's the thousands of whiny threads that keep getting created so that nothing else shows up on the forums and the hijacking of other threads no matter what the topic to whine about the OS change.

From: Lias Leandros
Gordon your bitching and moaning about bitching and moaning.
I do not believe that paying customers should just buckle under and accept whatever prices the service providers decides to spring on them. And many others feel the same way. You may happily pony-up the dough - but do let some of us attempt to save a few bucks here and there. This calls for the service providers to hear our voices - be they bitchy or not - and understand what our issues are and why a large number of us will not accept this arbitrary price increase.
.


Edit: That's not even going into the fact that even the most optimistic people on this are all admitting that LL has stopped caring and is going to go through with this no matter how much people whine so all your doing is making your fellow residents suffer since you've pretty much taken away any non OS complaining use of the forums.
_____________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/GWendt
Plurk: http://www.plurk.com/GordonWendt

GW Designs: XStreetSL

Puck Rickenbacker
Registered User
Join date: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 55
11-12-2008 17:49
From: Bee Mizser
OK I have had enough about people slagging off mainland.

I live there (in Ingvar sim). I also own the land parcel that Dani's mainstore is on and a friends club is on. They are mainland too (in the Sea Monk sim).


LOL, my apologies for offending. I know there are decent areas of mainland, but I've lived there, and for smaller land owners out on their own, there's no protection from awful neighbors. You can suffer at any moment from ugly, from laggy scripts being plunked down, griefers showing up. Unless you can afford some 'buffer' space around you, you simply have to put up with whatever shows up next to you. Open water and lovely views are hard to come by, too. People can pop a casino/club next to your tropical space and tough tits for you, you'll have to listen to bints yelling all day and night saying stupid things.

I doubt I'd still be in SL if it wasn't for my little bit of quiet paradise. It's a refection of me. Of a life I once knew and miss. It's a place to let my muse come visit now and then and to build without lag or hassles. I'm not remotely interested in mainland. If it works for others, that's great, I wish all land owners there were as respectful of their neighbors as you are. But I'm not investing in a place where I can't be assured I'll love it tomorrow.
1 2