Land Market...........................................
I've been watching all of this carefully, with some interest.
I see a few things happening at once, and this is mainly based upon talking to people, plus a few *very* insightful former AOL employees who shall remain nameless by request.
Northern hemisphere winter is high season for online activities, period. People are shut in, it's dark and cold. By the time spring comes around they are dying to get outside and get some fresh air. AOL employees on the front lines saw similar trends going all the way back to the 80's.
Add mainland expansion to that, and you've got sudden oversupply. Plus, all those openspaces came on the market - and generally people don't go from 'no land' to openspace. They sell off and move, and the regions they came from now have even more land on the market.
One interesting factor: openspaces are only available through people with a full region already. That's arguably a *very* economy-stabilising move.
Think about it. Few will go from 295/mo to 370/mo - some will, but basically unless you are a baby land baron and renting, that's some serious change. Think of the new car you could get for 370/mo! So this heavily favours the land barons in terms of stability, if not profit.
* * * * *
Openspaces...........................................
Consider an openspace at 100 USD/mo from a land baron. Expensive, right? That's 25 bucks more than tier.
The land baron is gonna make 300 bucks for his trouble over the first year - but wait! He just bought the region for 250, so he only makes 50 bucks in the first 12 months if it's purely rented, no up-front fees.
Oh, and the tenant changed their mind at month six and the region sat empty for two months... the openspace is now a net loss of 100 USD at the one year mark.
Plus all the hours of dealing with people - you get to lose money *and* humbly serve people at the same time
I'm in no rush to roll out openspace regions for people, just for this reason. It's ***dangerously*** destabilising to do a lot of whole openspaces for people all at once. I'll charge a nonrefundable 150 USD fee up front, knowing that flips the 'typical scenario' net loss ever-so-slightly positive (50 bucks in the first year, say).
If anyone banks tier aside like I do, three months ahead - even with the up front fee and perfect tenant stability, charging 100/mo will still lose you 25 bucks at the end of the first year, because of the 75 * 3 months 'tied up'. Watch a lot of people with too many openspaces get in financial trouble, once the shiny wears off.
Would people be crazy enough to spend 150 USD for the privilege of a Caledon void? You betcha. I've got a long list that are willing to spend far more than that, going back two years now - the oldest on the list have been waiting since about last summer. Which basically ensures that Caledon stays financially stable: conservative growth for the win.
* * * * *
Financial stability...........................................
Long term, my strategy is to simply use a scarcity model - Caledon will be 'done' in just three more full regions (about 8% bigger than we are now).
That may:
- put the market over to the 'demand' side, making land fairly valuable
- valued land in turn bolstering confidence of residents (I pray it doesn't skyrocket in value; that would be problematic too for a community-minded area)
- not dilute our appeal over too much land
- spur some competition, which if I maintain market leadership, will also turn any Caledon-clones into ablative heatshields, burning up before I do if the market goes sour. So copy me! I'm just a wee bit evil like that...
I don't quite have the land list to fill the last three regions this instant - I possibly may just 'go for it' and get them, as there is always more demand for 'shiny new region' than there is for old. It's tempting.
* * * * *
A fix for Openspace financial stability...........................................
....and finally a gift for all the land barons out there: a possible financial model that may fix the openspace region financial instability problem.
Illustration of the problem: Openspace region at 100 USD/mo, first year:
Cost: 250
First year tier: 75 * 12 = 900
3 months tier reserves sequestered for emergency: 75 * 3 = 225
-------------------------------------
1375 in charges and sequestered reserves
First year revenue (flawless occupancy, no payments missed):
-------------------------------------
1200 USD
First year net loss:
-------------------------------------
175 USD
This could be mitigated by a 175 USD 'up front fee' but this also presumes that the hours you spend dealing with it all are worthless.
Second year (of flawless occupancy and payments) is better: a net gain of 300 USD.
Conclusion: After 24 months, 12.5 USD/mo profit if everything went PERFECT. Face it, that sucks!
So why would you rent out voids, when they are the financial risk-equivalent of giving the keys of your new car to a 16 year old boy on a Saturday night? It could go perfectly, but more likely you'll be paying dearly for busted fenders and insurance.
But there are other ways. Consider this: eight 2048m parcels on a void for $L 1000 a week each. Not unreasonable at all, for a small patch on secluded, wild waterfront and a buffer between neighbours!
Watch.
$L 8000 / wk * 4.333 weeks/mo = $L 34664 / mo.
$L 34664 / 265 * .965 (3.5% exchange rate on LindeX) = 126.23 USD/mo
126.23 USD - 75 USD monthly tier = 51.23 USD/mo income
51.23 USD/mo => 614.75 USD annual income.
If there is an up front fee of $L 8582 for each parcel ($L 4.19/m) the region has paid for itself. Sequester 3 months tier and the region still makes 389.75 annually the first year.
Sure, more small tenants is more work - but this is where economy of scale comes in. 10 such fully occupied openspace regions make 3897.50 annually the first year, then 6147.50 the second year, or a total of 10,045 USD at the 24 month mark. Not a bad hobby, and you get to have a 10 region mini-continent to play with. Well, kinda - there's no prims left over for you! Shave 5 prims off each of the eight parcels (468 prims -> 463 prims) and you'll have 40 prims for some low prim trees, a megaprim road, and so forth.
If you don't stay fully booked, survival breakeven (not valuing your time) is just below the 5 parcel mark.
Worth it? Quite possibly - script performance is lower on openspaces, but there are less avatars hanging around, and tons more land. Make a wild area, or perhaps cluster little towns in a beautiful, wide-open country - that's what I may be doing myself in 2009.