Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Opinions needed on a situation

Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
01-09-2009 21:26
I'd AR the twit for running a gambling operation, and give the loot to a worthy inworld cause, NCi or something like that, or hand it out to random new people.
Milla Alexandre
Milla Alexandre
Join date: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,759
01-09-2009 21:33
From: Paulo Dielli
You ask for our moral opinion on this issue. At the same time you knew that the owner had made a mistake, but you kept on playing and taking his money. Now you say you have no legal obligation to give it back.

I'm sorry, but both the owner and you are morally in fault here.


I agree with that......the time to be moral would have been when you first realized the mistake.....but since you kept playing....knowing full well you were 'getting away with something'.....why bother to tell the guy at all. Gambling was banned in SL.....this guy can't exavtly whine to LL about it......and you can't exactly cry morality here....so drop it.....take your false winnings and move on.
SuezanneC Baskerville
Forums Rock!
Join date: 22 Dec 2003
Posts: 14,229
01-09-2009 21:54
You should pay back the money you think is not rightfully yours, to the person you think it rightfully belongs to.
_____________________
-

So long to these forums, the vBulletin forums that used to be at forums.secondlife.com. I will miss them.

I can be found on the web by searching for "SuezanneC Baskerville", or go to

http://www.google.com/profiles/suezanne

-

http://lindenlab.tribe.net/ created on 11/19/03.

Members: Ben, Catherine, Colin, Cory, Dan, Doug, Jim, Philip, Phoenix, Richard,
Robin, and Ryan

-
Elanthius Flagstaff
Registered User
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,534
01-10-2009 00:45
Give the money back. Always try to do the right thing even if the person you are deadling with is an asshat.

As for continuing to play, I can understand that. Sometimes you wonder if there really is a bug or maybe you're just lucky. Sometimes you just want to double check to make sure the problem happens continually and wasn't a one off. Don't feel bad about replaying the game, but be nice, even to idiots.

Note: Can't say I always follow the letter of this guideline, but give it your best shot anyway.
_____________________
Visit http://ninjaland.net for mainland and covenant rentals or visit our amazing land store at Steamboat (199, 56).

Also, we pay L$0.15/sqm/week for tier donated to our group and we rent pure tier to your group for L$0.25/sqm/week.

Free L$ for Everyone - http://ninjaland.net/tools/search-scumming/
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
01-10-2009 01:06
This guy sure didn't make it easy for you to do the right thing, but yeah, the right thing is to give the money back. We all know that he's going to think "what a sucker!" when he hears the big "ka-ching", but that doesn't matter and no amount of explanation would make him think otherwise.

In the long run, he won't go far. A fool and his money, etc. This time it was only L$9K. Wait until the games scripter flips that remote switch that sucks dry all the casino operators' L$ balances.
Dog Galicia
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 177
gambling
01-10-2009 01:16
Gambling feeds off greed. People who gamble and people who run gambling joints know the risks, as each tries to scam the other. It's an age old practice. I say since this particular practice is outlawed in sl, whatever you paid in keep and donate the remainder to some place in sl that you and others can visit and enjoy. Notecard the owner, telling him what you've done and tell him it's his little contribution to the environment of sl. Retain a notecard and all his responses for any fallout. Be the conscience of the gambling fraternity.
PeterPan Price
Enthusiastic Amateur
Join date: 20 Nov 2007
Posts: 178
01-10-2009 01:42
First. I got no moral views on gambling. Its your money; you can spend it any way you choose.

Second. If there is even a tiny element of skill, then technically its not gambling and thus not illegal. (but, if if the "luck" element depends on which numbers come up, then it is possible for the owner to set the machine so that the chances of winning are much smaller than they should be. So be careful)

Third. I always like to hear both sides of a story. I would have liked to hear the owners version of events as well.

Finally. In answer to your question. If you were as honest as you say and the owner was as rude and threatening as you say, then give your winnings to charity and tell him that you have done so.
Lauralynne Cuddihy
Registered User
Join date: 28 Nov 2006
Posts: 163
01-10-2009 03:26
Alright... first of all folks... the machine/game the OP was playing is "LL approved/allowed" or however you want to word it, and NOT considered "gambling" in the legal eyes of Linden Labs.

I was online when this all went down. I do NOT know the OP. But I was able to view a group chat that most gaming place owners belong to, when this went down. The game owner in question did NOT become involved in the chat. A friend of said gaming owner came running into the group exploding about what happened, named the OP in this group chat and went on to moan and groan on behalf of friend who is the gaming owner at fault.

90% of the FELLOW GAME OWNERS... immediately shot back stating it was the gaming owners fault for not checking their machines. That gaming owner (through said friend), stated they had too many machines to check each one.

Well then the game owner should buck up and shut up and admit it was an honest mistake. Not to mention be grateful they didn't lose their prospective booties! Blaming a player for something you did wrong to begin with, is gonna shut your business down faster then anything else. Word of mouth travels fast here and that screams "dishonest" owner, for not admitting their mistake.

To the OP... how about offering back half the winnings and calling it even?! As for blacklisting you to ALL gaming owners... read what I wrote above and think again.

Good luck!
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
01-10-2009 03:27
From: SuezanneC Baskerville
You should pay back the money you think is not rightfully yours, to the person you think it rightfully belongs to.
You mean the gamblers who lost the 9000L to the casino owner in the first place? :D

Whether it's "legally gambling" or not, these games wouldn't still be in operation if they weren't massively biased against the players in the first place.
_____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/

"And now I'm going to show you something really cool."

Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23
Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
01-10-2009 04:13
From: PeterPan Price
Second. If there is even a tiny element of skill, then technically its not gambling and thus not illegal.
Depends what "illegal" means. The UIGEA doesn't define gambling at all, leaving it up to existing laws of states and localities--which pretty much means that if a game would be considered gambling anywhere in the US, it's going to be a problem. (Note that one of the law's main targets is online poker, which requires a hell of a lot more skill than these thinly veiled SLot machines.)

But it's not the gambler, nor the gaming operator, nor even Linden Lab that will get a visit from the Feds, once the UIGEA is actually enforced; rather, it's the US credit card companies and PayPal--the lifeblood of LL's revenues. Last I read, they have until December 2009 to comply, despite the act becoming law back in 2006. Once real enforcement starts, it seems likely that G-Team's lax and capricious interpretation of "skill" will evaporate overnight--along with all the gaming machines.

If, however, I were the sort to wager, I'd bet that before that happens, the game scripters will realize the jig is up. And then the casino operators will learn what PERMISSION_DEBIT actually means, with whatever they haven't yet cashed-out or transferred to alts.
Amaranthim Talon
Voyager, Seeker, Curious
Join date: 14 Nov 2006
Posts: 12,032
01-10-2009 05:45
From: Jupiter Schmooz
Or keep the winnings where you exceeded the score, and then do what someone else said and donate the balance to an SL build or charity. Then send the casino owner a note telling him where "his" money went in case he still wants to recoup it...

This has my vote.

I wd not AR the gambling though because u shd have known u werent supposed to be doing it- a little like the guy who calls the cops after a drug deal gone sour..
_____________________
"Yield to temptation. It may not pass your way again. "
Robert A. Heinlein




http://talonfaire.blogspot.com/

Visit Talon Faire Main:
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Misto%20Presto/216/21/155- Main Store

XStreets: http://tinyurl.com/6r7ayn
Salvador Nakamura
http://www.sl-index.com
Join date: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 557
No, Nevah, Njet, Nee, Nein, Lo, ....
01-10-2009 06:02
i "bet" in the loong end, you still lost more then you won, and he won more then he lost by this Mistake.


IMO: there's a group of people you never have to feel sorry for in any case, to name a few: pimp's, drug dealers and casino owners !


* indeed if you dont feel right about the L$ , donate it to a (RL) charity, im guessing they too are hurting in the current crisis



.
_____________________
SL-Index , providing an easy and affordable start in secondlife
Rentals, Easy Setup Scripts, Freebies & Value Boxes

www: http://sl-index.com

HQ: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Immintel/212/14/100
Cortex Draper
Registered User
Join date: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 406
01-10-2009 07:34
Whenever a person makes a mistake on setting the price of their land FAR too low, most people agree that the buyer should sell back the land at the same price.

This sounds like a similar situation - someone made an obvious mistake so its wrong to take advantage of it.
Ephraim Kappler
Reprobate
Join date: 9 Jul 2007
Posts: 1,946
01-10-2009 07:34
From: JayEvan Gothly
... I have a conscious ... but will have a clear conscious ...

I think you mean conscience, which is that thing people like George W. Bush very probably don't have, as opposed to consciousness, which is that thing people like George W. Bush shouldn't have.
3Ring Binder
always smile
Join date: 8 Mar 2007
Posts: 15,028
01-10-2009 09:13
From: JayEvan Gothly
What do you guys reckon I should do?

it's gambling. the owner took a gamble, and lost. oh well. enjoy your win. too bad you stopped. you could have had 100k before it was all over.

next time, TP in all your friends! :D

also, don't worry about being banned. just bring your alt instead.
_____________________
it was fun while it lasted.
http://2lf.informe.com/
Cappy Frantisek
Open Source is the Devil!
Join date: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 400
01-10-2009 09:31
From: JayEvan Gothly
Well I got a reply from him which wasn't very nice saying that if I didn't pay all the money back that I would be banned and he would tell all the other games places to ban me as well.

All the other game places? In the whole expanse of SL? I doubt it could be done. His mistake, keep the $L.
Baloo Uriza
Debian Linux Helper
Join date: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 895
01-10-2009 14:10
From: PeterPan Price
Second. If there is even a tiny element of skill, then technically its not gambling and thus not illegal.


You couldn't be more wrong. All forms of gambling, including those involving skill (poker, chess, etc), are prohibited in the US. Additionally, so is gambling using a debt instrument (ie, credit card). There were attempts to legalize skill-based gambling online in 2007, however, these soundly failed.

Some states also expressly prohibit online gambling at the state level, while others allow licensed casinos only, and the law doesn't stop at the login screen. People seem to forget that local RL law still applies in SL (and I for one can't wait for a bunch of vendors to get nailed for operating businesses without a license and failing to report income as applicable... there's some days I wonder if I'm the only licensed business that isn't a multinational corporation in SL).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_gambling#Legality
Baloo Uriza
Debian Linux Helper
Join date: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 895
01-10-2009 14:13
From: Lauralynne Cuddihy
Alright... first of all folks... the machine/game the OP was playing is "LL approved/allowed" or however you want to word it, and NOT considered "gambling" in the legal eyes of Linden Labs.
From: someone


Citation from a credable (ie, Linden) source needed.
Jezebella Desmoulins
Registered User
Join date: 4 Nov 2005
Posts: 561
01-10-2009 16:05
From: Cortex Draper
Whenever a person makes a mistake on setting the price of their land FAR too low, most people agree that the buyer should sell back the land at the same price.

This sounds like a similar situation - someone made an obvious mistake so its wrong to take advantage of it.


O RLY?

Most of the comments I've read on this topic over the years say that it's SELLER BEWARE and before you set land for sale you'd better check, recheck, and check your price again because there is no way to compel anyone in SL to reverse a transaction just because you screwed up.

Similarly, if you're going to set a scripted device out that's going to pay L$ out of your pocket whoever comes along based on some predetermined criteria, you'd better check, recheck, and check your scripts again. The game owner in this case was negligent in that regard, and if the statement credited to him that he has "too many" machines and is "too busy" to check them all is true, he is foolish as well.
Lauralynne Cuddihy
Registered User
Join date: 28 Nov 2006
Posts: 163
01-10-2009 16:50
From: Baloo Uriza
From: Lauralynne Cuddihy
Alright... first of all folks... the machine/game the OP was playing is "LL approved/allowed" or however you want to word it, and NOT considered "gambling" in the legal eyes of Linden Labs.
From: someone


Citation from a credable (ie, Linden) source needed.



You should well know that Linden Labs refuses to post a list of "approved" or "legal" in their eyes, games in Second Life. But I have been personally told by a few Lindens that the game in question is "fine".

However... some bottom line proof that they ARE acceptable is the fact that over the last 18 months since the "gambling ban" ... these "games", as well as others, have been AR'd over and over again. Yet Linden Labs has allowed these games to stay.

So, whether individuals agree with with what is or is not "gambling", isn't the question. It's what Linden Labs and their legal team decides. 18 months and going, should answer that question.
Baloo Uriza
Debian Linux Helper
Join date: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 895
01-10-2009 20:34
From: Lauralynne Cuddihy
You should well know that Linden Labs refuses to post a list of "approved" or "legal" in their eyes, games in Second Life. But I have been personally told by a few Lindens that the game in question is "fine".


Note that your average Linden isn't a lawyer.

From: someone
However... some bottom line proof that they ARE acceptable is the fact that over the last 18 months since the "gambling ban" ... these "games", as well as others, have been AR'd over and over again. Yet Linden Labs has allowed these games to stay.

So, whether individuals agree with with what is or is not "gambling", isn't the question. It's what Linden Labs and their legal team decides. 18 months and going, should answer that question.


Note that your average g-team member is not a lawyer.
Askandi Ansar
Sex God
Join date: 4 Dec 2008
Posts: 89
01-11-2009 01:32
The game being there despite LLs supposed banning of gambling - FAIL
Casino owner putting up flawed game - FAIL
OP gambling at all - FAIL
OP continuing to gamble after realising the game is flawed - FAIL
OP not telling all his friends about the flawed game - FAIL
OP telling casino owner his game is flawed - FAIL
Casino owner getting shitty with OP - FAIL
OP not giving some of the money back - FAIL
OP posting here about it - FAIL
Everyone else getting their panties in a bunch about it here - FAIL

But most of all

OP not saying (even if he lied) that he had given the money to charity thus giving himself the moral high ground - FAIL
Askandi Ansar
Sex God
Join date: 4 Dec 2008
Posts: 89
01-11-2009 01:36
From: Baloo Uriza
Citation from a ***credable*** (ie, Linden) source needed.
I love it when pretentious people try to use clever words and spell them incorrectly. It makes them look twice as bad.
Crighton Johin
Frell Me Dead
Join date: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 555
01-11-2009 01:46
From: Baloo Uriza
Never mind if their IMs are capped, they're not getting the notecard. Worse yet, no email with the message if they have IMs go to email.


If IM's are capped, a notecard will still get through because it is inventory. Everyone who has any type of business in SL will always ask for notecards if their IMs get capped. The reason is that notecards will always make it through. Well.....in theory they will....lol.
Yngwie Krogstad
Registered User
Join date: 7 Jun 2006
Posts: 233
01-11-2009 08:13
First off, if the guy owns too many machines to check, that's hogwash. He was there when he set the score that low, wasn't he? You check it at the time you screw up, you're already dealing with the machine.

Secondly, since you stated that you realized very early on that it was too low, why'd you keep playing it? If you were that concerned about doing the right thing, that would have happened the instant you realized that he forgot the last 9. This whole post reeks of dishonesty.

Since the guy was such a jerk when you did inform him, I would do what other people had said, donate the winnings to charity. Relay For Life would be a good one.
1 2 3