Best Graphics Card?
|
|
Teeny Leviathan
Never started World War 3
Join date: 20 May 2003
Posts: 2,716
|
11-09-2007 11:20
From: Debbie Trilling I run 2 x nvidia 8600 GTS in SLi.
SLi itself appears to me to make little discernable difference in SL. However, it makes a big difference in *some* other games. The two graphics cards, however, do allow the running of multiple monitors without any impact on SL. This bears repeating. SLi offers no real benefit to SL. I'm running with two 8800GTS cards, and the performance increase was negligible. Don't even bother with SLi if SL is the only game (or PLATFORM) you play. From: Debbie Trilling EDIT: if you do go the 8800 or 8600 route, especially if in SLi, you should first check that your existing PSU Unit is adequate as they require significant additional power over other cards. . You can do this using a PSU Calculator like the one here: http://www.extreme.outervision.com/psucalculatorlite.jspI was using a 550w power supply before I added the second card. I could power both with the 550, but It was JUST enough to get by Eventually, I got a secondary power supply that now occupies a 5.25" drive bay. This is the one I bought. It seems to work just fine. http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0241876
_____________________
The Default Avatars were created by Linden Lab They evolved. They rebelled. There are many copies. And they have a plan.
|
|
Katier Reitveld
M2 News Manager
Join date: 13 Sep 2005
Posts: 412
|
11-09-2007 11:21
You biggest bottleneck is your CPU, it's AWFULL.
Ignore your graphics ( one 6600 is in fact quite reasonable in SL ), ignore your ram ( 2gig is plenty ) but get that CPU changed ASAP it's a trully dated and poor performing 'thing'.
New mobo, Core-Duo CPU and you'll be set, if you are considering a graphics upgrade too then something like a 7950 Nv or X1950 ATI will be fine ( for SL the Nv will marginally outperform ). Unless your planning on upgrading to Vista then you don't need a DX10 card, SL will NEVER support DX10 as it's a OGL multi-platform environment so isn't going to change ( I say that with confidence because if they did it would mean supporting DX10 under vista and OGL (and possibly DX9) in all other environments ( Mac, Linux ) - give OGL is crossplatform they'll stick with it.)
|
|
Okiphia Rayna
DemonEye Benefactor
Join date: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 2,103
|
11-09-2007 11:22
From: Chosen Few In most cases, when you read stuff like that, it's bogus. Lots of times, they say stuff like "the eye can only detect 24 FPS", which is completely untrue. People just know that number because that's the rate that movie cameras operate at. That's not the only number that tends to get spouted, by the way. It's just an example of one of the common ones. The truth is the eye does not actually operate in frames, so there's really no way to answer the question of how many FPS the eye can detect. I guess if you really wanted to measure, you'd have to clock how quickly a photo-receptor cell on the retina can fire (which is primarily a chemical reaction), how fast can the nervous system transmit the info to the brain (which is primarily electrity), how fast can the vision center make sense of it (no idea what's involved there), an how fast can it inform your conscious mind what it's seeing (again, no idea what's involved with that). I'd imagine the answer to all that is "pretty damned fast". But precisely how fast, I don't think anyone knows for sure. You might as well ask what is the speed of thought? The question can't be answered. There's a pretty good article on how we perceive FPS at http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htmcool i'll take a read ^^ I was under the impression that the human eye worked in 'pseudo-frames' since its taking an imprint of the light patterns visible and then you're interpretting them (Or something similar).... ^^
_____________________
Owner of DemonEye Designs Custom Building and Landscaping Owner and Blogger, Okiphia's Life http://okiphiablog.blogspot.com/ 
|
|
Resolver Bouchard
Registered User
Join date: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 89
|
11-09-2007 11:23
I would go for a single 8800GT, very good performance (comparable to the GTX) for a lot more reasonable price, also power efficient as well, so you may not have to upgrade your power supply if you decide to go SLI.
SL uses openGL not DirectX, whether the card is DirectX 10 compatible or not is irrelevent.
Another thing to bare in mind is SL looks terrible compared to modern games no matter what hardware you run it on.
|
|
Okiphia Rayna
DemonEye Benefactor
Join date: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 2,103
|
11-09-2007 11:26
From: Resolver Bouchard SL uses openGL not DirectX, whether the card is DirectX 10 compatible or not is irrelevent. True, however, though it might not matter for SL (The app asked about), its unlikely that it will only EVER be used for SL, as spending so much money on a single-app machine is kinda.. not so common. Its better all-around if you are capable of DX10 on your machine, as if anything changes or you want to run something that requires it, you can. DX is used in a *lot* of things, and so... well.. its just logical to have it in my opinion ^^
_____________________
Owner of DemonEye Designs Custom Building and Landscaping Owner and Blogger, Okiphia's Life http://okiphiablog.blogspot.com/ 
|
|
Resolver Bouchard
Registered User
Join date: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 89
|
11-09-2007 11:30
From: Okiphia Rayna True, however, though it might not matter for SL (The app asked about), its unlikely that it will only EVER be used for SL, as spending so much money on a single-app machine is kinda.. not so common. Its better all-around if you are capable of DX10 on your machine, as if anything changes or you want to run something that requires it, you can. DX is used in a *lot* of things, and so... well.. its just logical to have it in my opinion ^^ I completely agree.  Some would argue you should get one of the new ATI cards which supports DirectX 10.1, but I would stick to Nvidia for the better performance and driver stability.
|
|
Okiphia Rayna
DemonEye Benefactor
Join date: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 2,103
|
11-09-2007 11:31
From: Resolver Bouchard I completely agree.  Some would argue you should get one of the new ATI cards which supports DirectX 10.1, but I would stick to Nvidia for the better performance and driver stability. I've always used Nvidia myself... never had an ATI.. so i can't compare the two ^^
_____________________
Owner of DemonEye Designs Custom Building and Landscaping Owner and Blogger, Okiphia's Life http://okiphiablog.blogspot.com/ 
|
|
Chosen Few
Alpha Channel Slave
Join date: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 7,496
|
11-09-2007 11:33
From: Teeny Leviathan This bears repeating. SLi offers no real benefit to SL. I'm running with two 8800GTS cards, and the performance increase was negligible. Don't even bother with SLi if SL is the only game (or PLATFORM) you play. I'm guessing it varies from system to system, probably dependent on many factors. As I said, I get about a 30% FPS boost in SL with SLI turned on. My understanding is that programs do not need to be written in any particular way to "take advantage" of SLI. The software doesn't even have to be aware of SLI at all. At the hardware level, SLI it takes each frame and divides the pixels between the two cards so that each one renders half the scene. The result is you can draw twice as fast. I'd have a hard time imagining that there would be any program that wouldn't benefit from that. If someone knows more about the subject than I do though, please chime in and edumacate me. 
_____________________
.
Land now available for rent in Indigo. Low rates. Quiet, low-lag mainland sim with good neighbors. IM me in-world if you're interested.
|
|
Okiphia Rayna
DemonEye Benefactor
Join date: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 2,103
|
11-09-2007 11:35
From: Chosen Few I'm guessing it varies from system to system, probably dependent on many factors. As I said, I get about a 30% FPS boost in SL with SLI turned on. My understanding is that programs do not need to be written in any particular way to "take advantage" of SLI. The software doesn't even have to be aware of SLI at all. At the hardware level, SLI it takes each frame and divides the pixels between the two cards so that each one renders half the scene. The result is you can draw twice as fast. I'd have a hard time imagining that there would be any program that wouldn't benefit from that. If someone knows more about the subject than I do though, please chime in and edumacate me.  I was under the impression SLI was used in different ways based on 'preferences' within software and hardware. Diff mobos and processors would use it different, and some apps might be written to take advantage of it as well... I could be wrong though, I enjoy computers but I'm not A+ certified (yet) or anything, so.. my word is not fact =P
_____________________
Owner of DemonEye Designs Custom Building and Landscaping Owner and Blogger, Okiphia's Life http://okiphiablog.blogspot.com/ 
|
|
Teeny Leviathan
Never started World War 3
Join date: 20 May 2003
Posts: 2,716
|
11-09-2007 11:48
From: Chosen Few I'm guessing it varies from system to system, probably dependent on many factors. As I said, I get about a 30% FPS boost in SL with SLI turned on. I stand sort of corrected. There are no absolutes when it comes to system performance in SL. I suspect that in my case, I am hampered by my Comcast cable connection, which has been a mixed bag of good and bad the last couple of years. The end result of this is that the performance "benefit" I get running SL with SLi is at best 10%. Until more broadband options become available to my neighborhood, I'm stuck with Comcast.
_____________________
The Default Avatars were created by Linden Lab They evolved. They rebelled. There are many copies. And they have a plan.
|
|
Klang Wopat
"The Consultant"
Join date: 19 Sep 2006
Posts: 212
|
Quick Note
11-09-2007 12:48
Windows XP Pro SP2 will only address 3.5 Gb of RAM.
SL will only utilized up to 2 Gb of RAM.
So, run XP, SL, and have a couple of browsers open, and you're probably going to use all of it up to the 3.5 limit.
BTW--I upgraded to 4 gigs, to utilize four 1 gig sticks I had.
|
|
Annie Liberty
Registered User
Join date: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 20
|
11-09-2007 12:54
Could someone explain to me what SLi is? Feeling very ignorant here, but am looking at having a new pc built for me, and want to know all pertinent info 
|
|
Katier Reitveld
M2 News Manager
Join date: 13 Sep 2005
Posts: 412
|
11-09-2007 13:10
From: Annie Liberty Could someone explain to me what SLi is? Feeling very ignorant here, but am looking at having a new pc built for me, and want to know all pertinent info  SLi is a Nvidia system where you can pair two graphics cards together for improved performance. Unless you get a bargain pair of cheap graphics cards (or run massively intensive games on huge monitors ) it's not really worth the money and your better off with a single better card. ATI also have a version who's name escapes me which is technologically better.
|
|
Steve Mahfouz
Ecstasy Realty
Join date: 1 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,373
|
11-09-2007 13:20
From: Katier Reitveld SLi is a Nvidia system where you can pair two graphics cards together for improved performance.
Unless you get a bargain pair of cheap graphics cards (or run massively intensive games on huge monitors ) it's not really worth the money and your better off with a single better card.
ATI also have a version who's name escapes me which is technologically better. Crossfire is the word you are looking for.
_____________________
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Ecstasy/128/129/31 Ecstasy: high quality residential living
|
|
Ashley Ennui
Registered User
Join date: 15 May 2005
Posts: 141
|
ATI's is crossfire
11-09-2007 13:25
a little bit disingenuous to say it is "technologically superior" considering the cards used could be called technologically inferior...
the nvidia 8xxx stream processors are a LOT more efficient than the ones ati is using...thats why ati cards have such a massive number of them in comparison, and also why they have higher power consumption than a comparable nvidia card.
and honestly, it is all a matter of preference really.
_____________________
Love you, Kitten and Stephani.
|
|
Katier Reitveld
M2 News Manager
Join date: 13 Sep 2005
Posts: 412
|
11-09-2007 13:42
From: Ashley Ennui a little bit disingenuous to say it is "technologically superior" considering the cards used could be called technologically inferior...
the nvidia 8xxx stream processors are a LOT more efficient than the ones ati is using...thats why ati cards have such a massive number of them in comparison, and also why they have higher power consumption than a comparable nvidia card.
and honestly, it is all a matter of preference really. Wasn't implying the quality of the cards in question just the bit that does the SLi/Crossfire bit. But anyway that's a side issue, the issue with the OP is definatly the CPU not the graphics initially.
|
|
Ashley Ennui
Registered User
Join date: 15 May 2005
Posts: 141
|
 yeah
11-09-2007 13:58
im not trying to start anything...i just love getting into techie stuffs...  i found my amd fx5200 dual, oc'd 8% with the asus utility runs really well, and the asus coolcube or whatever its called keeps it 10-15 degrees cooler than the stock heatsink and fan. i built my machine with an antec 650 trio, the asus crosshair, amd fx5200, 2 gb of corsair 6400/800mhz with the fan setup, a single evga 8800 gts 640 mb, stock clock settings, one 500gb sataII drive and twin 120mm case fans, and xp pro, it runs cool and even with the dual monitors i havent seen anything it doesnt shrug off with ease... my SL frame rates with a bunch of other browsers and messenger open are usually high 60's to low 90's... edit* (oh, and going from my athlon 3700 to the 5200, i dont ever get the processor pegged at 100% anymore...the 5200 sometimes one core is up to 50%...usually they cruise in the 20's) **second edit** for the cost of the second card, (sli) you can instead get http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115017Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz 2 x 4MB L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor it will work on your motherboar and will help the performance a bit i think...i could be wrong...
_____________________
Love you, Kitten and Stephani.
|
|
Usagi Musashi
UM ™®
Join date: 24 Oct 2004
Posts: 6,083
|
11-09-2007 17:16
Some system see the 4 giga some don`t to each their own
|
|
Rock Ryder
Registered User
Join date: 6 Oct 2006
Posts: 384
|
11-11-2007 03:27
From: Markubis Brentano Hi Rock,
I found your FSB speed. It will supports a FSB of 1066/800 MHz
But when I went to the memory manufactureres online, I couldn't find your motherboard model (Microstar MS-7160) in their drop downs, so I'm not sure what actual type of RAM they are specifying to use with that motherboard.
EDIT:
Found it
Main Memory • Supports dual channel DDR2 533/667, using four 240-pin/1.8V DDR2 DIMMs • Supports the memory size up to 4GB
Now the question is: Are you using the DDR2 memory? Yep, DDR2 memory. Rock
|
|
Rock Ryder
Registered User
Join date: 6 Oct 2006
Posts: 384
|
11-11-2007 03:40
Wow,
So a Pentium 4, 3.8Ghz motherboard, bought 7-8 months as the Ultimate gaming machine, is my problem??
Shit, this SL is getting EXPENSIVE!
Ok, so now we know all about graphics cards, and what is the best out there. We should now start a thread on the best motherboard/CPU.
a) So guys, what motherboard/CPU should I buy?
and,
b) should I change to Vista in order to take advantage of the extra memory it can address?
Rock
|
|
Sara Steinbeck
Registered User
Join date: 25 Oct 2005
Posts: 45
|
Help!
11-11-2007 06:10
While speaking of "graphics cards" (interesting topic), I am getting some good input as to what to include in my new computer when I purchase it. That said, I am not knowledgeable enough to made a good decision on the guts of a new computer. I do graphic arts, play highly graphical games and like running more than one program at a time. I want enough power and space to accomplish multitasking without constant drag and freezing up. I'd like to be able to run SL while also doing, let's say some Microsoft Office projects. I'd like to include the new Vista and I am currently using a cable Internet connection.
Can someone help me decide on the "processor", ram, graphics card, etc. that I should consider when having my computer built. While I am not into spending $5k for it, I am willing to go as far as perhaps $3k....which should buy me a somewhat decent computer I'd say.
Thanks for your help!
|
|
Katier Reitveld
M2 News Manager
Join date: 13 Sep 2005
Posts: 412
|
11-11-2007 07:53
Sadly whoever told you a P4 was an ultimate gaming CPU was taking you for a ride.
the P4 is ancient for starters and never was a good gaming CPU. 2 years ago, when I bought my PC, AMD was the best ( and absolutely slaughtered the P4 ) until Intel brought out the Core Duo.
Since then AMD have not, as yet, managed to catch back up although their CPU's are still very capable and AMD try to be better at the lower price brackets by selling their CPU's cheaper (not sure they're totally successfull at it but the point is AMD's aren't bad, they're just not as good as core duo).
According to Toms Hardware CPU guide a 3800 P4 loses out to my X2 3800+ (which as I say is 2 years old) on graphical applications.
|
|
Katier Reitveld
M2 News Manager
Join date: 13 Sep 2005
Posts: 412
|
11-11-2007 08:02
From: Sara Steinbeck While speaking of "graphics cards" (interesting topic), I am getting some good input as to what to include in my new computer when I purchase it. That said, I am not knowledgeable enough to made a good decision on the guts of a new computer. I do graphic arts, play highly graphical games and like running more than one program at a time. I want enough power and space to accomplish multitasking without constant drag and freezing up. I'd like to be able to run SL while also doing, let's say some Microsoft Office projects. I'd like to include the new Vista and I am currently using a cable Internet connection.
Can someone help me decide on the "processor", ram, graphics card, etc. that I should consider when having my computer built. While I am not into spending $5k for it, I am willing to go as far as perhaps $3k....which should buy me a somewhat decent computer I'd say.
Thanks for your help! The key words are :- 4 gig RAM Intel Core Duo CPU and with your budget probably a Nvidia 8800 Graphics card. Oh and a 5-6ms Response Timeon on the flat panel (minimum 19"  LCD monitor. I'd also reccomend a quality case to keep things cool, I'm a fan of Lian-li cases. Excellent cooling and VERY lightweight. The rest is pretty incedental.
|
|
Jesse Barnett
500,000 scoville units
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 4,160
|
11-11-2007 08:14
From: Katier Reitveld The key words are :- 4 gig RAM Intel Core Duo CPU and with your budget probably a Nvidia 8800 Graphics card. Oh and a 5-6ms Response Timeon on the flat panel (minimum 19"  LCD monitor. I'd also reccomend a quality case to keep things cool, I'm a fan of Lian-li cases. Excellent cooling and VERY lightweight. The rest is pretty incedental. Ah heck. You can buy a 20" for about $200 and a 22" for about $240 now. If you want to splurge then 24" for about $450.
_____________________
I (who is a she not a he) reserve the right to exercise selective comprehension of the OP's question at anytime. From: someone I am still around, just no longer here. See you across the aisle. Hope LL burns in hell for archiving this forum
|
|
Sara Steinbeck
Registered User
Join date: 25 Oct 2005
Posts: 45
|
11-11-2007 16:21
From: Katier Reitveld The key words are :- 4 gig RAM Intel Core Duo CPU and with your budget probably a Nvidia 8800 Graphics card. Oh and a 5-6ms Response Timeon on the flat panel (minimum 19"  LCD monitor. I'd also reccomend a quality case to keep things cool, I'm a fan of Lian-li cases. Excellent cooling and VERY lightweight. The rest is pretty incedental. Thanks Katier....probably going to go with a 20 or 22" monitor...otherwise definitely good info I will keep in mind.
|