3
4
6
Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Poll: Freedom of Speech |
|
|
Wheezie Jefferson
is movin' on up
Join date: 9 Jan 2008
Posts: 33
|
01-19-2008 02:30
I chose options
3 4 6 |
|
Beezle Warburton
=o.O=
Join date: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 1,169
|
01-19-2008 02:32
I chose options 3 4 6 I found the lack of a "pie" option annoying, abusive, threatening, or harassing.  |
|
Isablan Neva
Mystic
Join date: 27 Nov 2004
Posts: 2,907
|
01-19-2008 08:05
What I'd be curious about is whether the OP feels the poll questions only apply to other people, or whether she takes them to heart as well. It has been my observation that those prone to excessive levels of drahma generally remain blissfully unaware of their own role in instigating and/or feeding said drahma.  _____________________
 http://slurl.com/secondlife/TheBotanicalGardens/207/30/420/ |
|
Marianne McCann
Feted Inner Child
Join date: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 7,145
|
01-19-2008 08:46
"Freedom of speech" does not apply in the context of private forums.
Mari _____________________
 "There's nothing objectionable nor illegal in having a child-like avatar in itself and we must assume innocence until proof of the contrary." - Lewis PR Linden "If you find children offensive, you're gonna have trouble in this world " - Prospero Linden |
|
Snowman Jiminy
Registered User
Join date: 23 Dec 2007
Posts: 424
|
01-19-2008 09:34
Well I only added that because that is what it said in the article regarding the new law: http://www.news.com/Create-an-e-annoyance,-go-to-jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html?tag=sas.email I think some might think that I am bringing this poll/subject because I am trying to start a debate which is probably inevitable anyhow. As I said, I was browsing the threads I linked on the initial post there (looks up) and wondered what others thought in regards to it. Perhaps I should have linked that article as well. lol 1984 has arrived nearly thirty years late. _____________________
|