Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

A certain something left the grid this week - Good or bad?

AfroduckFromPC Brim
Registered User
Join date: 18 Apr 2008
Posts: 133
07-20-2008 23:19
From: Aminom Marvin
Your speculation is completely wrong. LL is just doing the legally and morally correct thing to do by banning activities of sexual ageplay, which is just a "polite" way of saying child porn. The RL definition of ageplay (one _adult_ behaving like a child) is completely different than in SL, where simulated children engage in sexual acts. This isn't the psychologically wholesome "self-exploration" activity that SL pedophiles claim, but a feeding of some of the darkest desires of humanity. I hope the people who do such things are arrested and brought to justice. Such people have no place in civil society.

How about the Gorean stuff? Slavery is slavery and they're putting a lot of effort into simulating it here on SL. This *is* supposed to be a civil society after all.

Oh, and the furries, especially the yiffy ones. Anthropomorphic or no, it's basically animal sex. And with the bestiality folks it's an even more straightforward case.

Almost forgot the gang and mafia RPers. Pretty sure I've even seen a few Nazis running around.

Also, the escorts and prostitutes cause I know that ain't legal in the US which is where LLs servers are. Better be sure to purge them too.
Lear Cale
wordy bugger
Join date: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 3,569
07-21-2008 06:27
From: Aminom Marvin
Your speculation is completely wrong. LL is just doing the legally and morally correct thing to do by banning activities of sexual ageplay, which is just a "polite" way of saying child porn. The RL definition of ageplay (one _adult_ behaving like a child) is completely different than in SL, where simulated children engage in sexual acts. This isn't the psychologically wholesome "self-exploration" activity that SL pedophiles claim, but a feeding of some of the darkest desires of humanity. I hope the people who do such things are arrested and brought to justice. Such people have no place in civil society.


What speculation?

Legally, yes: LL is covering their legal risks, which is what any sensible company does.

Morally? I disagree. As long as no real children are involved, there's no moral issue here. Of course, that's debatable, just as are homosexuality, adultery, depicting human faces (banned by a religion that has a billion followers), showing of any flesh other than hands and faces, and killing ones female family member as a matter of honor (permitted by an interpretation of a major religion).

My point is simply that moral issues are debatable, and LL is not taking a moral stand here. You're free to have your opinions, as am I. In democracies, laws are not based on morals alone, but on agreements between people concerning shared morals. In the case of LL, the laws of a small number of countries caused the action. For example, in Germany, animated child pornography is illegal; and it was argued that SL SAP falls under that category. There are no such laws in many other countries, including the US, but LL has to protect itself on a number of fronts. As I said above, I'm glad they choose not to honor the laws of Iran. :)
Imnotgoing Sideways
Can't outlaw cute! =^-^=
Join date: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 4,694
07-21-2008 07:18
We all well know that almost every sense of lifestyle has it's own form reprehensibility and it's a bit redundant to bring up furries, Gor, and escorts.

I mean... Someone can find organized religion just as much of a social evil, depending on their state of mind. Doing so has lead to a long string of threadlocks before, and in a way, doesn't address the intent of my OP.

The exodus has happend... Here's the scenario I fear....

This unregulated grid will be populated with the SAP community, each with their own values on what they determine appropriate. Some fully dedicated to cartoon sex (not unlike myself, I won't deny or defend) and some who are after something more (the part I'm worried about). Since this new grid is unregulated, everyone is unverified by default.

Eventually a RL kid will get involved, and probably get caught or talk about it and draw attention. The vultures will dive in and publicity will ensue. The press, being the marketing geniuses they are, will not refer to the events as occurring on some new independent grid that never existed before.

At best, it will be described as a "Second Life like environment" or anything of the sort. No doubt... The SL name will be injected in the story somehow. Considering this grid can be accessed using the SL client and some command line edits, the ability to differentiate it is nearly impossible for the avatar-uninitiated.

So, instead of SL being part of a public outcry over cartoon/CG depictions, things may be dragged in the mud over a RL situation that in no doubt will end poorly. So, taking moral decisions in order, I'm sure that a CG job is the lesser of two evils.

As it stands, LL has their rules set... I'm following them... I wouldn't have lasted this long otherwise, considering I deal with the G-Team quite often. But, I think the SAP policy as it stands is turning into a fatal error. I'm not saying wipe it from the books (or blog (that nobody sees anymore anyway) ). We'll just have to see how things turn out, I guess.

(My brain is melting from using so many big words. (T_T) )

/me steps back in to character and physbombs a sandbox to blow off some steam. (=_=)y
_____________________
Somewhere in this world; there is someone having some good clean fun doing the one thing you hate the most. (^_^)y


http://slurl.com/secondlife/Ferguson/54/237/94
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
07-21-2008 07:48
The only fatal error as far as SL is concerned is to "keep it here so it doesn't proliferate anywhere else."

That's just insane. You cannot stop it, it is just human nature that it would happen. Yes, I am worried about rl kids but it would be up to people with a conscience to out these new grid hideaways. That doesn't mean that it should remain here and continue to expose LL to legal liability, which could eventually destroy the whole place.
_____________________
Affordable & beautiful apartments & homes starting at 150L/wk! Waterfront homes, 575L/wk & 300 prims!

House of Cristalle low prim prefabs: secondlife://Cristalle/111/60

http://cristalleproperties.info
http://careeningcristalle.blogspot.com - Careening, A SL Sailing Blog
Marianne McCann
Feted Inner Child
Join date: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 7,145
07-21-2008 07:53
From: Imnotgoing Sideways
Eventually a RL kid will get involved, and probably get caught or talk about it and draw attention. The vultures will dive in and publicity will ensue. The press, being the marketing geniuses they are, will not refer to the events as occurring on some new independent grid that never existed before.

At best, it will be described as a "Second Life like environment" or anything of the sort. No doubt... The SL name will be injected in the story somehow. Considering this grid can be accessed using the SL client and some command line edits, the ability to differentiate it is nearly impossible for the avatar-uninitiated.


Spot on. Given Sky News called a group of non-sexual-ageplaying kids "deviants" and implied they were pedophiles in their last SL story, facts won't get in their way.
_____________________


"There's nothing objectionable nor illegal in having a child-like avatar in itself and we must assume innocence until proof of the contrary." - Lewis PR Linden
"If you find children offensive, you're gonna have trouble in this world :)" - Prospero Linden
Cael Merryman
Brain in Neutral
Join date: 5 Dec 2007
Posts: 380
A Net Plus
07-21-2008 08:23
From: Conifer Dada
...
But what happens if an independent grid is based in a country which has no laws against online virtual ageplay and is used mainly by citizens of that country? Presumably the internet service provider might feel obliged to act.

...


Not one for NIMBY, but in this case its for the best. In SL, the contacts would be in-world and large subterranean in nature. To get a crowd to move to an off-world region, they will have to raise their heads above the water to advertise. If it is just the same old crowd, perhaps no damage, but their growth will be slow, if any. And stepping across the line will be more public and more dangerous if they are violating any laws. If it is just adults, probably not (at least in the USA by recent court decisions, and we do tend to be the more Puritanical than most Western countries).
Lolita Pro
www.PhotosByLolita.com
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 273
07-21-2008 11:48
/me points to her name ...

You can imagine the questions I get asked. My choice of names was probably not the best, and of course I can't change it, and I have too much invested in myself to start over. So I deal.

I am not a child avatar. I am a grown woman, 5' 4", petite.

Regarding the camp in question ... I enjoyed hanging out there. I have several friends who choose to play as younger avatars. Some may indeed be looking for SAP, but they haven't told me about it, and I haven't asked. The majority, however, appear to simply prefer to play as younger avatars. I do tend to stick with the friends who speak plain english, and not the 3-year-old nonsense. (you know, "Pwease pway with me. I dink dat's a pwetty dwess.";) Talk/type like that, and I ignore you.

Regarding SAP, I equate it to fantasy RL roleplay. Mr. Manly comes home from work and has his wife dress up in a catholic schoolgirl outfit or a high school cheerleader outfit, and they "play" ... or what about the adult baby fetish? You know, the one where the guy wears a diaper and plays like a baby for "mommy" to take care of?

It happens in RL, and since all are adults, and it takes place behind closed doors, nobody complains. I'm a very strong conservative, living in the deep south of the bible belt, and I think that SL shouldn't be any different. If adult ageplayers want to do SAP, knock yourselves out. Go to a private skybox and keep it behind closed doors. But, SL and the mass population doesn't see it that way. No worries, however, as it doesn't affect me either way.

So, the kids will find a new place to hang out. Will SAP be there? Who knows ... I won't ask, and people won't tell.

So now lets talk about the rampant drug use in SL. I see weed, cocaine, meth, and a variety of other illegal drugs being (virtually) sold in SL. Shouldn't that be illegal?
Har Fairweather
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 2,320
07-21-2008 12:15
I think proposing bans should be illegal.
Marianne McCann
Feted Inner Child
Join date: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 7,145
07-21-2008 12:23
From: Lolita Pro
So now lets talk about the rampant drug use in SL. I see weed, cocaine, meth, and a variety of other illegal drugs being (virtually) sold in SL. Shouldn't that be illegal?


I've only see the first of those, usually in green text. I cough whenever people smoke around my avvie, no matter what they happen to be smoking,. I'm bad dat way.

Mari
(Who used to shop at a store not far from your studio, and saw your name on my Mysti a few times)
_____________________


"There's nothing objectionable nor illegal in having a child-like avatar in itself and we must assume innocence until proof of the contrary." - Lewis PR Linden
"If you find children offensive, you're gonna have trouble in this world :)" - Prospero Linden
TundraFire Nightfire
Permafrostbilly
Join date: 5 Apr 2008
Posts: 532
07-21-2008 12:25
From: Zaphod Kotobide
Har, I completely agree with everything you just said. (we should have a drink to celebrate that) but I think in this case it is important enough to point out, and remind other participants in this and other threads, that "ageplay" is not a term that we should be using in this context. It needs an entire phrase.. "sexual age play".

We all know what you mean, but there are folks who play children with no bad intent, and that minor omission of distinction can too easily cast them on the same stage.


I'm with you on making the distinction. These are two different things.
Tabliopa Underwood
Registered User
Join date: 6 Aug 2007
Posts: 719
07-21-2008 22:09
Child avatars I have no problem with. Some of my best friends are children =) Mostly because they don't start conversations with "hey babe u wanna ..."

Its not a question of if, otherwise. Depicting sexual acts involving the pictorial representation of children is illegal in many jurisdictions where SL is available, mine included. The carriers of such imagery are also acting criminally according to those laws. No responsible company will knowingly and wilfully break them. Allowing this kind of criminal activity in SL is not an option for LL, at least in my country anyway, thank goodness.

As for dope-smoking furrialities who collar their cousins instead of marrying them and then suck all their virtual blood out turning them into mindless playthings then well !!! golly gosh !!! How anyone can equate this with the former then umm! yeah right!
Nina Stepford
was lied to by LL
Join date: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 3,373
07-21-2008 23:26
personally, i couldnt care less what avi two adults choose to wear while engaging in cyber.
want to play teacher/student? knock yourself out.
want to play mommy and son? its not a concern to me, and i dont understand why everyone else gets so worked up about it.
Snickers Snook
Odd Princess - Trout 7.3
Join date: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 746
07-22-2008 01:06
From: Kyllie Wylie
Ahhh..sort of like when I found out that 7' Blond Hunky Avatar "Robert84" was really a 84 year old playing from a nursing home .... that made introducing him to the parents difficult......


So what happened when you met his parents?
_____________________

Buh-bye forums, it's been good ta know ya.
Tegg Bode
FrootLoop Roo Overlord
Join date: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 5,707
07-22-2008 01:14
From: Har Fairweather
I think proposing bans should be illegal.

Yep all those dumb bans like banning the taking of explosives and guns on planes, kids banned from buying alocohol, etc got to go.
Restrictions can go too, down with speed limits, red lights and food industry regulations.
_____________________
Level 38 Builder [Roo Clan]

Free Waterside & Roadside Vehicle Rez Platform, Desire (88, 17, 107)

Avatars & Roadside Seaview shops and vendorspace for rent, $2.00/prim/week, Desire (175,48,107)
Nina Stepford
was lied to by LL
Join date: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 3,373
07-22-2008 06:28
in the context of this discussion, SECONDLIFE, sure. why not?
From: Tegg Bode
Yep all those dumb bans like banning the taking of explosives and guns on planes, kids banned from buying alocohol, etc got to go.
Restrictions can go too, down with speed limits, red lights and food industry regulations.
Darien Caldwell
Registered User
Join date: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 3,127
07-22-2008 12:13
From: Imnotgoing Sideways
Actually... With the current events, virtual worlds in general are at a greater legal risk because SAP has now been relatively relocated to an non-corporate grid with no known legal monitoring or age restriction.

What was once adults on adults in an adult grid living a pixelated fantasy now has the increased risk of involving RL children. Outside our own little avatar culture, virtual worlds are painted with a broad brush.

As a return question... Do you think the feds will be paying LESS attention now?


Well the point is, they won't be shutting SL down for crimes committed on some other grid. Not the same company, completely unrelated.
_____________________
Kyrah Abattoir
cruelty delight
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 2,786
07-22-2008 14:48
my opinion on this subject.

http://kdc.ethernia.net/?p=238
_____________________

tired of XStreetSL? try those!
apez http://tinyurl.com/yfm9d5b
metalife http://tinyurl.com/yzm3yvw
metaverse exchange http://tinyurl.com/yzh7j4a
slapt http://tinyurl.com/yfqah9u
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
07-22-2008 14:51
From: Tegg Bode
Yep all those dumb bans like banning the taking of explosives and guns on planes, kids banned from buying alocohol, etc got to go.
Restrictions can go too, down with speed limits, red lights and food industry regulations.

None of which apply to SL......
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
07-22-2008 19:10
From: Brenda Connolly
None of which apply to SL......


They would if I owned a sim.
_____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
3Ring Binder
always smile
Join date: 8 Mar 2007
Posts: 15,028
07-22-2008 19:11
From: Bradley Bracken
They would if I owned a sim.

see? this is why i've missed you so much! :D
_____________________
it was fun while it lasted.
http://2lf.informe.com/
1 2 3 4 5