Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Should LL Implement a Sales Tax?

Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
01-13-2005 16:20
Put a tax on making forum polls!

It would kill 2 birds with one stone!
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
Antagonistic Protagonist
Zeta
Join date: 29 Jun 2003
Posts: 467
01-13-2005 16:32
Read my lips: "No new taxes"

*giggle*
Eggy Lippmann
Wiktator
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 7,939
01-13-2005 16:34
Sounds like you should have visited the OLD SL, where we had to pay for everything, were always broke, couldnt buy money online, or do any sort of large project.
Hank Ramos
Lifetime Scripter
Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 2,328
01-13-2005 16:53
So, I guess this tax is on everyone to help support money ball and bingo games? Why should everyone pay to support events in SL? I don't want to have to subsidize events run by other people.

Now taxes on light prims, that I would agree on! :D
Persephone Phoenix
loving laptopvideo2go.com
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,012
I would be willing to pay one if it supplemented Community
01-13-2005 17:02
I would be willing to pay as much as 10% sales tax if that would subsidize funding for arts and cultural events.
Nicholas Portocarrero
Registered User
Join date: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 237
01-13-2005 17:05
No way, a sales/transfer tax is the worst idea I have heard so far.
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
01-13-2005 17:05
From: Persephone Phoenix
I would be willing to pay as much as 10% sales tax if that would subsidize funding for arts and cultural events.
Me too! I have way too much money in SL. More than I could ever spend. Why not put some of it to productive use?

~Ulrika~
_____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
Cross Lament
Loose-brained Vixen
Join date: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 1,115
01-13-2005 17:07
Oh, for gods sake. I didn't come here to play "Second Economy" or "Second Career". Jeez, people. :p

Unequivocably, NO. What the hell is the point? Nobody can use these 'taxes' for anything, and it's exactly equivalent to lowering the amount people get paid in stipend.

What the heck are Linden Dollars, anyway? When I first arrived here, they appeared to be an implementation of system resource allocation control. They've mutated into some sort of Real Cash (tm), it seems. Ugh.
_____________________
- Making everyone's day just a little more surreal -

Teeple Linden: "OK, where did the tentacled thing go while I was playing with my face?"
Nicholas Portocarrero
Registered User
Join date: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 237
01-13-2005 17:08
From: Jacqueline Richelieu
Thats exactly what it would be intended for... a sink. To offset the massive influx of new money coming into SL each week via stipends and bonuses.


How about we just remove the stipends/bonuses entirely? :eek:


Hey, it makes a hell of a lot more more sense than a sales tax!
Antagonistic Protagonist
Zeta
Join date: 29 Jun 2003
Posts: 467
01-13-2005 17:09
From: someone
More than I could ever spend. Why not put some of it to productive use?


An excellent idea!! I look forward to hearing your upcoming announcement about an endowment for the arts you are funding with your money! And think, since *you* will be funding it, *you* get to decide what arts to sponsor!

-AP
Nicholas Portocarrero
Registered User
Join date: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 237
01-13-2005 17:20
From: Ulrika Zugzwang
Me too! I have way too much money in SL. More than I could ever spend. Why not put some of it to productive use?

~Ulrika~



Uh... then maybe you should try spending YOUR money to support what YOU believe is a productive use. Incredible idea huh?
Amy Faddoul
Carrion Eater
Join date: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 129
01-13-2005 17:22
From: Antagonistic Protagonist
An excellent idea!! I look forward to hearing your upcoming announcement about an endowment for the arts you are funding with your money! And think, since *you* will be funding it, *you* get to decide what arts to sponsor!

-AP



Upskirt Museums? Glory of the torus? Torleys 100 page essay on the effects of packet loss on the esthetic rendering of Bump mapped fingernails complete with snapshots of upskirts??? Woot!
Michi Lumin
Sharp and Pointy
Join date: 14 Oct 2003
Posts: 1,793
01-13-2005 17:24
Though I could see the neccessity of a sales tax far into the future, I don't think that the system is mature enough to support one now.

If, to control inflation, and provide for universal accessibility in SL, and to support the overall longevity of SL, I had to pay, for example, 5% sales tax on all sales somewhere down the road, I would not be against it.

However, this would not be effective in the current situation as all sellers would simply raise their prices by the amount of the tax. The net effect would be a wash.

The first, and near term problem I have with a tax on -transfers- is that I use obect transfers, between myself and my alt, as BACKUP. We currently have no way to perform backup; transferring a copy of my avatar projects to my alternate account is the ONLY form of safeguarding I can take at this point to protect what I make from system crashes -- and as we know, inventory losses do happen.

I don't see why such a transaction should be taxed. Furthermore, would it be done per prim, or per object? It would have to be based on overall valuation, and sometimes multi-part sets are sold at one package valuation. (i.e., all the parts for our avatars at L$900.)

I'm not sure how a tax would be performed on this. The system would have to be able to distinguish between a sale and an unrelated payment. It would have to be able to identify a taxable transaction and distinguish it from a non-taxable one.

So I don't think the architecture is mature enough to support something like this; and as I said, all it would do is cause sellers to pad their prices.

I believe the proposer of this thread was looking for a way to "hit the content producers in the pocketbook", since the clubbers/socialites were "hit in the pocketbook" by this last change. It wouldn't do so. It'd be passed on to the purchasers. You couldn't even TOS your way out of that one; people get to set their own prices of their goods.

The wealth redistribution aspect of this likely won't work either. One would have to wonder about the results of 'alt banking', and other ways to avoid the tax system. It will, of course, happen if this is implemented.

Perhaps it's something that may be neccessary for the economy 5 years down the road. But I don't think that's what the point of this post was. I believe it was to 'get back' at the 'filthy rich content barons' - a sort of new logic I don't understand. It's not the content producers that were getting free money from LL.
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
01-13-2005 17:29
From: Antagonistic Protagonist
An excellent idea!! I look forward to hearing your upcoming announcement about an endowment for the arts you are funding with your money! And think, since *you* will be funding it, *you* get to decide what arts to sponsor!
While I am currently involved in just such an endeavor, unfortunately (or maybe fortunately), one person does not make an economy. If my income were so high that the redistribution of it alone could fund productive work in SL, I'd do it. However it does not, hence the question on taxes.

~Ulrika~
_____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
Antagonistic Protagonist
Zeta
Join date: 29 Jun 2003
Posts: 467
01-13-2005 17:34
From: someone
If my income were so high that the redistribution of it alone could fund productive work in SL, I'd do it. However it does not, hence the question on taxes.


With all due respect, it is extremely arrogant of you to imply you are the only person in SL with money who is willing to privately fund such endeavors. There are enough out there who do and will indeed fund productive work in SL ... WITHOUT the need for taxes or other silliness.

-AP
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
01-13-2005 17:36
From: Antagonistic Protagonist
With all due respect, it is extremely arrogant of you to imply you are the only person in SL with money who is willing to privately fund such endeavors. There are enough out there who do and will indeed fund productive work in SL ... WITHOUT the need for taxes or other silliness.
Antagonist thinks I'm arrogant. Oh, the drama! *swoon* :rolleyes:

~Ulrika~
_____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
01-13-2005 18:03
I still have my tea-crate, don't make me use it again! :D
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Hiro Pendragon
bye bye f0rums!
Join date: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,905
01-13-2005 22:42
Nope, sorry.

It'd be impossible to enforce a sales tax.

1. I can script my way around it.
2. On large purchases people would just deal with Ebay.
3. NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!
4. Taxation just to reduce money in the economy has got to be the most irresponsible use of taxes ever. Taxes are designed as a way for elected government to provide services for citizens, NOT for simply taking money away.
_____________________
Hiro Pendragon
------------------
http://www.involve3d.com - Involve - Metaverse / Emerging Media Studio

Visit my SL blog: http://secondtense.blogspot.com
Alby Yellowknife
Sic Semper Tyrannis
Join date: 5 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,148
01-13-2005 22:45
From: Hiro Pendragon
Nope, sorry.

It'd be impossible to enforce a sales tax.

1. I can script my way around it.
2. On large purchases people would just deal with Ebay.
3. NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!
4. Taxation just to reduce money in the economy has got to be the most irresponsible use of taxes ever. Taxes are designed as a way for elected government to provide services for citizens, NOT for simply taking money away.




Not really.. LL could just tax a percentage of however much you "Pay" to somebody or some thing. If you Pay JohnDoe L$100, then 5% would force an Auto-Deduction of L$105.

If all you have is L$100 in your account, then your account will end up -L$5. As soon as money is put back into your account, the 1st dollars go to bring your account back to L$0, then whatever is left over goes into your account.

Nothing is impossible, except having the will to make it possible.
Paolo Portocarrero
Puritanical Hedonist
Join date: 28 Apr 2004
Posts: 2,393
01-13-2005 22:48
From: Alby Yellowknife
Not really.. LL could just tax a percentage of however much you "Pay" to somebody or some thing. If you Pay JohnDoe L$100, then 5% would force an Auto-Deduction of L$105.

If all you have is L$100 in your account, then you account will end up -L$5. As soon as money is put back into your account, the 1st dollars go to bring your account back to L$0, then whatever is left over goes into your account.

Nothing is impossible, except having the will to make it possible.


Of all the people to advocate in-world taxation...
_____________________
Facades by Paolo - Photo-Realistic Skins for Doods
> Flagship store, Santo Paolo's Lofts & Boutiques
> SLBoutique
Hiro Pendragon
bye bye f0rums!
Join date: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,905
01-13-2005 22:54
From: Alby Yellowknife
Not really.. LL could just tax a percentage of however much you "Pay" to somebody or some thing. If you Pay JohnDoe L$100, then 5% would force an Auto-Deduction of L$105.

If all you have is L$100 in your account, then your account will end up -L$5. As soon as money is put back into your account, the 1st dollars go to bring your account back to L$0, then whatever is left over goes into your account.

Nothing is impossible, except having the will to make it possible.

Well, I shoulda known someone would suggest hard-coding "pay".

1. This is impractical since us scripters need to test out everything we make. I'd hate to have us taxed on payments to ourselves. Now, this could be waived for payment to self, I suppose, but often times other people will test my scripts, so it's still a problem.
2. As I stated, people could just use paypal to get around it.
3. People would barter more.
4. If this was implemented, someone would start a business that issued gold certificates, equivalent to L$. These certificates could be no-copy, no-mod, and authenticity kept by looking at the object's creator. These certificates could then be exchanged in liu of Linden Dollars.

Like I said, completely unenforcable.

Bad idea.
_____________________
Hiro Pendragon
------------------
http://www.involve3d.com - Involve - Metaverse / Emerging Media Studio

Visit my SL blog: http://secondtense.blogspot.com
Nicholas Portocarrero
Registered User
Join date: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 237
01-13-2005 23:12
From: Ulrika Zugzwang
Antagonist thinks I'm arrogant. Oh, the drama! *swoon* :rolleyes:

~Ulrika~



You are, but not because of what he said. To say people should be forced to pay something in order to support your pet causes, because you know better than customers what is and isn't good, is arrogant behaviour in my book. Mild inflation is less damaging to society than this tax idea. I don't mean to be rude, but a sales tax is a bad, bad, bad, bad, BAD idea. As in, BAD!
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
01-14-2005 09:05
From: Nicholas Portocarrero
sales tax is a bad, bad, bad, bad, BAD idea. As in, BAD!


Why?
Wall Street
Mr. Warm Fuzzy
Join date: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 312
01-14-2005 09:12
Yes and Yes

Modern day Robin Hood.

Steal from the rich to feed the poor.
_____________________
Save the World... Kill Yourself.

Long Live Good King Phillip I
Rest in Peace Grimmy Moonflower
Rest in Peace Shepp Proudfoot
Nicholas Portocarrero
Registered User
Join date: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 237
01-14-2005 21:43
Except Robin Hoob stole from the nobility, you know, those people just sat in their asses collecting taxes from the people, not the rich as in people who worked for their wealth. A sales tax won't help anyone, at all.
1 2 3