Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

10 States Pass Ban on Gay Marriage

Moleculor Satyr
Fireflies!
Join date: 5 Jan 2004
Posts: 2,650
11-03-2004 12:15
From: Grim Lupis
The very idea of marriage is religious in nature.

I'm having a hard time understanding why the anti-religious crowd is so pro-gay-marriage, instead of simply being opposed to all government control of and interference in marriage in general.

Anybody got a good answer for that one?


*raises hand*

I'm against the governmental interference in religious matters.

To me, marriage and civil unions should be seperate affairs. Marriage should have no legal standing whatsoever within the law of the nation, and civil unions should have no relgious significance whatsoever. You can get one, you can get the other, you can get both or neither, but "marriage" should not be both religious and governmental.
_____________________
</sarcasm>
Tikki Kerensky
Insane critter
Join date: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 687
11-03-2004 12:38
From: Grim Lupis

Juro, the concept of marriage is religious in origin. It's adoption by the government doesn't make it any less so. It simply makes it a matter of improper religious interference in government, or improper government interference in religion.


No it isn't. There's been more than a few societies that used it as a means of showing or acquiring power, political means or even just a show of love. I'm sure I can hunt down something to show this if I need to.
_____________________
Pudding takes away the pain, the pain of not having pudding.
Grim Lupis
Dark Wolf
Join date: 11 Jul 2003
Posts: 762
11-03-2004 12:49
From: Juro Kothari
So, you'd be willing to give up all of the protections/rights/responsibilites that come with a marriage certificate?


Such as what? The only thing you get out of government-sponsored marriage is the inability to go your separate ways without lengthy and expensive legal battles. If you really want that, hire a lawyer to draw up a partnership contract before you decide to move in with someone.

Really, the only benefit that I ever saw from a marriage certificate was dependency status of one of the spouses for tax purposes. But that doesn't really offset the marriage tax in most cases, so what's the big deal?
_____________________
Grim

"God only made a few perfect heads, the rest of them he put hair on." -- Unknown
Tikki Kerensky
Insane critter
Join date: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 687
11-03-2004 12:52
From: Grim Lupis
Really, the only benefit that I ever saw from a marriage certificate was dependency status of one of the spouses for tax purposes. But that doesn't really offset the marriage tax in most cases, so what's the big deal?


Insurance and other benefits. Estate rights in the event of death, etc, etc.
_____________________
Pudding takes away the pain, the pain of not having pudding.
Kiari LeFay
Lemon Flavored Fish Treat
Join date: 27 Jan 2003
Posts: 223
11-03-2004 14:41
How about the ability to sit beside your loved one during their last moments?

In intensive care only immediate family gets this privilege. A gay partner doesn't count and can be kept out.

Also, a gay partner listed in a will can be contested by the immediate family and disinherited, as can any children adopted by one partner and raised by both (as partners cannot adopt together).
Eggy Lippmann
Wiktator
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 7,939
11-03-2004 15:13
Doesnt anyone find the whole concept of marriage a little silly?
I mean, why the heck does the government care who or what I love?
Isn't it a bit anachronistic? It's like I have to register my ownership of a new piece of property. I dont think we should legalize gay marriage, I think we should do away with the whole god damn concept of marriage and divorce.
Ace Cassidy
Resident Bohemian
Join date: 5 Apr 2004
Posts: 1,228
11-03-2004 15:26
From: Hank Ramos
They banned interracial marrage before by popular vote and amendments to constitutions. Bigotry is not new in America.


*sigh*... ain't that the truth

- Ace
_____________________
"Free your mind, and your ass will follow" - George Clinton
doug Donovan
U WANNA PIECE 'O' ME?!
Join date: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 140
11-03-2004 18:03
1. if 2 guys wanna get married, how does this hurt me? im not thinkin about marryin a guy, but im not thinkin about eating vegimite either. and anybody that wants vegimite can get it easily. the real issue should be to ban vegimite! :D
Olympia Rebus
Muse of Chaos
Join date: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 1,831
11-03-2004 19:23
From: doug Donovan
1. if 2 guys wanna get married, how does this hurt me? im not thinkin about marryin a guy, but im not thinkin about eating vegimite either. and anybody that wants vegimite can get it easily. the real issue should be to ban vegimite! :D


I've heard about vegimite *shudder*
I propose a constitutional amendment that bans the stuff.
I'll call it the Defence of Condiments Amemendment.

ps. While I'm on a roll, I want to ban all the foods I consider gross:
frozen fish sticks, mutton, lutefisk, clams, escargot, oysters, raw swiss cheese, blood sausage, turkey dogs, tofu dogs, that purple sausage with the tongue chunks, okra, turnips, beets, daikon radish, wasabi, horseraddish, carrot juice, and any veggie juice the same color as lawn clippings. America must be protected from these devient substances masquarading as food!
_____________________
Neehai Zapata
Unofficial Parent
Join date: 8 Apr 2004
Posts: 1,970
11-03-2004 19:28
You should ban any food that claims to be "organic". What the hell does that mean anyway?

Isn't all food organic?

I know a lot of generally intelligent people that just ohhh and ahhh over a label that claims something is organic. I don't get and I'm not buying it.
_____________________
Unofficial moderator and proud dysfunctional parent to over 1000 bastard children.
Daemioth Sklar
Lifetime Member
Join date: 30 Jul 2003
Posts: 944
11-03-2004 19:46
Organic usually means that it isn't treated with genetic engineering or special hormones, and isn't sprayed with pesticides that are toxic
_____________________
:)
Grim Lupis
Dark Wolf
Join date: 11 Jul 2003
Posts: 762
11-03-2004 20:34
From: Tikki Kerensky
Insurance and other benefits. Estate rights in the event of death, etc, etc.


From: Kiari LeFay
How about the ability to sit beside your loved one during their last moments?

In intensive care only immediate family gets this privilege. A gay partner doesn't count and can be kept out.

Also, a gay partner listed in a will can be contested by the immediate family and disinherited, as can any children adopted by one partner and raised by both (as partners cannot adopt together).


All of these are valid issues. However, I think they're better addressed by addressing the problem, not shoe-horning every "pairing" of people into the definition of a "marriage."

I think the bigger problem is that much of our society is still stuck in the 40's/50's and a lot of these things are family-centric.

I'm not saying I have answers in my pocket, but there have to be reasonable compromises that don't center around marriage and the family tree. Tieing all of these issues to marriage just makes them all hot-button issues that conservatives and liberals will always fight over. If you find a way to remove morality/religion/marriage from the problem, compromises will be much easier to find.
_____________________
Grim

"God only made a few perfect heads, the rest of them he put hair on." -- Unknown
Juro Kothari
Like a dog on a bone
Join date: 4 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,418
11-03-2004 22:53
Using a paragraph from Grim's post above, I performed a little word-substitution to illustrate that for me, it's the same argument, just a new victim:


--------------------
I'm not saying I have answers in my pocket, but there have to be reasonable compromises that don't center around racial equality and segregation. Tieing all of these issues to racial equality just makes them all hot-button issues that blacks and whites will always fight over. If you find a way to remove racial equality/desegregation from the problem, compromises will be much easier to find.
---------------------


SEPARATE IS NEVER EQUAL.
Juro Kothari
Like a dog on a bone
Join date: 4 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,418
11-03-2004 22:56
From: Grim Lupis
If you find a way to remove morality/religion/marriage from the problem, compromises will be much easier to find.


Morality and Religious beliefs are the main reason people are opposed to gay marriage Grim.

There is no single valid reason I've heard over the last year to *not* allow same sex couples to marry. Not a single one, other than simple bigotry.
Hiro Pendragon
bye bye f0rums!
Join date: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,905
11-03-2004 23:24
I won't comment on my thoughts about gay marriage, but I will say that if you ban gay marriage, it definitely is a human rights violation to also ban civil unions. What is scary is that some of these states went so far as to ban those, too.

What's more scary is newly elected senators like DeMint. DeMint has said on the record that not only should gays not have civil unions, but they should also not be allowed to teach in schools. On top of that he added that neither should unwed mothers. Hello? Can we say trampling over reproductive rights? What fucking bullshit. Congrats, Southern US, on electing this closet-cased bigot. I'm ashamed this guy shares my political party.

I think it's absolutely sad and laughable that right-wingers claim gay marriage is a threat to the sanctity of marriage, not things like alcoholism, spouse abuse, child abuse, infidelity, high divorce rates, teenage and unwanted pregnancy ... etc etc etc.
_____________________
Hiro Pendragon
------------------
http://www.involve3d.com - Involve - Metaverse / Emerging Media Studio

Visit my SL blog: http://secondtense.blogspot.com
1 2