Second Life Forums Archive

Ania Soothsayer

Registered User

Join date: 4 Oct 2005

Posts: 1

07-28-2006 22:01

The eyesore of all furry avatar builders. A evil that we must endure if we want, say, digitgrade legs. Well, I propose we change this. A simple new feature that hides only the body of an avatar, or something of the sort. This way we wont have X-Ray footpaws. That is not a pretty sight, when you stand near someone with a complex avatar, and that person dissipears from sight, eaten by the foul demon known as the invisiprim.
EDIT: On the vote, I forgot to mention that it does NOT effect anything but that one avatar. Sorry.

------Vote on the proposal, Proposal 1707---------

Thanks, Ania Soothsayer
AKA
Kekken Biberman

Tere Karuna

Registered User

Join date: 4 Jul 2004

Posts: 159

07-28-2006 22:51

While I agree it would be a easy and nice feature (would really help with a project Im doing thats driving me up the wall atm

I think the hesitation is because the possibility of abuse. How do ya allow a person to invis themself yet keep them from saying walking into anothers private area unseen.

_____________________

"ooohhhh we didnt know what we had till it was gone;
they paved secondlife and put up a shoping mall,
oooooo, ba ba ba....."

Lightwave Valkyrie

Registered User

Join date: 30 Jan 2004

Posts: 666

07-29-2006 00:07

actually all we really need is to be able to make an alpha skin
-LW
ps i gave up on the voteing system when we got free accounts, just look thru them
and you will see its all useless now

Luke Mommsen

Registered User

Join date: 9 Oct 2005

Posts: 33

07-29-2006 08:54

All I can say is please use the search function before making new proposals.. we're wasting votes on different proposals that are the same thing.

Proposition 422 is asking for a feature with the same outcome, alpha channel support for skin textures. It is over 600 votes, and can't simply be ignored for much longer. So send your votes that way.

Proposition 422
http://secondlife.com/vote/vote.php?get_id=422

Lightwave Valkyrie

Registered User

Join date: 30 Jan 2004

Posts: 666

07-29-2006 10:49

heh i do have my votes all there

for almost a year now

unless you get an FIC
user to vote on it i dont think Lindens will even look at it LOL
sorry im so negitive but really browse through the items to vote on and
youll see its a joke now, just there to make ppl think some one cares...
-LW

Luke Mommsen

Registered User

Join date: 9 Oct 2005

Posts: 33

07-29-2006 19:52

I know what you mean.. There are proposals coming up all over the place, and then the ones that come up and suddenly have a couple hundred votes straight off because of alts. Then, as I said, all the repeating proposals, I mean, I can't tell you how many I've seen "increase the group limits!" there are so many of them it's not funny, and they're still coming out, even with the group system getting a complete revamp in the preview grid that's up at the moment.

Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

Invisiprims

Invisiprims
Ania Soothsayer Registered User Join date: 4 Oct 2005 Posts: 1	07-28-2006 22:01 The eyesore of all furry avatar builders. A evil that we must endure if we want, say, digitgrade legs. Well, I propose we change this. A simple new feature that hides only the body of an avatar, or something of the sort. This way we wont have X-Ray footpaws. That is not a pretty sight, when you stand near someone with a complex avatar, and that person dissipears from sight, eaten by the foul demon known as the invisiprim. EDIT: On the vote, I forgot to mention that it does NOT effect anything but that one avatar. Sorry. ------Vote on the proposal, Proposal 1707--------- Thanks, Ania Soothsayer AKA Kekken Biberman
Tere Karuna Registered User Join date: 4 Jul 2004 Posts: 159	07-28-2006 22:51 While I agree it would be a easy and nice feature (would really help with a project Im doing thats driving me up the wall atm I think the hesitation is because the possibility of abuse. How do ya allow a person to invis themself yet keep them from saying walking into anothers private area unseen. _____________________ "ooohhhh we didnt know what we had till it was gone; they paved secondlife and put up a shoping mall, oooooo, ba ba ba....."
Lightwave Valkyrie Registered User Join date: 30 Jan 2004 Posts: 666	07-29-2006 00:07 actually all we really need is to be able to make an alpha skin -LW ps i gave up on the voteing system when we got free accounts, just look thru them and you will see its all useless now
Luke Mommsen Registered User Join date: 9 Oct 2005 Posts: 33	07-29-2006 08:54 All I can say is please use the search function before making new proposals.. we're wasting votes on different proposals that are the same thing. Proposition 422 is asking for a feature with the same outcome, alpha channel support for skin textures. It is over 600 votes, and can't simply be ignored for much longer. So send your votes that way. Proposition 422 http://secondlife.com/vote/vote.php?get_id=422
Lightwave Valkyrie Registered User Join date: 30 Jan 2004 Posts: 666	07-29-2006 10:49 heh i do have my votes all there for almost a year now unless you get an FIC user to vote on it i dont think Lindens will even look at it LOL sorry im so negitive but really browse through the items to vote on and youll see its a joke now, just there to make ppl think some one cares... -LW
Luke Mommsen Registered User Join date: 9 Oct 2005 Posts: 33	07-29-2006 19:52 I know what you mean.. There are proposals coming up all over the place, and then the ones that come up and suddenly have a couple hundred votes straight off because of alts. Then, as I said, all the repeating proposals, I mean, I can't tell you how many I've seen "increase the group limits!" there are so many of them it's not funny, and they're still coming out, even with the group system getting a complete revamp in the preview grid that's up at the moment.