Anybody seen official word on how/if these calls will be updated for the new age verification stuff?
/me forsees clubs getting split into not-too-naughty areas on the ground with oh-so-naughty areas at altitude. Being able to (easily) script security devices that enforce the verified bit(s) would be nice..
Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
llGetParcelFlags/llRequestAgentData bits for age verified? |
|
|
Meade Paravane
Hedgehog
Join date: 21 Nov 2006
Posts: 4,845
|
08-29-2007 07:45
_____________________
Tired of shouting clubs and lucky chairs? Vote for llParcelSay!!!
- Go here: http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/SVC-1224 - If you see "if you were logged in.." on the left, click it and log in - Click the "Vote for it" link on the left |
|
Darien Caldwell
Registered User
Join date: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 3,127
|
08-29-2007 12:39
I don't think thats how LL intends it to work. You either flag the whole parcel restricted, or not. Altitude doesn't come into play. But I know what you mean. I'm sure people would like the ability to do that. :\
_____________________
|
|
Meade Paravane
Hedgehog
Join date: 21 Nov 2006
Posts: 4,845
|
08-29-2007 12:55
You're probably right but I think it's within the rules as long as the parcel owner makes an real effort to keep unverified accounts out of the naughty areas.
It seems like a simple script to write too, if they were to support these bits... _____________________
Tired of shouting clubs and lucky chairs? Vote for llParcelSay!!!
- Go here: http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/SVC-1224 - If you see "if you were logged in.." on the left, click it and log in - Click the "Vote for it" link on the left |
|
Squirrel Wood
Nuteater. Beware!
Join date: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 471
|
08-30-2007 01:42
I'm sure LL will add the capability to query that information. Wouldn#t make sense if they didn't do so.
|