Trying to pass some variables with HTTP REQUEST

Hiya, the resources in the wiki are scant in describing how to pass variables and paramaters in a HTTP_REQUEST..

Sorry to seem so dense... But read this....

• list parameters – HTTP request parameters in the format
[ parameter1, value1, parameter2, value2, . . . parameterN, valueN]


And thought it meant that you write something like this in the []..

["RMOTECHANNELRPC", (string) remotechannel]

---- remotchannel was a KEY and I am sending httprequest from within remote data channel call ------

But I got an error that "HTTP parameter key 1 is not an integer" ?????

Any good resources about this issue that anyone has or a sentence explaining how to do it would be appreciated.

BTW I am trying to use the http request to pass the rpc channel back to the database, for storage. If that makes sense then you prolly get my question.

The LSL-Wiki is usually more helpful - they provide a good example of how to use llHTTPRequest():

http://www.lslwiki.net/lslwiki/wakka.php?wakka=llHTTPRequest

Thanks Haruki, that did fill in the blanks.. Task completed!!

I've changed the description to make it harder to make that mistake. It now reads:
• list parameters – configuration parameters, HTTP_* flag & value pairs
[ parameter1, value1, parameter2, value2, . . . parameterN, valueN]

The article could really use an explanation of using the different HTTP_METHOD values and how to construct requests.

I read that as saying it's a list of either configuration parameters or flag and value pairs.

How about "configuration parameters, specified as flag, value pairs: [flag1, value1, ...., flagN, valueN]"?

(I'm not sure what the accepted protocol is for this sort of suggestion, but it seems rude to just go in and change the wiki immediately after someone else changed it.)

Flag, parameter, whatever. The confusing bit might be that it is the NAME of the thing in the first position. Maybe it would be better to state it as "[ parameter1Name1, parameter1Value, parameter2Name, parameter2Value, ... ]".

I'll make it so.

You are welcome to and I give you permission to edit anything I edit immediately after I edit it. I won't take any offense, all I ask is that you consider filling in the comment field. If something is bad it should be corrected, bad content should not see the light of day.

Personally I like it when there is someone editing my edits, it gives me something to think about, the different view point of the other author spurs me on to write better content. I'd rather my edits be edited immediately then hours or days later, while I'm still thinking about it.

For me the content comes first, the people come second. I welcome constructive criticism and I'm open to all sorts of ideas. If there is some big sweeping change you wish made (and you consult me) be prepared to implement it yourself or organize people to implement it for you; I'm not your bitch, I choose my own projects.