|
Zaplok Riggles
Registered User
Join date: 25 Feb 2008
Posts: 119
|
04-28-2008 07:37
Data Access Worldwide is pleased to announce that the Release Candidate of our Second Life Database Project is now available. This is an http driven interface to a perpetually hosted database using a powerful interface along with a web interface to deliver persistent out of game storage to second life developers.
The scripts and hosting will be 100% free of charge. During this stage, we are looking for experienced scripters to help us do one final test of the systems and let us know if there's anything that needs to be changed prior to release.
If you are a competent LSL scripter and are interested in adding persistent database storage to your scripts, along with accessing your data via a web interface, please email me to request an example object, script, and full project documentation. Again, there is no charge for this and we will promptly supply you with a Release Candidate kit.
Email [email=doug-g@dataaccess.com]doug-g@dataaccess.com[/email] to request a userid/password and to be sent an ingame object with sample script and full documentation.
Looking forward to working with the Second Life Developer community.
Zaplok Riggles
|
|
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
|
04-28-2008 11:42
I'm not sure, but shouldn't this be in the New Products forum?
|
|
Zaplok Riggles
Registered User
Join date: 25 Feb 2008
Posts: 119
|
04-28-2008 13:06
Well, it is something scripters would like to look at I'm sure, and we are looking for some active scripters to give it a final look before release.
|
|
Very Keynes
LSL is a Virus
Join date: 6 May 2006
Posts: 484
|
04-29-2008 12:50
Hi, and thanks I got my in world greeter object. Just my first comments, hopefully others will add, I find the amount of "plug in" code required to be quite large, a script could store a substantial amount of data in the overhead required to access your system, perhaps it should be provided as a separate script with a LinkMessage interface. Secondly I find a fixed number of fields of fixed type to be overly restrictive. I would have personally gone for a simple key = value pair, or a dynamically definable layout but based on the backend as a single Blob entry. I hope that came across as constructive, I do appreciate that you are providing a free service, but you requested feedback and that was my first impression 
|