New version, No post on blog?
|
|
Rhyph Somme
Registered User
Join date: 2 Dec 2005
Posts: 263
|
07-09-2007 17:41
Anyone else seen or tried this 1.17.3(1) yet?
|
|
Damet Neumann
Registered User
Join date: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 140
|
yep
07-09-2007 17:53
i upgraded then saw the blog that i didnt need to if s/l was running for me  |
|
Alicia Sautereau
if (!social) hide;
Join date: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 3,125
|
07-09-2007 17:53
From: Blog We’ve posted a very minor viewer update to Second Life 1.17.3 which addresses a viewer crash on startup for certain classes of older hardware. If you’ve been running with 1.17.3, there’s no need to update - there are no functional changes. i`d stay away as far as u can from 17.3... from the blog reply: Livinda Goodliffe Says: July 9th, 2007 at 5:49 PM PDT Okay…but, what I go to login, it fails and a dialog box says Optional Viewer 1.17.3 (1) and there is only one button…the Close button. 3 Tyler Says: July 9th, 2007 at 5:55 PM PDT yep, I cant login Dont get it lol fix the crashing, not being able to login? haha anyone else wants to say the jira is working or that we should look forward to 1.18.* ??? lmao |
|
Oryx Tempel
Registered User
Join date: 8 Nov 2006
Posts: 7,663
|
07-09-2007 18:16
Boy, somebody's got a case of the grumpies.
|
|
Alicia Sautereau
if (!social) hide;
Join date: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 3,125
|
07-09-2007 18:25
From: Oryx Tempel Boy, somebody's got a case of the grumpies. yes i have in my short life i`ve went form a usable client with some quirks to an unstable client with so many bugs u can start a farm with with the permissions crap on prims in prims(and scripts) i`ve seen the only thing i like go unusable, so basicly i`m paying for 3/5th island(i own) to be bored, been past my hopefull days, my doubting days and sarcastic days to just say where they stand, wich u can`t deny is the truth hell, they can`t even be botherd to fix the payment system so they get more money, says enough without mentioning the bugs, 2 months on and paypal payments are still fubar support sucks, it`s left for the people here to help eachother, so u tell us all where we stand when it comes to client "fixes" and if it shouldn`t be time we all get really grumpy with LL as even this crash fix they screwedup with a bugged version check popup box with just "close" dare to say i`m wrong heh |
|
Tomas Gandini
Just Me!
Join date: 27 Jun 2006
Posts: 384
|
07-09-2007 18:26
From: Alicia Sautereau i`d stay away as far as u can from 17.3...
...
I agree, Tried it. Froze 30 seconds after logging in. Went back to Nicholaz 17i. Doesn't bode well for Wednesday.
_____________________
 Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups
|
|
Usagi Musashi
UM ™®
Join date: 24 Oct 2004
Posts: 6,083
|
They should have fixed First Look.
07-09-2007 18:41
1.17.3 and before are fine.
But the first look client is a lost situation! Why dont they First Look ( which to me ) ran without problem. First Look needs the fixing.........
|
|
Aleister Montgomery
Minding the gap
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 846
|
07-09-2007 20:52
The only possible change from "working" is to "not working". Therefore, if the old viewer works for you, don't update it unless you're forced to do so. Stick with 1.17.0 as long as you can.
_____________________
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
|
|
Aleister Montgomery
Minding the gap
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 846
|
07-09-2007 20:55
From: Usagi Musashi 1.17.3 and before are fine.
But the first look client is a lost situation! Why dont they First Look ( which to me ) ran without problem. First Look needs the fixing......... If the First Look code was stable, it would already be live and not only part of the First Look viewer. It's kinda the purpose of a First Look client to be bug-ridden.
_____________________
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
|
|
Usagi Musashi
UM ™®
Join date: 24 Oct 2004
Posts: 6,083
|
07-10-2007 01:12
From: Aleister Montgomery If the First Look code was stable, it would already be live and not only part of the First Look viewer. It's kinda the purpose of a First Look client to be bug-ridden. Thats what understood when one beta test any viewer........But I bring this up because I have not seen such bad coding in a client for 3 months. I am shocked they are so far behind in the dev of the First Look Viewer.......... |
