My L$2 worth...
*IF* someone has used CopyBot in some way that has damaged you or your corporation, then they have violated copyright law, and it is your responsibility to pursue them using lawyers and the courts. Linden Lab is likely willing to assist you, but they are not a party because they have not suffered damages.
*IF* you can prove that someone has used CopyBot to violate the Linden Labs Terms of Service, then you can file an abuse report, or drive over to Philip Linden's house and knock on his door, or whatever. In this case, Linden labs can investigate, and eventually take some action. Be careful, they might determine that your object is really derived from some earlier idea, and yo are violating some elses copy rights.
*IF* I download CopyBot, and fool around with it to see how it works, and maybe make a copy of some object that belongs to you, you are probably not damaged in any way, so it is probably not a violation of copyright law. For a comparison, if a teacher makes a copy of an article he sees and hands it out to his class, this is so-called "fair use" and not a violation. If he hands it out again the next semester, this *is* a violation, because he had time to get permission. However, it is such a minor violation that no one would bother to pursue it.
*IF* you are in a talent show, and you sing a Beatles song, you are violating the copy rights of whoever owns that song (I think it is Michael Jackson, isn't it?) Again, so minor that nobody cares.
*IF* you cross the street against a red light, you are violating a law. Again, nobody cares.
So, my L$2 worth is that people who can demonstrate that CopyBot users are hurting them, or damaging their business or reputation, or even just really likely to do that, they should pursue this matter, and the rest of us should just butt out.
**FLAME PROOF SUIT ON**