Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Could this be classed as "Gambling"?

Prawnyloks Parker
"Prim Fiddler"
Join date: 6 Oct 2006
Posts: 420
07-31-2007 09:05
Hi all, I just recently started a promo for my store.

See... /113/52/200384/1.html

Prizes are vouchers that can only be spent in my stores and not actual L$.

Does anyone know if this could be classed as illegal under the new gambling ban?
_____________________
PP Designs - The Home of Low Prim Designs - low prim prefabs & furniture



http://slurl.com/secondlife/nuclear/236/240/21 (main store)
or http://slurl.com/secondlife/huntsman/162/112/115
Jillian Callahan
Rotary-winged Neko Girl
Join date: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 3,766
07-31-2007 09:09
Probably yes.

In FL a promotion giving random prizes requiring a purchace to etnter is illegal. Companies using this kind of promotion can be legal about it by offering an alternative, free method to enter the "contest" and make the purchase entry incidental.
Amity Slade
Registered User
Join date: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 2,183
07-31-2007 09:13
This is clearly not what was intended to be banned in the wagering policy.

However, it would technically be banned under the definition provided in that policy.

This is something that should be considered in revising the wagering policy to make it clearer and more effective.

As to Real Life laws, that's a matter to research. It is true that generally contests like this can't be tied to purchases ("get your entry form from the cereal, or send an SASE to ___";). But without bothering to actually look up one of those laws, I'd guess there would be exemptions to contests with total prizes below a certain monetary value.
Kidd Krasner
Registered User
Join date: 1 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,938
07-31-2007 09:43
From: Amity Slade
This is clearly not what was intended to be banned in the wagering policy.

If you accept the premise that the intent of the policy is to comply with the new internet gambling law, the UIGEA, then yes, this was intended to be banned.
From: someone

However, it would technically be banned under the definition provided in that policy.

This is something that should be considered in revising the wagering policy to make it clearer and more effective.
What do you suggest? What exactly is the difference between this and other forms that should distinguish thig?

From: someone

As to Real Life laws, that's a matter to research. It is true that generally contests like this can't be tied to purchases ("get your entry form from the cereal, or send an SASE to ___";). But without bothering to actually look up one of those laws, I'd guess there would be exemptions to contests with total prizes below a certain monetary value.

There may indeed be states with such exemptions. There may also be places where, as a matter of case law and practice, cases over such tiny amounts are rejected. (One guiding principle in law is that "the law does not concern itself with trifles. Don't, however, assume it applies everwhere or in ever case.)

Unfortunately, the way the UIGEA is written, it effectively requires that this be true in all the states, not just some. Furthermore, from the LL perspective, the issue is might be the total amount of wagering, not the size of the individual bets. So just because one example may be so small that the participants may not be in trouble, doesn't mean that LL wouldn't be in trouble.
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
07-31-2007 09:45
Unfortunately I'd say the "No purchase neccessary" issue is where you'd fall foul of the gambling laws. If you offered people a free entry by sending you a notecard or by purchasing an item, then this would probably be allowed.
Kidd Krasner
Registered User
Join date: 1 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,938
07-31-2007 09:45
From: Prawnyloks Parker
Hi all, I just recently started a promo for my store.

See... /113/52/200384/1.html

Prizes are vouchers that can only be spent in my stores and not actual L$.

Does anyone know if this could be classed as illegal under the new gambling ban?

Why not just offer one item for sale for $0L, which is an easy way for people to enter at no charge. Furthermore, limit entries to one per customer, which would be good business policy anyway. You don't want customers with less cash feeling like people with more money have a better chance of winning, because that alienates the small customer.
Prawnyloks Parker
"Prim Fiddler"
Join date: 6 Oct 2006
Posts: 420
08-01-2007 09:39
Thanks for all the advice.
I decided to cancel to promo for the time being, just to be on the safe side.
Looks like I'll have to come up with some other idea :(
Ah well, that's SL!
_____________________
PP Designs - The Home of Low Prim Designs - low prim prefabs & furniture



http://slurl.com/secondlife/nuclear/236/240/21 (main store)
or http://slurl.com/secondlife/huntsman/162/112/115
Destiny Niles
Registered User
Join date: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 949
08-01-2007 09:54
As a general rule. If you have to ask - it probally is.
Prawnyloks Parker
"Prim Fiddler"
Join date: 6 Oct 2006
Posts: 420
08-01-2007 10:46
From: Destiny Niles
As a general rule. If you have to ask - it probally is.


LOL. I guess i should've known really.
_____________________
PP Designs - The Home of Low Prim Designs - low prim prefabs & furniture



http://slurl.com/secondlife/nuclear/236/240/21 (main store)
or http://slurl.com/secondlife/huntsman/162/112/115
Learjeff Innis
musician & coder
Join date: 27 Nov 2006
Posts: 817
08-01-2007 11:57
With a L$0 item for sale included in the raffle, you'd be OK. If LL called you on it, you could defend yourself by saying that it is NOT gambling, it's a promotional deal just those that we see all the time in RL. And in fact, it would not be wagering, since L$0 is NOT a wager.

It's not wagering because entrants are not charged a fee. Entry is free. It's simply automatic with the purchase of any product. (If you don't provide a free way to enter, then it IS wagering.)

However, it is against the letter of the LL rule., which is very poorly written and should be revised. They should learn to say what they mean and mean what they say, but they haven't learned that lesson yet, evidently.
Prawnyloks Parker
"Prim Fiddler"
Join date: 6 Oct 2006
Posts: 420
08-01-2007 15:06
Well for now I've decided to play it safe and have cancelled this promo.
I am working on an idea though where all my customers could get free stuff.
Still need to work out all the details and it would mean some updating, so it may take a while to get it underway. In the long run LL may have done me and my customers a favour as my new promo idea should be better for all.
_____________________
PP Designs - The Home of Low Prim Designs - low prim prefabs & furniture



http://slurl.com/secondlife/nuclear/236/240/21 (main store)
or http://slurl.com/secondlife/huntsman/162/112/115
Prawnyloks Parker
"Prim Fiddler"
Join date: 6 Oct 2006
Posts: 420
New promo now on
08-05-2007 10:50
I finally got around to starting a new "legal" promo at my store...

/113/77/202133/1.html

Now all customers get something :)
_____________________
PP Designs - The Home of Low Prim Designs - low prim prefabs & furniture



http://slurl.com/secondlife/nuclear/236/240/21 (main store)
or http://slurl.com/secondlife/huntsman/162/112/115
Angelique LaFollette
Registered User
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,595
08-05-2007 10:58
From: Prawnyloks Parker
Thanks for all the advice.
I decided to cancel to promo for the time being, just to be on the safe side.
Looks like I'll have to come up with some other idea :(
Ah well, that's SL!

Easy enough, Give the vouchers out for free, and Draw a winner. If no Purcahse is necesary, and No money is given in exchange for the vouchers then it's all good. you are just giving away some free stuff. and Free will attract many people to your store.

Angel.