No Tran AND No Copy possible for object sale?
|
Dallas Prudhomme
Registered User
Join date: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 30
|
09-29-2006 12:44
Hello. I have tried to find this answer and have been unsuccessful. I would like to sell my art as No Copy AND No Transfer, and for the life of me I can't figure out how. When Copy is deslected for an object, TRANS / GIVE AWAY automatically activates and grays out. I wouldn't think this was possible if I hadn't found this Knowledge Base article from a Linden that says objects can be NO TRANS & NO COPY. http://secondlife.com/knowledgebase/article.php?id=173Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks for your time! -Dallas Prudhomme The Sanctualary Art Gallery, Datana
|
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
|
09-29-2006 13:13
I think that it's recently been made impossible to make something nocopy notrans. Someone correct me if I'm wrong here.
_____________________
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/forum/ - visit Ordinal's Scripting Colloquium for scripting discussion with actual working BBCode!
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/ - An Engine Fit For My Proceeding, my Aethernet Journal
http://www.flickr.com/groups/slgriefbuild/ - Second Life Griefbuild Digest, pictures of horrible ad griefing and land spam, and the naming of names
|
Llauren Mandelbrot
Twenty-Four Weeks Old.
Join date: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 665
|
09-29-2006 13:20
You are right, on one level, and wrong on another.
True, you cannot SET those permissions, but you can still make Second life synthesize them.
|
Dr Tardis
Registered User
Join date: 3 Nov 2005
Posts: 426
|
09-29-2006 15:13
You're not supposed to be able to set an item no copy/no transfer. The two options are mutually exclusive for a reason: It's not fair to tell someone that they can't re-sell an item you sold them, unless you're giving them the privelage of making copies of it.
Why is it so important that you preven people from re-selling your art? Being able to resell an item is a fundamental right of ownership, and if you do manage to make your items no-copy AND no-transfer, you will almost certainly end up lowering the sale value of your items (I don't think I'd buy an item that I could neither copy or sell - it's just too easy to lose my only copy and be completely screwed).
It IS possible to force an item to be no copy/no transfer by placing an inventory item inside that is the complement of what you want: so if your item is no copy, then place a no-transfer item inside. Just make sure that both items are no-mod, so people can't pull the inventory items out.
However, rather than do that, I strongly encourage you to examine the reaosn you're trying to do this and decide whether it's really necessary.
|
Whimsycallie Pegler
Registered User
Join date: 28 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,003
|
09-29-2006 15:58
If you want it to be a one of a kind art piece you should mark it no copy. Let whoever buys it resell it if they want. There will always be one of it out there unless you yourself release another copy.
If you want a specific person to have it (and no one else) sell it no Transfer. What difference does it make if this one person can have a zillion copies. They can only keep them for themselves. I guess theoretically they could cover thier casle with your single artwork, or put a copy in several properties they rent. That is the only drawback I can see.
|
Dallas Prudhomme
Registered User
Join date: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 30
|
Makes Sense
09-29-2006 17:46
I appreciate the comments and have taken them to heart. I offer very good customer service at my gallery, including reframing something if the client finds it doesn't work in their home as is. This requires the ability to transfer the item back to me. So I will probably continue doing business as I have been... with the ability to transfer it on. And hopefully have many happy, pleased customers!
Thanks again, Dallas Prudhomme The Sanctualary Art Gallery
|
Joannah Cramer
Registered User
Join date: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,539
|
09-29-2006 18:19
From: Dallas Prudhomme I offer very good customer service at my gallery, including reframing something if the client finds it doesn't work in their home as is. This requires the ability to transfer the item back to me. It's possible for the person who owns the item to (temporarily) grant you modify rights to their posessions. Not sure if they extend to full edit range, but possibly it's one way to work around the transfer lock in situation you describe o.O;
|
Kim Manilow
total spaz
Join date: 8 Jun 2004
Posts: 154
|
09-29-2006 18:31
If you put a script that is copy only inside an item that is resell only, you get no mod/no copy/no trans permissions. I'm trying to figure out if this is a bug or a feature. 
|
Hopping Grasshopper
Member
Join date: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 41
|
09-30-2006 07:11
From: Kim Manilow If you put a script that is copy only inside an item that is resell only, you get no mod/no copy/no trans permissions. I'm trying to figure out if this is a bug or a feature.  The items permission inside of it carries over when rezed. If someone deleted the scripts inside, it would become transferable.
|
Kim Manilow
total spaz
Join date: 8 Jun 2004
Posts: 154
|
09-30-2006 09:12
From: Hopping Grasshopper The items permission inside of it carries over when rezed. If someone deleted the scripts inside, it would become transferable. Ok, then make the script resell only and the item copy only. Then it is permantly no mod/no copy/no trans. I thought this wasn't possible. Has it always been this way?
|
Wolfram Szymborska
Registered User
Join date: 19 May 2006
Posts: 1
|
11-01-2006 12:23
Simple: lock the item.
|
Dr Tardis
Registered User
Join date: 3 Nov 2005
Posts: 426
|
11-01-2006 15:02
Either way, using that to get around the design of the system could be considered an exploit, and is against the TOS. The system is designed not to allow you to select no copy and no transfer at the same time. Using scripts to get around that is, in effect, an exploit. You could post in Linden Answers and see if a Linden has an opinion.
|