These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
libalphafy still needed in 1.12.1.13? |
|
Hel Jezebel
Registered User
Join date: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 52
|
10-02-2006 20:09
I haven't used SL in about a month, real life was eating my free time. I see a number of posts about graphics and such in the lastest version, and just have one question. Is it still recommended/needed to run the libalphafy hack to have clothes and skin display properly, or has that been fixed? Thanks!
|
Kel Hartunian
Reformed Solipsist
Join date: 6 May 2006
Posts: 28
|
10-02-2006 20:13
I've been regretting deleting libalpafy a month or two ago during some /home housecleaning. I really want to try it to see if it clears up the issue. The relevant code/link aren't on the forum due to the regrettably (but understandably) short history.
Rock on, -Kel _____________________
|
Hel Jezebel
Registered User
Join date: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 52
|
10-02-2006 20:18
Erm, it's right there. Several pages back now, but that's what search is for.
![]() I'm gonna just log in and see if it runs without it, if I can get it to log in. It's whining about libstdc, which seems to be something related to GCC. *shrug* I'll poke at it a bit more, but in the meanwhile, if someone could offer a definite answer about libalphafy, it'd be appreciated! |
Drake Bacon
Linux is Furry
Join date: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 443
|
10-03-2006 07:56
You don't need it now. That was fixed some time ago, pre-Tofu.
|
Tofu Linden
Linden Lab Employee
Join date: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 471
|
10-03-2006 08:21
There are clothing rendering issues for some people in 1.12.1.13, but I believe that the root cause is different from the one addressed by libalphafy. This should be fixed in tomorrow's release.
|