Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

1.17.3.0 Client

Seven Nishizawa
Registered User
Join date: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 2
07-06-2007 05:51
Am I the only one who's noticed a performance increase instead of decrease after this (optional) update? After reading the replies to the blog post, I seemed to notice a lot of Windows users' performance decreasing... but I'm floating like a little bumblebee. Should I be thanking the OSS Devs, the Labs, Tofu...?
JessyAnne Theas
Cliqueless
Join date: 9 May 2007
Posts: 610
07-06-2007 06:14
Good luck with that. The update crashed SL for me, and no longer opens. I get "An error has occurred, SL will shut down" Everytime
Ceemore Paine
Registered User
Join date: 23 Jun 2007
Posts: 10
07-06-2007 07:41
Big performance increase for me. Just wish the idle/afk worked again. It has been non-working since 1.17.1.0
Ilobmirt Tenk
Registered User
Join date: 4 Jun 2007
Posts: 135
07-06-2007 08:15
I noticed no performance decrease since 1.17.2.0
I however did get a crash within the hour.
I'll try it a few times more with all the advanced graphics options enabled to see if all the graphics issues associated with the more advanced graphics options are more stable.
Brian Ormsby
Registered User
Join date: 6 Jan 2007
Posts: 5
07-06-2007 08:38
My experience with the client is great so far. Mine crashed once right after I just started using the new client, after I started it back up, everything was fine the rest of the night. I noticed that it was using a little less memory than the last release when I looked at the process in top. Now we need that gstreamer fix.
Jessica Hultcrantz
Knoppix and Debian addict
Join date: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 28
Looks promising to me
07-06-2007 08:44
I haven't run it for long yet, but it looks promising in using lesser resources.
No crash, and it works on a machine that has crashed ever since VWR-1184 was found, so thumbs up from me. I can't really say if there is a good increase in performance, but it is definitively nothing near a decrease. I would say a slight increase probably :-)