The Tao of Volunteers has some new changes. http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Tao_of_Volunteers
Do you like the changes.
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Support for Tao of Volunteers Consequences |
|
Destiny Niles
Registered User
Join date: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 949
|
11-22-2007 19:21
The Tao of Volunteers has some new changes. http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Tao_of_Volunteers
Do you like the changes. |
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
|
11-22-2007 20:21
I think the group should really just be made "no chat whatsoever" and strictly enforced.
People who ask a question get jumped on, people who answer a question get jumped on, if you IM privately you get your nose bitten off and there's far too many things that shouldn't go on the group in the first place. |
Gwyneth Llewelyn
Winking Loudmouth
![]() Join date: 31 Jul 2004
Posts: 1,336
|
11-27-2007 07:21
While the Tao in itself is ok (a "Mission Statement" kind of thing, stating clear guidelines), the enforcement rules are vague, and more dangerous than that, they're arbitrary (it depends on the person doing the enforcement). I definitely support having clear guidelines (which we have), but I would also require clear enforcement rules (which we don't).
_____________________
![]() ![]() |
Bobbyb30 Zohari
SL Mentor Coach
Join date: 11 Nov 2006
Posts: 466
|
11-30-2007 13:13
I think the group should really just be made "no chat whatsoever" and strictly enforced. People who ask a question get jumped on, people who answer a question get jumped on, if you IM privately you get your nose bitten off and there's far too many things that shouldn't go on the group in the first place. No chat? Then this group would die like all other groups with no chat. _____________________
|