RE: Build Extends onto Linden Land

In reference to Mister Normandy's earlier post and your reply Guy, I think we need a clear definition of what's acceptable for overhanging protected land.

The group I founded, TempleNET, owns the build that's overhanging the wall at Aplasta 173, 192. We've owned the property for about 8 months and the Temple of the Journey has been in place for about 6.

In all this time, not one single time has anyone contacted myself or the builder regarding this build impeding their use and enjoyment of the great wall or it's overhanging onto the land, something that was done so pedestrians on the wall could easily climb on.

Now you've sent an IM citing a complaint to the builder, while the OP was in fact just inquiring, so I'm curious as to who's complaining and why we're forced to alter or destroy such a beautiful build that does nothing but enhance the experience of fellow residents.

Edit: I confirmed with Landing Normandy, his post was not a complaint about our build, merely an inquiry.

I await your answer,
Kris Ming

Hello Kristan. I have discussed this issue with the creator of the build and we feel the issue is resolved.

As I said before, we never suggest or approve building on or over Protected Land. It is a gray area and a black and white policy might result in the removal of a number of builds that really pose no real problem.