Seller creates an object in world and sets Next Owner to +M -C +T (yes modify, no copy, yes transfer). These are 'baked' into the Asset when the object is taken into inventory.
Seller takes the item into inventory, opens its property box and sees that the Next Owner permissions are +M -C +T still. This is because the Inventory Item has its permissions bits set based on the Asset when it is taken.
(It is important to note that an Inventory Item is a link with some meta information to an actual Asset. An Inventory Item is NOT an Asset)
Seller changes the permissions on the Inventory Item to -M -C +T. NOTE: This doesn't change any permissions on the Asset! Only on the inventory item.
Seller gives the item to Buyer. Buyer looks at the permissions of the Inventory Item and sees Current Owner permissions of -M -C +T. Also Next Owner permissions are not enabled.
Buyer rezes the item, and notes the object has Current Owner permissions of -M +C -T. Yay! That is correct! Everyone is happy!
Seller takes the item into inventory, opens its property box and sees that the Next Owner permissions are +M -C +T still. This is because the Inventory Item has its permissions bits set based on the Asset when it is taken.
(It is important to note that an Inventory Item is a link with some meta information to an actual Asset. An Inventory Item is NOT an Asset)
Seller changes the permissions on the Inventory Item to -M -C +T. NOTE: This doesn't change any permissions on the Asset! Only on the inventory item.
Seller gives the item to Buyer. Buyer looks at the permissions of the Inventory Item and sees Current Owner permissions of -M -C +T. Also Next Owner permissions are not enabled.
Buyer rezes the item, and notes the object has Current Owner permissions of -M +C -T. Yay! That is correct! Everyone is happy!
If you started by setting the permissions as +M -C +T, and then changed them to -M -C +T (in inventory or elsewhere) then why is it correct for the buyer to have -M +C -T permissions? Is this a typo, or am I missing something fundamental?
I have fixed my original post: