( I wont quote the whole thing just a link
/139/e1/113044/1.html )
I would ask do you still maintain this fallacy ?
I refer in particular to :
You openly allow under age gambling and pornography.
to which your reply was :
Those are unfair generalizations. We certainly don't allow underage gambling and pornography--on Teen Second Life, games must be of skill, not chance, and porn is most certainly isn't allowed there either.
Would you deny that it is entirely possible for a 14year old who is unconcerned with lying about their age to :
create an account,
log in,
Beg, Solicit or visit enough money trees to raise some money,
visit a casino and gamble that money
use the winnings from the casino to visit a pay-for-view pornography cinema
( thereby seeing an RL porn film )
use what is left to go to a club and be "serviced" by an escort
And still have time to do their homework ?
I am curious, and although I am not a parent or a news reporter I am sure people in both of those categories would be extremely interested in reading your reply ( if there is one ).