Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Those little red lines! Those little red lines!

Fiona Cork
Registered User
Join date: 24 Apr 2006
Posts: 3
06-21-2006 23:34
Why do people surround completely empty lots with little red lines that say "no entry" In a game where you can lock everything - what can you possibly be afraid of? What could possibly happen if someone could walk onto your land. No one can steal anything unless you let them. with no copy/ no transfer / no modify - right? So why is it important to keep land private? I am just not getting this.

Could someone explain this practice to me, so maybe I won't grind my teeth everytime i accidently bouce off someones land?
Banking Laws
Realty Serious
Join date: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 602
06-21-2006 23:45
From: Fiona Cork
Why do people surround completely empty lots with little red lines that say "no entry" In a game where you can lock everything - what can you possibly be afraid of? What could possibly happen if someone could walk onto your land. No one can steal anything unless you let them. with no copy/ no transfer / no modify - right? So why is it important to keep land private? I am just not getting this.

Could someone explain this practice to me, so maybe I won't grind my teeth everytime i accidently bouce off someones land?


Because even in a game some people like at least the illusion of privacy?
_____________________
"I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid in posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."

- Thomas Jefferson, 3rd U.S. President
Tsukasa Karuna
Master of all things desu
Join date: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 370
06-22-2006 01:02
Because the greifing situation has become bad enough that the new players are paranoid after being orbited from orientation island?
_____________________
".. who as of 5 seconds ago is no longer the deliverator.."
Jillian Callahan
Rotary-winged Neko Girl
Join date: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 3,766
06-22-2006 01:32
and a goodly portion just don't know that happens. Talk kindly and politely to your ban-line surrounded neighbors and you'll often find that they'd just been toying with the tools, or were misinformed as to thier function.
_____________________
Richard Meiklejohn
Registered User
Join date: 15 May 2006
Posts: 45
06-22-2006 02:38
What's really dumb is people who put their land up for sale but leave the access restriction. So you can't actually go check the view from the parcel. I've seen it three times just yesterday! And of course with the height raised to 200m flying around to look for land means constantly bumping to a stop :-(
Selador Cellardoor
Registered User
Join date: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 3,082
06-22-2006 02:40
Because people come to a place which is outside the real world, a world which has no boundaries, no restrictions to your imagination, in which you are free to create, to explore, to fly, to socialise. And all they can think about is making money and putting up fences to keep other people out.

It seems to me that more and more Second Life is taking on all the undesirable qualities of the real world.
_____________________
Hiro Queso
503less
Join date: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 2,753
06-22-2006 07:31
From: Selador Cellardoor
Because people come to a place which is outside the real world, a world which has no boundaries, no restrictions to your imagination, in which you are free to create, to explore, to fly, to socialise. And all they can think about is making money and putting up fences to keep other people out.

It seems to me that more and more Second Life is taking on all the undesirable qualities of the real world.


But you also have to appreciate that for some, SL is pretty much their RL, and just like RL, they want privacy. That being said, I am not a fan of the ban lines (though it's the lesser of evils compared to some of the security scripts/devices), and the 200m limit is just plain ridiculous. It doesn't address any privacy or griefing problems, but instead creates mobility problems :(
_____________________
Haravikk Mistral
Registered User
Join date: 8 Oct 2005
Posts: 2,482
06-22-2006 08:09
It's to stop people listening in to your conversations, just like in RL or in instant messages I'd like to know that my conversations aren't being listened to by everyone that happens to pass by unless I'm in one of the public areas. I know SL has IM functionality too, but it shouldn't really be needed, especially if you want to have a conversation with a group of people without having to do that thing with calling cards all the time.
_____________________
Computer (Mac Pro):
2 x Quad Core 3.2ghz Xeon
10gb DDR2 800mhz FB-DIMMS
4 x 750gb, 32mb cache hard-drives (RAID-0/striped)
NVidia GeForce 8800GT (512mb)
Hiro Queso
503less
Join date: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 2,753
06-22-2006 08:15
From: Haravikk Mistral
It's to stop people listening in to your conversations, just like in RL or in instant messages I'd like to know that my conversations aren't being listened to by everyone that happens to pass by unless I'm in one of the public areas. I know SL has IM functionality too, but it shouldn't really be needed, especially if you want to have a conversation with a group of people without having to do that thing with calling cards all the time.


But extending banlines up to 200m is not a solution. For a start, unless ytou have a large plot, someone can stand right next to your plot at ground level and listen. A solution, for example, would be an option to restrict chat range to the parcel only.
_____________________
Haravikk Mistral
Registered User
Join date: 8 Oct 2005
Posts: 2,482
06-22-2006 08:18
Oh I don't agree with that, but the person was asking why people want privacy features :)

I'm more for a better solution that lets you restrict chat on a parcel or area basis. In favour of per-area as a parcel-wide setting means that people who fly onto your parcel can still eavesdrop.
_____________________
Computer (Mac Pro):
2 x Quad Core 3.2ghz Xeon
10gb DDR2 800mhz FB-DIMMS
4 x 750gb, 32mb cache hard-drives (RAID-0/striped)
NVidia GeForce 8800GT (512mb)
Hiro Queso
503less
Join date: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 2,753
06-22-2006 08:25
From: Haravikk Mistral
Oh I don't agree with that, but the person was asking why people want privacy features :)

I'm more for a better solution that lets you restrict chat on a parcel or area basis. In favour of per-area as a parcel-wide setting means that people who fly onto your parcel can still eavesdrop.


*nods*

I'm sure there are many ways privacy can be addressed, I just can't see how raising banlines to 200m addresses that problem.
_____________________
Siobhan Taylor
Nemesis
Join date: 13 Aug 2003
Posts: 5,476
06-22-2006 08:26
From: Richard Meiklejohn
What's really dumb is people who put their land up for sale but leave the access restriction. So you can't actually go check the view from the parcel. I've seen it three times just yesterday! And of course with the height raised to 200m flying around to look for land means constantly bumping to a stop :-(


Of course, it'd be fun watching the land-swoopers crash into the ban-lines ...
_____________________
http://siobhantaylor.wordpress.com/
Hiro Queso
503less
Join date: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 2,753
06-22-2006 08:32
From: Siobhan Taylor
Of course, it'd be fun watching the land-swoopers crash into the ban-lines ...


LOL that reminds me of a post made a while ago I forget who). Someone cut a 16m2 plot in the middle of a huge plot and set it to sell for 0L. The larger surrounding plot was set to 'no acceess'. I think it was called landbaron-pong or something :D
_____________________
Haravikk Mistral
Registered User
Join date: 8 Oct 2005
Posts: 2,482
06-22-2006 08:35
From: Hiro Queso
I'm sure there are many ways privacy can be addressed, I just can't see how raising banlines to 200m addresses that problem.

Yeah, my post is badly phrased actually I realise. Didn't mean I disagree with you, meant I disagree with the 200m ban-lines being added.
I can't fly in any direction away from my home without hitting them after a few seconds of traveling, the sim I'm in is fairly okay, but surrounding ones are a nightmare now, and there's rarely anyone even on the offending parcels (In fact I've NEVER seen anyone on the ones I bump into the most often).
_____________________
Computer (Mac Pro):
2 x Quad Core 3.2ghz Xeon
10gb DDR2 800mhz FB-DIMMS
4 x 750gb, 32mb cache hard-drives (RAID-0/striped)
NVidia GeForce 8800GT (512mb)
Fiona Cork
Registered User
Join date: 24 Apr 2006
Posts: 3
Re:
06-22-2006 09:04
From: Haravikk Mistral
It's to stop people listening in to your conversations, just like in RL or in instant messages I'd like to know that my conversations aren't being listened to by everyone that happens to pass by unless I'm in one of the public areas. I know SL has IM functionality too, but it shouldn't really be needed, especially if you want to have a conversation with a group of people without having to do that thing with calling cards all the time.


I hadn't thought of that. I could understand that - that makes me feel a little better. So if someone owns a 512 piece of land and if I am standing next door on my piece of land and the put the ban lines up I won't be able to hear them?
Barbarra Blair
Short Person
Join date: 18 Apr 2004
Posts: 588
06-22-2006 09:14
Yes you will hear them. And you can watch them with your camera, but that is against the TOS. Of course, I don't know how they would know if someone were watching them with a camera.Ban lines are just annoying and have no good reason for existing.
_____________________
--Obvious Lady
Teddy Wishbringer
Snuggly Bear Cub
Join date: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 208
06-22-2006 11:26
From: Barbarra Blair
Yes you will hear them. And you can watch them with your camera, but that is against the TOS.


Just out of curiousity, which section of the TOS does that violate? While I agree I shouldn't have to buy a huge chunk of land to put a little house in the middle and ban lines around so people can't camera in my house, but I don't recall seeing anything in the TOS that addresses that.

The only thing I saw was a blurb about 'recording conversations'.
Banking Laws
Realty Serious
Join date: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 602
06-22-2006 13:36
From: Barbarra Blair
Yes you will hear them. And you can watch them with your camera, but that is against the TOS. Of course, I don't know how they would know if someone were watching them with a camera.Ban lines are just annoying and have no good reason for existing.


Ban lines have many good reasons for existing. Privacy, security, and a feeling of more safety. A good example would be a discussion group for recovering stalking victims.
_____________________
"I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid in posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."

- Thomas Jefferson, 3rd U.S. President
Merlyn Bailly
owner, AVALON GALLERIA
Join date: 7 Sep 2005
Posts: 576
06-22-2006 15:37
From: Fiona Cork
Why do people surround completely empty lots with little red lines that say "no entry" In a game where you can lock everything - what can you possibly be afraid of? What could possibly happen if someone could walk onto your land. No one can steal anything unless you let them. with no copy/ no transfer / no modify - right? So why is it important to keep land private? I am just not getting this.

Could someone explain this practice to me, so maybe I won't grind my teeth everytime i accidently bouce off someones land?


/108/11/113337/1.html
_____________________
SL used to be a game -- now it's a corporate advertising/marketing platform.
Doc Nielsen
Fallen...
Join date: 13 Apr 2005
Posts: 1,059
06-22-2006 15:46
Red lines? I just got trapped in Miller between two properties with access lines and a third with PASS lines - yes, pass lines go to 400m now... :mad:

How did I get in that predicament? Someone unknown hit me with sometthing in Honawan, and I landed in a trap constructed of 'anti-griefer' measures! *shakes head in disbelief*
_____________________
All very well for people to have a sig that exhorts you to 'be the change' - I wonder if it's ever occurred to them that they might be something that needs changing...?
Ryder Spearmann
Early Adopter
Join date: 1 May 2006
Posts: 216
Look, folks, it's simple
06-27-2006 12:37
The reason SO many "red lines" are up is because that land owners simply don't know it.

*I* had to ask live help to learn how to do it, so I could explain to all my neighbors how to turn them off.

Every last person that I have IM'd about the ban lines had *no idea* that they were on.

Think people. The ban lines can not be seen by the owners... and there is NOTHING that tells them (in the interface) that they are on.

Many of the ban lines are turned on by newbies... they add their friends to the allow list, and have NOT THE SLIGHTEST CLUE that they are erecting 200m walls of glass.

It's that simple.

It's not thought. It's not privacy. It's not griefers.

It's largly ignorance... and a sucky and heavy handed feature that LL was insane to implement.
LupineFox Paz
Registered User
Join date: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 60
06-27-2006 14:00
The roads don't work for driving because of the clunky interface. now you can't use a vehicle to fly either because of the stupid ban lines!

Honestly - 200m? and 400 for passpay
Wanda Rich
Registered User
Join date: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 320
06-28-2006 11:23
From: Ryder Spearmann
The reason SO many "red lines" are up is because that land owners simply don't know it.

*I* had to ask live help to learn how to do it, so I could explain to all my neighbors how to turn them off.

Every last person that I have IM'd about the ban lines had *no idea* that they were on.

Think people. The ban lines can not be seen by the owners... and there is NOTHING that tells them (in the interface) that they are on.

Many of the ban lines are turned on by newbies... they add their friends to the allow list, and have NOT THE SLIGHTEST CLUE that they are erecting 200m walls of glass.

It's that simple.

It's not thought. It's not privacy. It's not griefers.

It's largly ignorance... and a sucky and heavy handed feature that LL was insane to implement.


I had no idea that was a feature. I thought it was a freebie script some moron had made :eek:
My respect for the lindens just dropped a long way.
Do Lindens even realise the text bleeds through neighbours walls?