Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

"Most world currency markets move less than that, but not tremendously less."

Anna Bobbysocks
Registered User
Join date: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 373
03-30-2006 14:13
Ahh, philip, target inflation rate is 2-3% per annum. Right now,we're experiencing about 50% per annum.

Can you say hyperinflation?

Holy sheet!
Ricky Zamboni
Private citizen
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,080
03-30-2006 15:25
I think Philip has confused volatility with trending.

Volatility: Variations of an asset price around a value. This is due to difference in investor priorities or information and is associated with the riskiness of an asset. This is what wouldn't be unusual to see around 20% per year. For reference, the USD/EUR exchange rate sees an annual volatility in the 7-10% range.

Mean reversion (trending): When an asset value tends toward some value. This is often seen as "seasonality" in commodity prices -- heating oil is more expensive in the winter than it is in the summer. This can also appear as a long-term trend upward or downward. That's what we're seeing in the L$/US$ exchange rate. This is what is pushing the 20% per year change. Not a good thing.

The only major currency I could find that has taken that kind of hit lately is the New Zealand Dollar (NZD), which has dropped by around the same amount as the L$ (~20% in 5 months), which has been a *big deal*. Other than that, we're seeing 5-month peak-to-peak movements like 4% (USD/CAD), 5% (USD/GBP), 6% (USD/EUR), etc.

The difference between volatility and a trend can be seen in this chart. Both the currencies in this chart have comparable volatilities. However, the long-term trend is clearly different. So, the statement that "In the last 5 months or so, the Lindex has moved about 20% in terms of the exchange rate. Most world currency markets move less than that, but not tremendously less." is a little misleading.

Schwanson Schlegel
SL's Tokin' Villain
Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 2,721
03-30-2006 16:37
........................................................
_____________________
Pham Neutra
Registered User
Join date: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 478
Let's do some real inflation!
03-30-2006 20:59
What worries me more with Phillip's reply is the open invitation to convert L$ devaluation at the LindeX to inworld inflation:
From: Philip Linden
The absolute rate (250:1, or 275:1, or 300:1, etc) isn't really that important, because if it changes slowly, folks can just reprice goods and services as desired to match their prices to a desired 'real-world' value.
If residents would do this, we really would start runaway inflation (20% in 6 month, 10% in the last 40 days). An interesting suggestion to be brought forward by the head of a (virtual) country. ;)
Maxx Monde
Registered User
Join date: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,848
03-31-2006 04:42
I've believed this for some time - Pham Neutra at SLOG is the true economist in this caterwauling wailing cesspool of the forums. Pham, write more articles, I really enjoy reading them. (Seriously, I do, I'm not being a smartass.)

I only see third-party currencies as an attemp to extract yet another premium, at the same time, cornering a market by creating it out of thin air. Ambitous, but the Hunt Brothers learned the hard way - the market doesn't care if you *think* you are right. :)

Its been fun seeing the relative hysteria over a 50 L$ fluctuation in price. It would be a real treat to see you guys trade futures, you'd probably shit your socks, with the volatility and all.

Eh, keep it up, I'm amused.

Pham, get writing!
_____________________
Opensim Tutorial - http://opensimuser.wordpress.com/2008/06/15/opensim-install-and-configuration-tutorial/

Run your own simulator on your personal machine!