Ahh, philip, target inflation rate is 2-3% per annum. Right now,we're experiencing about 50% per annum.
Can you say hyperinflation?
Holy sheet!
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
"Most world currency markets move less than that, but not tremendously less." |
|
Anna Bobbysocks
Registered User
Join date: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 373
|
03-30-2006 14:13
Ahh, philip, target inflation rate is 2-3% per annum. Right now,we're experiencing about 50% per annum.
Can you say hyperinflation? Holy sheet! |
Ricky Zamboni
Private citizen
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,080
|
03-30-2006 15:25
I think Philip has confused volatility with trending.
Volatility: Variations of an asset price around a value. This is due to difference in investor priorities or information and is associated with the riskiness of an asset. This is what wouldn't be unusual to see around 20% per year. For reference, the USD/EUR exchange rate sees an annual volatility in the 7-10% range. Mean reversion (trending): When an asset value tends toward some value. This is often seen as "seasonality" in commodity prices -- heating oil is more expensive in the winter than it is in the summer. This can also appear as a long-term trend upward or downward. That's what we're seeing in the L$/US$ exchange rate. This is what is pushing the 20% per year change. Not a good thing. The only major currency I could find that has taken that kind of hit lately is the New Zealand Dollar (NZD), which has dropped by around the same amount as the L$ (~20% in 5 months), which has been a *big deal*. Other than that, we're seeing 5-month peak-to-peak movements like 4% (USD/CAD), 5% (USD/GBP), 6% (USD/EUR), etc. The difference between volatility and a trend can be seen in this chart. Both the currencies in this chart have comparable volatilities. However, the long-term trend is clearly different. So, the statement that "In the last 5 months or so, the Lindex has moved about 20% in terms of the exchange rate. Most world currency markets move less than that, but not tremendously less." is a little misleading. ![]() |
Schwanson Schlegel
SL's Tokin' Villain
![]() Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 2,721
|
03-30-2006 16:37
![]() ![]() _____________________
![]() |
Pham Neutra
Registered User
Join date: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
Let's do some real inflation!
03-30-2006 20:59
What worries me more with Phillip's reply is the open invitation to convert L$ devaluation at the LindeX to inworld inflation:
The absolute rate (250:1, or 275:1, or 300:1, etc) isn't really that important, because if it changes slowly, folks can just reprice goods and services as desired to match their prices to a desired 'real-world' value. ![]() |
Maxx Monde
Registered User
Join date: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,848
|
03-31-2006 04:42
I've believed this for some time - Pham Neutra at SLOG is the true economist in this caterwauling wailing cesspool of the forums. Pham, write more articles, I really enjoy reading them. (Seriously, I do, I'm not being a smartass.)
I only see third-party currencies as an attemp to extract yet another premium, at the same time, cornering a market by creating it out of thin air. Ambitous, but the Hunt Brothers learned the hard way - the market doesn't care if you *think* you are right. ![]() Its been fun seeing the relative hysteria over a 50 L$ fluctuation in price. It would be a real treat to see you guys trade futures, you'd probably shit your socks, with the volatility and all. Eh, keep it up, I'm amused. Pham, get writing! _____________________
Opensim Tutorial - http://opensimuser.wordpress.com/2008/06/15/opensim-install-and-configuration-tutorial/
Run your own simulator on your personal machine! |