Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
L$ Falling Again... Support at 3.40's |
|
|
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
|
08-31-2005 08:23
Not surprisingly, given the recent GOM announcements, the L$ has fallen sharply. Its trading in the 3.40's range on the sell side.
|
|
Merwan Marker
Booring...
Join date: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,706
|
08-31-2005 08:30
Are you Blaze?
_____________________
Don't Worry, Be Happy - Meher Baba
|
|
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
|
08-31-2005 08:35
I am not.
|
|
blaze Spinnaker
1/2 Serious
Join date: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 5,898
|
08-31-2005 09:13
I bet he's Alby
Or she. I keep forgetting that jamie is she. Or maybe Athlieu. I dunno. Alts are so amusingly complex. _____________________
Taken from The last paragraph on pg. 16 of Cory Ondrejka's paper "Changing Realities: User Creation, Communication, and Innovation in Digital Worlds :
"User-created content takes the idea of leveraging player opinions a step further by allowing them to effectively prototype new ideas and features. Developers can then measure which new concepts most improve the products and incorporate them into the game in future patches." |
|
Merwan Marker
Booring...
Join date: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,706
|
08-31-2005 09:20
Well WTF do i know - I'm just a bitter blaming liein' celeb-wanna be spewing forum vernom!
So never mind!  _____________________
Don't Worry, Be Happy - Meher Baba
|
|
Hair Akebono
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2004
Posts: 135
|
08-31-2005 09:22
Getting back on subject
 I think IGE have also stopped buying the last few days. It usually signals a drop in L$ value from my experience as people desperate to sell go to GOM or another currency trader. |
|
blaze Spinnaker
1/2 Serious
Join date: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 5,898
|
08-31-2005 09:25
Well WTF do i know - I'm just a bitter blaming liein' celeb-wanna be spewing forum vernom! So never mind! Ahaha, Merwan, you easily make my top ten list! It's something like you, Ulrika, Coconaut, Prokofy (sure do miss him), Anshe, Aimee. Well, Aimee is probably more subconcious than concious. And she rarely comes out to play unless you prod her. Oh yeah, and definitely Malachi lately. He's like .. on fire! Chip could probably make the list but he's too bitter. And really, he just focuses on me. Ok, he's not on the list. OH, yeah, and you can't forget Jau of course! He's like probably at the top. If I missed you it's only because you don't start enough threads. Nothing personal, I just have this requirement that you have to be self absorbed. _____________________
Taken from The last paragraph on pg. 16 of Cory Ondrejka's paper "Changing Realities: User Creation, Communication, and Innovation in Digital Worlds :
"User-created content takes the idea of leveraging player opinions a step further by allowing them to effectively prototype new ideas and features. Developers can then measure which new concepts most improve the products and incorporate them into the game in future patches." |
|
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
|
08-31-2005 09:28
Well WTF do i know - I'm just a bitter blaming liein' celeb-wanna be spewing forum vernom! So never mind! Merwan, you are hilarious, you silly willy! |
|
Sparkle Skye
Second Life Resident
Join date: 27 Oct 2004
Posts: 1,016
|
08-31-2005 16:46
It seems amazing that the decline of the $L seems to correlate so closely with GOM's mystifying decision to allow partial fill of orders, despite their assurance that it would have no market impact and that detracters of the system were howled down.
Now, looking at the market we see a huge glut of large sums of $L's at low low prices. What better way to sabotage a market? Flood it with cheap L's and point the finger elsewhere as to the causes of the decline. One can only speculate what large holders of L's would be so eager to dump them off so cheaply, and what their motivations may be. |
|
Hair Akebono
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2004
Posts: 135
|
09-01-2005 01:04
It seems amazing that the decline of the $L seems to correlate so closely with GOM's mystifying decision to allow partial fill of orders, despite their assurance that it would have no market impact and that detracters of the system were howled down. If you did a historical analysis of the L$ price then you would see the decline was already in place long before partial fills was put in place. /120/15/57905/1.html#post608094 |