More than a year ago I fell out in forum with a well known person who probably fell out with more persons than anyone in forum history, and suffered for it.
Unfortunately I owned, and still do, land adjacent to hers, and to my astonishment she brought her forum animosity into the world, and set up a ban list on the relevant plots. Banning me and several she guessed (largely erroneously) to be my alts.
I could easily fly over, and if this made her feel better, I did not much mind. I refrained from responding with any reciprocal ban, preferring to hope the animosity would die. This is how the situation remained for a long time (can it be a year ?).
But when I returned to find the ban height at 200m, this was no longer a mere inconvenience. This altered things.
I reversed my decision of a year ago, and set up a blanket ban. This would present her and her tenants and their customers with the same annoying glass wall on the boundary as I was enduring. I was hoping she would receive some puzzled complaints, realise my reasons, and correct the situation, or at least contact me to negotiate.
I have now heard from her, explained the situation, and I have offered to remove all bans if she unbans me, suggesting friendly cooperation.
I tell you this story not because I think it interesting in itself, but because it illustrates how raising the ban height to 200, and now, it seems, 768m has the unfortunate result of elevating neighbor-to-neighbor ban line griefing from a small annoyance to a major thing.
Many people must be experiencing this unfortunate side-effect. Lets hope that in most cases it encourages de-escalation rather than the opposite, though in my case I am not hopeful.
There are much worse situations, of course, where a bully surrounds and isolates someone he wants to buy out. At 768m this will now be a true nightmare. Fortunately my neighbor and I are not in that situation, but heaven help those who are.