|
Huns Valen
Don't PM me here.
Join date: 3 May 2003
Posts: 2,749
|
03-28-2004 06:19
first(integer n) {
second(n);
}
second(integer n) {
llSay(0, (string)n);
}
Doesn't compile. Gives an erroneous error message about the number of args being wrong! The LSL compiler should either figure out forward references automatically or allow us to prototype our functions a la C/C++:
// prototype
second(integer n);
// now this works
first(integer n) {
second(n);
}
second(integer n) {
llSay(0, (string)n);
}
|
|
Abraham Stonehill
Junior Member
Join date: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 5
|
03-28-2004 08:50
I endorse this suggestion.
|
|
Christopher Omega
Oxymoron
Join date: 28 Mar 2003
Posts: 1,828
|
03-28-2004 14:50
I endorce this fully. Perhaps make it transparent to the user, to follow java's example.
It is currently transparent for void-arg functions, why not make it for all?
|
|
Oz Spade
ReadsNoPostLongerThanHand
Join date: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 2,708
|
03-28-2004 18:44
I endorse this idea/feature.
_____________________
"Don't anticipate outcome," the man said. "Await the unfolding of events. Remain in the moment." - Konrad
|
|
Carnildo Greenacre
Flight Engineer
Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,044
|
03-29-2004 00:05
Implementing this would allow for co-recursive functions. Not a common technique, but a useful one sometimes.
_____________________
perl -le '$_ = 1; (1 x $_) !~ /^(11+)\1+$/ && print while $_++;'
|