I know that this is where we're supposed to test out our ideas in the court of public opinion before posting them to JIRA as change requests. However, this issue has such broad-reaching ramifications that I decided to cut to the chase:
http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/SVC-2585
Please visit this entry, and vote. We need to have this fixed right away.
Automatic emails generated in response to abuse reports once contained the following critical information in the subject line of the message:
* the name of the sim
* the SLURL for the exact location within that sim
* the category of AR it was
* the name of the person being reported
* the subject line from the AR as originally created by the user recipient of the email
* the number of the return ticket (the AR number).
All of this information except the very last item has now been removed, rendering these return receipt emails completely useless from the user standpoint. All the user now has is an AR number, and the date on which he or she received it.
The removal of this information affects more than just the individual user, who now has no way at all of correlating the receipt of an abuse report with an in-world event, or even verifying that they have received the correct AR number in the email subject. The much vaunted Linden Lab goal of citizen self-governance is ill served by removing this small bit of information that used to be given out with the abuse report return emails. The information is vital for groups and organizations to keep track of trouble makers, and is one of the critical ways estate managers keep track of them.
I propose that this this information not only be restored to the email headers on the response to abuse reports, but that the body of the abuse report be included. Ironically, when you file a JIRA item, it sends you the entire posting as a confirmation, so it's obviously not a technical problem to do this.
Including a verbatim copy of the body of the original author's abuse report would be a nice and welcome improvement to the abuse report system, greatly enhancing the usefulness of the AR emails, and would go a long way toward improving the impression of transparency of the abuse reporting process without compromising account privacy in the least.
I propose that in addition to fixing what is apparently (and hopefully) a simple oversight, that the body of the abuse report be quoted in the body of the return email received by citizens when abuse reports are filed.
- Kalel Venkman