Tyra Jakob
Registered User
Join date: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 2
|
11-17-2009 16:06
Would there be an interest in having and would LL support providing a beneficiary option to the users of SL?
The idea: SL users could name a beneficiary for their SL L$. In the event an SL user had a RL occurance that discontinued their ability to use SL, and the account was inactive for 180 days, the L$ in the account would pay over to the beneficiary.
Feedback on the idea anyone?
|
Briana Dawson
Attach to Mouth
Join date: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,855
|
11-17-2009 16:25
This can be handled by scripting for most things except being paid directly which could be handled with a profile notice telling people to only pay a particular object. What we need is a feature to stop direct pay so that payments can only be made to us via objects. 
|
Tyra Jakob
Registered User
Join date: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 2
|
Clarification: Beneficiary Option for SL Users?
11-17-2009 17:47
Would there be an interest and would LL support providing a beneficiary option to SL users?
The idea: SL users would have the option to name a beneficiary for their SL L$. In the event an SL user had a RL occurance that discontinued their ability to use SL, and the account was inacative for 180 days, the L$ in the SL user's account would pay over to the beneficiary of their choice.
Did not mean to cause confusion by using "residents" when refering to SL users. I hope this helps to clarify.
|