04-18-2005 15:10
As the creator of a group I found that the only way to remove a disruptive officer was to toss it to a group vote. Shouldnt the creator of the group have final say in who is or isnt in the group? A final authority who can override group decisions simply because he/she is the one who paid the 100 bucks to start the thing. I own 14000 meters of land I paid for myself and is supported with group tier. If my group decided to mutiny and go berserk, they could vote ME out of the group even tho I am the founder of the group. And all the cash I paid for the land could then be evenly devided amongst the evil mutinous group members after its sale. Perhaps land could be purchased in a groups name for its use, but the actual person paying the cash retain selling rights. The current system needs some fine tuning to cover all these possibilities Groups need more levels of hierarchy here, and the groups creator should have final godlike power over its management of hire and fires.
_____________________
~GIVEN FREE REIGN THE SYSTEM WILL TELL YOU,
WHAT TO DO,
WHEN AND HOW TO DO IT,
WHAT YOU CAN READ, VIEW, OR LISTEN TO,
WHAT YOU CAN SAY,
WHAT YOU CAN DO WITH YOUR OWN BODY,
AND SUCK ALL YOUR MONEY OUT OF YOUR POCKET WHILE IT DOES THIS!
QUESTION AUTHORITY!~ W.P