o Management of land as non-consumable investment in Second Life. This means that old regions receive regular upgrades and that land is not subject to technical aging. Land should have somewhat stable value not just in short term but in terms of 5 years or 10 years. The considerable monthly maintenance fees should make that possible.
Proposal 1 aims at bringing some fairness between recent and older private sims. Mainland sims get updated periodically, but it seems private sims don't. Wo here thinks it fair that LL keeps hardware up to date on these sims too ?
o No financial, technical or marketing support from Linden Lab for any resident media or political group that is not made available on equal basis to other media or political groups
o Linden Lab is of course allowed to run their own media when it is easily recognizable as non-resident media
o No using of Linden accounts to help businesses in ways not available to their competitors
o Linden Lab is of course allowed to run their own media when it is easily recognizable as non-resident media
o No using of Linden accounts to help businesses in ways not available to their competitors
I think these are aimed at the recent 'Linden modelling' and 'Linden DJing' for residents. I'd have to agree that Linden employees shouldn't use their position to help out a resident's market position, it stifles the open competition that LL apparently tries to maintain in SL economy.
HOWEVER I don't agree with the following:
o No Linden alts in groups related to resident business, media or political organizations
o No involvement of relatives or close friends of Linden Lab employees either
This is simply way too broad and restrictive. I think a Linden has the right to participate in SL and not just be an anonymous, asocial Mr Policeman. Besides I doubt anyone could stop them, it would be just too tempting

Now let's get onto the directly controversial:
o Right to a jury of one's peers, notification of the charges against one, and who has brought suit, right to counsel, right to find facts and present one's defense, public notification of punishments in a long-term archive for precedent-setting value
o Process for fair compensation of residents damaged by actions/changes originating from Linden Lab. Adjudication process for claims.
These two are giving me the creeps. "Jury" proposal: I don't think anyone but friends of victims/griefers care anough to get involved in judging a peer, so it implies either forcing residents on jury duty (and we know how popular this is in RL, plus I don't see how it can be enforced), either it's bound to become a mudfest. I'd rather this stays in the hands of the people who don't have such personal interests tied to this, Lindens.
However I welcome a bit more transparency, regarding what kind of offense brings what kind of punishments, for example.
As for the last, well, I'm not prepared to pay for other people's losing at business betting. You know the money used in this would have to come from somewhere. The people who are dependent upon SL to live have put themselves in this situation voluntarily and must assume the risks associated with it.