I have
256mb ram
256mb ATI a9250 radeon graphics
SL worked fine before 1.8.2.9 and 1.8.3.9 were installed
now I cant hardly move
nor will my graphics load half the time
The graphics card is brand new about 10 days old
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
1.8.3.9 < Problems |
|
|
Jon Aquitaine
Registered User
Join date: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 5
|
02-08-2006 19:19
I have
256mb ram 256mb ATI a9250 radeon graphics SL worked fine before 1.8.2.9 and 1.8.3.9 were installed now I cant hardly move nor will my graphics load half the time The graphics card is brand new about 10 days old |
|
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
|
02-08-2006 21:33
I've moved this to Technical Issues so hopefully you can get the help you deserve, since SL Answers isn't the right place for it... it needs unfolding and discussion! Please don't hesitate to contact support either.
![]() _____________________
|
|
Herzog Svarog
The Wise(ass)
Join date: 9 Nov 2004
Posts: 74
|
02-09-2006 06:05
I have 256mb ram 256mb ATI a9250 radeon graphics SL worked fine before 1.8.2.9 and 1.8.3.9 were installed now I cant hardly move nor will my graphics load half the time The graphics card is brand new about 10 days old 1.8.2.9 implimented a new way that SL looks at your installed memory and sort of "combines" the total between system and video RAM. The vid card is fine, but unless you want to lower your performance settings you'll have to bite the bullet and get more system RAM to maintain the performance level you are accustomed to (unless of course someone has a workaround for this, but I kinda doubt it). |
|
Nathan Stewart
Registered User
Join date: 2 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,039
|
02-09-2006 06:19
1.8.2.9 implimented a new way that SL looks at your installed memory and sort of "combines" the total between system and video RAM. The vid card is fine, but unless you want to lower your performance settings you'll have to bite the bullet and get more system RAM to maintain the performance level you are accustomed to (unless of course someone has a workaround for this, but I kinda doubt it). There should be an indicator in the adv.graphics tab of preferences, under the graphics ram selector it should show a recommended setting for your current configuration, im not sure how accurate it is but i would suggest setting your graphics ram used to 64Mb and maybe try the 128Mb setting. The way it works is that it allocates about the size of the graphics ram selected to be used as texture cache, ie if you select 256Mb it will allocate roughly 256Mb of ram for texture cache, as you only have 256Mb ram this will slow down things quite abit _____________________
|