memory usage goes higher over time
|
|
Yuriko Nishi
Registered User
Join date: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 288
|
04-25-2007 16:21
hi, the longer i play sl, the higher my memory usage goes. that usage doesn´t depend on my actions. i can stand in an empty sim, doing nothing, and still the usage goes up slowly. it starts at about 500 mb and after about 45 minutes it´s over 1 gig (i have 1 gig ram) and my computer starts to swap (sl gets unplayable) and i have to restart sl. this problem started with the "performance update". i think it was 1.14, not sure though about the version number. also sometimes when the swapfile gets that big, my hdd is working for about 2-5 minutes after i shut down sl (i can kill the service in the taskmanager to speed that up) i use win xp ati radeon x1600 256 mb amd athlon @ 2gig 1 gig ram anyone else having that problem? is there a solution? thanks for reading  yuri
|
|
Alph Rossini
Registered User
Join date: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 3
|
04-26-2007 07:10
I have the same problem than you but it's even worse because of my config beeing less powerfull than yours (half memory, older graphic card at least), even though it complies with the recommended specs. I do not have another solution than yours and I would like to know too if it's a normal behaviour, if the fault is with Win XP or if it's a memory leak in the viewer.
Alph
|
|
Carl Wilder
Registered User
Join date: 2 Feb 2007
Posts: 27
|
04-26-2007 08:23
It's called a "memory leak" and is a classic problem of buggy badly designed/written apps. Not that im actually *saying* SL is badly written.
|
|
Yuriko Nishi
Registered User
Join date: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 288
|
04-26-2007 10:41
hmm ok.
sounds like i fix is not easy then :-/ i wonder if it´s the same with mac/linux viewers
is LL aware of that problem?
|
|
Christopher Vestel
Registered User
Join date: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 37
|
04-26-2007 10:43
LL is not aware of anything.
|
|
Darien Caldwell
Registered User
Join date: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 3,127
|
04-26-2007 13:10
It's been there since I joined SL 6 months ago. I imagine it will be there a year from now.
|
|
Carl Wilder
Registered User
Join date: 2 Feb 2007
Posts: 27
|
04-27-2007 14:27
Memory leaks are hard to find in badly designed code bases, slightly less so in better designed ones. Sadly I think we have the former with the SL client.
|
|
Kyrah Abattoir
cruelty delight
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 2,786
|
04-27-2007 15:37
or the latter
f***ing whiners
_____________________
 tired of XStreetSL? try those! apez http://tinyurl.com/yfm9d5b metalife http://tinyurl.com/yzm3yvw metaverse exchange http://tinyurl.com/yzh7j4a slapt http://tinyurl.com/yfqah9u
|
|
Shaun Stanley
Registered User
Join date: 2 Aug 2006
Posts: 27
|
04-27-2007 19:51
I have 2GB ram now as of recent due to the horribly written code in SL. I had a gig and it'd start out at about 600mb ram and as said in the thread would climb to over 1gb. My hard drive to ram swapping was horrible and so was the lag. So, I finally decided to upgrade my memory.
Following the upgrade, the highest amount of memory SL has taken up is 1.6gb. A new record for me!
GOOOOOOOO LL!
|
|
Yuriko Nishi
Registered User
Join date: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 288
|
04-28-2007 07:56
funny thing kyrah  you talk about perma banning whiners, i think you should be perma banned for calling me a fucking whiner because i asked for help...
|
|
Walker Moore
Fоrum Unregular
Join date: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1,458
|
04-28-2007 11:49
From: Carl Wilder Memory leaks are hard to find in badly designed code bases, slightly less so in better designed ones. Sadly I think we have the former with the SL client. Memory leaks are inevitable, and if open sourcing the client demonstrated anything, it was that the code was surprisingly tidy and well commented. Given the fast evolution of the SL client, the only surprise is that memory leaks aren't a much bigger problem.
|