From: Joannah Cramer
It's realism, sorry if the reality isn't up to your rosy expectations ^.^
Why is that pessimists always say "but I'm just being realistic"? It's so sad, really.
What it really boils down to is what psychologists call self-fulfilling prophesy. If you expect things to go badly, your subconsicious will find a way to ensure that they do, and then your conscious mind gets to go "see, I was right; it was realistic to expect crap." The thing is the opposite is also true. Approach a situation fully expecting to succeed, and you likely will. Ask any champion acheiver, whether they be in sports, business, the arts, etc. They'll all tell you that.
From: Joannah Cramer
Please note, am not trying to waste time complaining about 'so few jobs'... am pointing out because the jobs are so few, it's a waste of time to actually try to find one.
That's the most rediculous thing I've ever heard. Because something may be relatively scarce or challenging to find, it's waste of time to look for it? To me, if something's hard to acheive, it makes it that much more worthwhile to try.
RL jobs are hard to get too, especially if you go in with a pessimistic attitude. Does that mean it's not worth trying? "Waste of time," for shame. Nothing worth doing is every easy.
From: Joannah Cramer
Anyone in look for money is better off either camping for startup money for their own business (if they have skills) or probably buying the L$ off the market.
That's a matter of opinion, and it depends entirely on the individual. For what it's worth, in RL I've been self employed almost my entire adult life, and I'd always recommend to people that they're better off working for themselves than for others (both in SL and in RL), provided they have the drive to make a success of it, which not everyone does. That is why I only suggested getting a job as one option among many. To dismiss that option outright as being "unrealsitic" without even trying is silly and irresponsible.
From: Joannah Cramer
Don't "just glance", actually read them.
Uh, I did actually read all the ads I cited. By "quick glance" I simply meant that one can very quickly see just by looking at the post titles on the first page that there are several jobs available. I thought it rather obvious that reading the ads themselves after that was the next logical step, and the only way I would have been able to know what they said in order to reference them as I did. I guess next time I'll have to quote every word or something in order to avoid silly accusations like this.
In any case, it only took all of about five minutes to read all those ads in their entirity, so it can still be referred to as "quick". It's hardly the monumental task you seem to want to imply.
From: Joannah Cramer
At least half of these 'skilled labour requests' are actually 'skilled labourers' looking for job, not the other way around.
And the other half are people who are looking to hire, which of course is the half I was talking about. Why is that hard to understand?
From: Joannah Cramer
Then yes, you have a request for "escorts" and a couple other spots, and there's no "etc", that's _it_.
First, what's wrong with beig an escourt if someone is so inclined? You make it sound like it's something no one would ever do, or if they did, there must be something wrong with them. That's so wrong.
Second, there is plenty of "etc". New ones pop up all the time. In fact, nine new job listings have appeared in the half day since my last reply to this thread. Several of them are seeking relatively unskilled laborers*, such as event cooridinators, performers, sales people, DJ's, and actors, as well as a few requests for those with Photoshop skills. Except for the Photoshop-related ones, none of these jobs requires the laborer to spend any money on uploads, which by all appearances was the OP's main concern here anyway.
*DISCLAIMER: No offense was intended to the event coordinators, performers, sales people, DJ's, and actors of the world by the use of the phrase "relatively unskilled". Obviously those who are very good at those jobs (and any other jobs) are skilled at what they do. I simply meant that what people tend to refer to as "skilled labor" in SL generally has to do with specific tasks such as texturing, 3D modeling, and scripting, and that the afore mentioned jobs do not require skill in those particular areas. No inference that others cannot be equally skilled at their specific professions was intended.From: Joannah Cramer
In the meantime, there's been ~1 k people introduced into SL. Try to guesstimate the likeliness of actually getting that work, when your initial odds are ~1:1000? _that_ was my point, not that people might not be 'desperate enoug to play a butler for few days".
You act like getting a job is akin to winning the lottery or something. It's not a question of odds in any way, shape, or form. First, as you well point out, a sizable portion of those 1,000 people won't be looking jobs anyway. Second, since when does getting a job boil down to anything other than determination in the end? If you want something, you do what it takes to get it. For a job, that means contacting the employer, making a good impression, and selling them on hiring you. It's not about probability; it's about proactively making things happen, period.
From: Joannah Cramer
Oh, and incidentally "when there's a will, there is a lawsuit" appears closer to truth than your version, generally... but that's another story :>
Spoken like a true pessimist. Even assuming this cynical (and not quite clever or humorous) statement has any truth to it at all, I think you're forgetting that the lawyers who would file all those law suits all have jobs, and they all got those jobs through force of will. They didn't sit around bitching about how law school might be a waste of time, or about how the odds of getting hired by a law firm are too slim. They did what it took in order to get what they wanted. They applied their will and they found their way.
Anyway, I see little point in continuing this off topic debate. I've said all I care to on this subject. You're a pessimist; I'm a relative optimist, and it's unlikely unlikely we'll ever see eye to eye. I'l be enough of a "realist" to accept that fact, and I'll move on.
The important thing is the OP's question has been answered many times over. He can make his own decision on whether or not to look for a job, persue one or more of the other options mentioned, or both.