From: someone
Originally posted by Briana Dawson
I asked you for the sake of our friendship to remove yourself but instead you chose to attack me.
Where did I attack you? When? I never attacked you.
From: someone
- (1) Your need for your own personal retail exposure I felt compromised the project since it was more important for you to have a prime retail location that it was for the retailers who would be paying rent.
Before we started project I asked you where my base store should be located in Galleria City. You said "Of course at the mall level".
When mall was being built, I placed my store at the outer edge of the mall, far from telehub. I did so only for testing and see how it looks.
The next day YOU had moved it right next to telehub. I was very surprised.
Then one day later, when you had started setting up shop grid you became unhappy with your OWN placement of my store.
You asked me to move my store further away, so I complied and I moved it far away, outside the main mall. We also agreed I would use a smaller sized outlet near telehub. So I marked one store outlet for my use.
One day later that store outlet was moved 10m from telehub. I did not say a word.
Later I see there is one smaller outlet at telehub marked for rent at 750 L$ a week. So I ask you if I can use that 5x5x10m outlet near telehub instead of the other 10x10x10m outlet. You agree and tell me it is no problem.
I spend two hours setup outlet, then you come, see it and start drama about the same thing that you just had agreed on. I suggest to you that I pay rent like every other retailer. I even reduce size of outlet again, put up some space on telehub side for rent.
I never used any space in mall that you did not agree to. You shoved me back and forth several times and I let it happen.
From: someone
- (2) You divided your interest with another to setup a 2nd sim and wanted it connect to G.C.. This was not my wish, after I informed as to my reasons you continued to insist and discount my concerns or even recognize the conflict of interest.
Mae Best is planning to setup a sim for builders. She is friend of mine, so I came to you and suggested to connect sims because it would be mutually beneficial. All I did was bring forward some suggestions. I did not act in any way.
You did not want to connect because you were afraid of "competition" in "your" grid.
At the same time that you disallowed me to follow such plans, you told me about sims of your own that YOU were planning to connect to Galleria City. So effectively in this partnership you reserved the right for yourself to buy and add as many sims and side projects to GC, while not granting me such right.
Needless to mention I still oblieged to your decision and even removed myself from Mae Best's project to address your concerns of "conflict of interest".
From: someone
- (1) You held 25% of this partnership, 1 vote; I held 75% of this partnership, 3 votes.
So if I hold 75% of Microsoft and you hold 25% I can just kick you out giving you whatever you once contributed as founding money?
How about fact that I contributed 50% of sim money, you only 25% and an anoymous contributer donated 25%?
From: someone
- (2) When you came to about G.C., I told you I had all the funding neccessary - remember? You became sad - I told you I think about it and after 24hours I believed that working together we would have synergy. Your investment was superfluous and accepted by as a friend who wanted a friend to share something really cool.
This is a lie. The truth is that I had idea of mall built around telehub and contacted you. At that time you did not have money to buy sim. Linden can confirm that the setup of the sim was delayed because everybody was waiting for my money that I sent you via PayPal arrive on your normal bank account.
Only after sim was setup you got money. Then, and after seeing positive response of retailers and high demand for stores you dumped me because you could.
From: someone
- Your lack of recognizing that I helped you and not the other way around is disturbing.
How did you help me?
From: someone
I returned your investment with 20% interest for your (5 day involvement) initially, and you sent it back. The final refund was sent back to you via Paypal.
I sent you 490 US$ and paid something like 30 British pounds for domain registration fees. You sent me back 540 US$. But this is not real issue. I also spent much longer time on website, database, shop management system and so on, dating back more than one month.
What if I now send you the 245 US$ that you invested, plus 30% for your time and claim ownership of Galleria City? Or 100% bonus? Would you like that? Would you do this even if I paid you double?
From: someone
- I banned you after you referred to me as stupid,
It is true I told you in private conversation that I think what you did was stupid. This was after you had called me much worse things.
People should take note that telling Briana that something she did and that you think was "stupid" will get you banned from her mall.
Disagree with Briana and if she can, she will shoot you in your head.
From: someone
- Please hold the drama: I RETURNED THEM, not deleted, not destroyed.
You returned them unlinked and in pieces. You used your power, which is based on the trust of the retailer community and shoppers, to destroy my retail opportunity in most frequented mall because I had told you in private conversation that something you did was "stupid".
Of course you did not care to ask the retailers of Galleria Aqua. You are sole dictator. Is that running mall in "best interest of retailers"?
From: someone
- The neg rating was earned after you once again, insulted me via IM, and when I said to you "this is the 2nd time you have chosen to insult me", you replied "Im glad you feel insulted" (or something to that effect). So I neg-rated you. I did not triple neg rate you.
I never said that. I think I have that conversation on my computer. If you want I can post.
From: someone
- This question is just meant to create fear and uncertainty.
No, it is a very valid concern for the retailer community now.
From: someone
#1 Your idea to auction the G.C. store builds LUNA STYLE, I found offensive to maintaining personal friendships with the retailers. I felt it is wrong for me to charge people i have known so long such high prices as Luna, or even allow for a system that could make that happen.
- I posed a question to you: What if they pay a high price, and dontmake their money back? Your response was "they should buy a cheaper spot". Well, after losing one friend from Aqua who informed me that Icharged too much, especially in light of our friendship, it was somewhat of a wakeup call that I had to temper business with a the emotion of personal friendships.
I suggested that it could be fair to auction off best shops near telehub. It is what Linden is doing with land. Personally I think it is better than using crowny system. I also suggested use money that is higher than standard store rent for events and contests, or even use it to lower rent for newbie designer.
This was just one suggestion that I raised once.
You said you did not like it.
So what exactly did I do wrong? I can not even voice suggestion?
From: someone
#2 - You forever justified your right to have a giant build inthe G.C. telehub square that took of 4 stores.
My tea house is 2 stores. You initially moved it there. When you asked me I moved it away. I never ever argued for having a giant build, or any non-standard build at the central mall area. This is something you are making up now.
From: someone
After removing this, you then justified your right to occupy 1 of 4 telehub locations.
Being a retailer also, I think I should have chance to rent space as any other retailer. However, even though I did not agree with you, I followed your request to move to other spot. As I wrote above, I moved to small mini outlet near telehub after I had asked you and you had agreed I could use if I give up medium sized outlet that you had assigned me 10m from telehub.
From: someone
- As a retailer and a mall owner, I feel the Mall Owner should not maintain a retail presence greater than the retailers.
I never asked for that.
From: someone
The retailers pay premium rent so that they can have the spotlight, not so that they can feel as though they are just a plate garnish to the mall owners premier prime location display.
I offered to pay rent myself.
From: someone
- For you, your own retail success is more important than those who would pay you rent.
I have the feeling you construct some excuse.
From: someone
#3 - Your ideas were absolutely.... astonishingly invasive.
- No one wants to add a script to every prim they create so that we can then track it and delete it at will. This is what you wanted.
- I did not agree with your extensive tracking scripts for the vendors we were to place throughout the city mall. I felt the data you were collecting was invasive and I would not have final control over this data but you; so it could be sold as marketing information - something you mentioned many times.
Wow! Now I am speechless!
So you are saying I wanted to collect data and sell as marketing information?
I never, ever suggested something like this. This is insane.
However, when Adam demoed his system I warned you of the possibility that somebody who is not part of the mall could use information in negative way.
From: someone
- Adam Zaius does the exact same thing, however you berated his vendor system - while at the same time adjusting yours to be more like it. This is disturbing. I chose to go with Adam because he exhibits a higher level of moral integrity than you and more importantly, he is not greedy.
You chose to go with Adam because you wanted to exclude me from important system in the mall so you can satisfy your own greed without partner. You wanted total control. This was one more step in you assuming total and sole control of Galleria City project in your strive for power and domination.
From: someone
- We had not spoken for over 4 days, and whenever you came to G.C. i went afk and then logged. This was not a healthy relationship.
I see. Now you even blame ME for YOU not talking to me.
From: someone
#5 - If you knew how to invest in someone elses dream without feeling the need to make your own impression, then we could have worked together smoothly.
Interesting. If you want partnership with Briana you are not allowed to make own impression.
Whenever we disagreed I complied.
So you should say "without feeling the need to ever make a suggestion"
From: someone
- You were told that G.C. was my dream, and we agreed that I had final creative say, however you never acted this way. And you repeatedly acted as if I had never created a mall before - this was also very stunning.
Tell me one single ocasion where I acted without your prior consent.
But you acted as if I would not exist.
From: someone
#6 - Your conflict of interest by way of your tendril like investments in many other projects which you then wanted to piggy back onto Galleria City was yet again disturbing.
I never piggy backed any project on GC.
From: someone
And once again.. . Your taking this issue public the first time was the strongest factor in my finally deciding to terminate our relationship. Business between individuals should have remained as such. Not a public affair.
I see. So the reason for breaking business agreement was that I asked for help with my bad feelings after you broke the business agreement?
Now listen. I think the truth is: Last monday you dumped me. Then you temporarily undid your action because many people were upset and you worried about your public image. Now one week later you just completed what you had temporarily postponed.
From: someone
Your initial request was that I give you %50 of the earnings.
- 50% for what? 25% for what?
Now this is one question you must have asked yourself BEFORE you agreed to business partnership.
In any case I still remember how we had to wait for the money I sent you via PayPal arrive at your bank account before Linden could charge you and setup the sim. Without my investment there would be no Galleria City.
The truth is, if you would have declined I may have done Galleria City project on my own or with other partner. There are more malls in SL. I could have asked somebody else.
You wanted to be first, so you accepted my money, entered partnership while you need me, then kick me out.
From: someone
I bring 40+ retailers to Galleria City
So you own the retailers?
From: someone
You have contributed nothing but emotional grief to the detriment of our personal friendship.
You tried to manipulate me with your declarations of love for me and such.
I ignore such and other personal comments that are neither true nor contribute to the topic at hand. I am not going to return in kind.
(Edited to correct quote tags)