|
Yumi Murakami
DoIt!AttachTheEarOfACat!
Join date: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,860
|
02-16-2006 04:39
It seems that whenever I give someone a vendor-type object - where they need permission to copy the items inside in order to sell them, but future customers shouldn't have copy permission - there's no way to avoid having to require the reciever to manually edit the next owner permissions.. is that right or am I missing something?
|
|
Jesrad Seraph
Nonsense
Join date: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 1,463
|
02-16-2006 04:41
AFAIK that's accurate :/
_____________________
Either Man can enjoy universal freedom, or Man cannot. If it is possible then everyone can act freely if they don't stop anyone else from doing same. If it is not possible, then conflict will arise anyway so punch those that try to stop you. In conclusion the only strategy that wins in all cases is that of doing what you want against all adversity, as long as you respect that right in others.
|
|
Ron Overdrive
Registered User
Join date: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 1,002
|
02-16-2006 06:02
Unfortunately not. They can hand out no-copy items but once they sell that no copy item thats it, they're all out. Just out of curiousity, are you handing out vendors to employees? If so something like JENC might be more benificial for you as you can adjust commision, have one location to store your items, and multipul catagories. Just becareful though, networked vendors & their servers are lag causers especially if you have a handful of them.
|
|
Enabran Templar
Capitalist Pig
Join date: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,506
|
02-16-2006 06:44
_____________________
From: Hiro Pendragon Furthermore, as Second Life goes to the Metaverse, and this becomes an open platform, Linden Lab risks lawsuit in court and [attachment culling] will, I repeat WILL be reverse in court.
|
|
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
|
02-16-2006 06:46
Permissions still suck.
|
|
Yumi Murakami
DoIt!AttachTheEarOfACat!
Join date: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,860
|
02-16-2006 08:43
|
