when is a player limited on wining a game 4 times in a row?

I am not sure if this is the area to give my opinion. Not here and I read the guidelines. I am jsut stating an opinion. I am not here to give the person name or the place. I think I am still a bit upset today. I was in one area, and I stil like the place to win or earned lindens. today, I wanted to know the question is should a person who wins example 4 times in row in a casino card game in one hour be able to keep or allowed to win again many times or should there be a limited.

Today, other ppl and myself was doing a card game at one of the area, the owner wasnt there but the other hostees were: other ppl play and i knwo everyone wants to get the win the pot of lindens. The thign that really get me tight is one person or an individual kept on wining not once but three times. After the event, they did the same thing other person donate and host the same game so played 4 tiems in a row the same individual won again giving a 4th win the pot was substantial. The thing is not sure if the other hosters should stop the person who kept on winining over and over, but I have no proof either if the game was rigged to allow taht person to win many times (no proof), but I know there are advanced players, that are excellent in a skill or that player has lots of luck winning over 2k pot & more but in a constant. I am not taking away that person greatness or wins, but I am not sure if the hosters should limited that win to an individual who wins 3 or more in a row in a constant, but the hosters didnt stop the person. Agree the person has a right to play again, but wining 4 tiems in a row. No owner of the area was not in there to watch that.

One thing is I love the area where u can win for some small lindens, and other players try out and myself to the card games, but I am not sure the person who kept on winning and getting the high scores on winning constant in a row today was jsut for greed on lindens, bec many ppl and myself are not advanced the person who had luck today, and it is fair for the ppl who are new or being there for a while at the place are trying the same game and played and have fun, and if the person who didnt care for the other ppl.

One thing that is not fun is one person kept on winining again and again which in fact I got a bit upset about that and I am not sure if the other players are getting tired of one person kept on wininng the same card game yet that person had a tremendous luck today on his side to win 4 in a row in a constant, but I for one thinkgin if the game was either being cheated or rigged so one person cahnge to win & the owner fot he area wasnt in to see waht happened only the hosters.

Sorry if this is the palce to state that opinion which there is a way we can voice our opinion, but should one player who wins in a constant row today be able to paly that game over and over yet the sim of the are is dong it every day. I for one was not happy for that person winign over 4 or 5 times in a row, but I dont want to leave the area for tryign to win also but it takes the fun out not only myself but the other ppl that are new or for a long time be able to play a game but the same person keep on winining in a game and geting high scores including other ppl who are advanced players at the sim area but not allowing any newbie or the new players in. So, should by right I should report this to the owner which he or she wasnt on? Any opinons on this view

Ty
CountD Wishbringer

People need to remember that these games are for entertainment only.. if you came here to win a lot of L$ (or lose a lot of L$) than you probably be better off in a RL casino.

I udnerstand that maybe I miss the fun out of it. The place did give out free slots to let other ppl win is equal. Im not taking way the fun or the person to win, but keep that that person luck to win in a row & other ppl getign high scores ithin thearea is jsut luck. it takes away other ppl dotn want to play with the individuals or individual doing it in a constant row. Im notr sure if I was the only one felt that. just givng an opinon on my view. TY

This goes both ways. If mechanisms ought to be put in place to stop people from winning too often, there should be the same to prevent them from losing too often.

In any case, people have the right to win all the time. It is, after all, luck and/or chance. If you wish to dispute any particular situation where you think someone may have been cheating, that is a different thing entirely.

It's like the occasional high school football game where sometimes the refs will nullify a hugely lopsided score at halftime and make that school have to earn its points all over again. This is unfair to the hardworking players but it is done anyway "to give the other team a chance". Give me a break.