Hi Salzie!
From: Salzie Sachertorte
I have been looking for public administative-type systems and documents, and find bits and pieces here and there but nothing in a finished form, so it has me wondering - Have any of the following things been done? If so, where might I find them?
Good to see you're "doing your homework"

To be honest I am still muddling through the forum history myself to catch up with the events and discussions of the latter part of 2005. The Neualtenburg forum is one of the largest on secondlife.com so there's a lot to read - even if much of it is banter without relevance to the governing structures and decisions.
From: Salzie Sachertorte
Mission Statement?
Vision Statement?
Value Statement?
Diversity Statement?
Stakeholders Survey?
Strategic Plan?
Organizational Chart?
Program Planning Process?
Action Strategy?
Budget Planning Process Documentation
Records/Knowledge Mangement System?
Your question is very relevant I think as it strikes at a key issue in our development, namely the "professionalisation of our bureaucracy".
So far the focus in Neualtenburg has been pretty much on the discussions of governance, building, lawmaking and the constitution in my view: The branches of government that we have in place are very heavy on thinking, discussion and decision making capacities but quite light-weight in terms of power to transform these decisions into actions and structures.
Many of those documents that you mention are as I see it the hallmarks of a mature and well-developed bureaucracy - which traditionally falls under the exectuive branch of government. Since we do not have a proper executive branch of government but have rather spread out the executive powers into 'government and service roles' of the various branches, it is only recently that we have begun to pay attention to the need for more executive focus in my view.
Remember, this is a young democracy although by SL terms we have already lasted quite long and presumably outlasted a few other communities dependent upon the initiative and resources of a few benevolent autocrats.
However, as we mature, as more laws are passed and administrative routines are instituted the need for somebody to step in and take care of the proper execution of the principal decisions and structures mandated by the RA for example becomes larger.
We have seen the first infant steps toward professionalising a bureaucracy in Neualtenburg: About a little over a month ago I think it was decided by the RA to allocate a portion of the budget to establish positions as archivists for each of the three branches of government. The positions are to be compensated with 1,000 L$/month and the responsibilites were to be described by the branches. I am not sure how far this initiative has progressed. It seems to me the leaders of the branches have so far been satisfied with carrying out the duties themselves. At least I have seen no announcements of the positions being available.
Many of those documents that you mention would be or could be the responsibility of the Guild to craft. However, since the administrative capacities are to a large extent the burden of one person - namely Guildmaster Sudane Erato (and prior to that Kendra Bancroft) - I think it's fair to say we have preferred to adopt an approach of "build it as and when it's needed in an actual Neualtenburg problem context" rather than shape the administrative working practices of the guild and the other branches of government from the top down according to for example a classical idealised Weberian model of bureaucracy or the more modern New Public Management philosophy.
Sudane or other citizens with a more intimate or more extensive knowledge of the branches of government will probably be better positioned to give you specific feedback on the individual items you post - I just wanted to give you a broad context in reply to your question.
As I said however I think your question is spot on since one of the major challenges that all branches of government face right now lie in developing, formalising and implementing guidelines and structures for their internal way of working. For the Scientific Council for example, this encompasses drawing up guidelines for forum moderation, handling the court system and archiving our verdicts and proceedings. I think I have already outlined in an earlier post some of the challenges faced by the Guild. The RA has I think come the farthest in formalising its internal routines, which is only natural, since they meet practically weekly and constitute a broad group of individuals between whom work can be naturally delegated.
I hope the above has contributed just a little toward clarifying things for you. If this gives rises to any further questions please don't hesitate to ask. I'm also sure that some of the other citizens will chime in to answer other parts of your post
